引用本文:杨秉庚,蔡思源,刘宇娟,徐灵颖,汪玉,彭显龙,赵旭,颜晓元.土壤供保氮能力决定稻田氮肥增产效果和利用率[J].土壤学报,DOI:10.11766/trxb202104070181,[已录用].
杨秉庚,蔡思源,刘宇娟,徐灵颖,汪玉,彭显龙,赵旭,颜晓元.Soil nitrogen supply and retention capacity determine the effect and utilization rate of nitrogen fertilizer in paddy field.[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,DOI:10.11766/trxb202104070181,[In Press]
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 162次   下载 88  
分享到: 微信 更多
土壤供保氮能力决定稻田氮肥增产效果和利用率
杨秉庚1, 蔡思源1, 刘宇娟1, 徐灵颖1, 汪玉1, 彭显龙2, 赵旭1, 颜晓元1
1.中国科学院南京土壤研究所,常熟农业生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站,土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室;2.东北农业大学资源与环境学院
摘要:
黑龙江五常和江苏常熟分属我国东北和华东单季稻区优质粳米的代表性产地,但五常维持水稻高产所需氮肥投入量通常远低于常熟而其增产效果好于常熟。由于两地水热条件、作物品种、农田管理和土壤类型均不同,究竟是何原因导致这种区域差异尚不清楚。为探究土壤因素的影响,在两地稻田分别取黑土型水稻土(BS)和乌栅土(WS),设不施氮(CK)、低氮和高氮(N 150和300 kg·hm-2标记尿素)处理,开展盆栽试验,比较水稻产量、氮肥利用及总损失的土壤差异,并结合室内淹水矿化培养试验,研究两种水稻土氮素矿化特征。结果发现:在相同气候和水稻品种及管理条件下进行的盆栽试验中,各处理水稻产量、氮肥增产效果及地上氮素吸收累积量BS均优于WS,差值法氮肥利用率BS较WS高出20.0~28.7个百分点,然而,15N示踪法氮肥利用率BS却仅比WS高5.56~8.01个百分点。尽管施氮后水稻吸收土壤氮均增加,但BS土壤来源氮增量比WS高95.0%~215%。根据CK和相应施氮处理水稻地上部土壤来源氮差值可计算土壤氮素表观激发量在BS为173~354 mg·pot-1,在WS仅为88~113 mg·pot-1,与淹水培养试验中施氮后土壤氮净矿化量BS高出WS 0.95~2.49倍相一致。这说明施氮对BS土壤供氮量增加有更大促进作用。盆栽试验中BS土壤上15N肥料总损失也随施氮量增加低于WS。综上,氮肥对BS土壤激发效应强,可提供更多土壤矿化氮和损失较低是其维持较高氮肥利用率和高产的主要原因;而氮肥对WS土壤激发效应低,且肥料氮土壤保持能力较弱,因此,水稻生长对高量氮肥投入的依赖性更高。土壤是影响稻田氮肥增产效果和氮肥利用率差异的重要因素。
关键词:  关键词:农学利用效率  氮肥利用率  15N示踪  激发效应  净矿化氮
基金项目:国家重点研发计划课题(2017YFD0200104)和中国科学院青年创新促进会会员基金(Y201956),国家科技攻关计划
Soil nitrogen supply and retention capacity determine the effect and utilization rate of nitrogen fertilizer in paddy field.
Yang Binggeng1, Cai Siyuan1, Liu Yujuan1, Xu Lingying1, Wang Yu1, Peng Xianlong2, Zhaoxu1, Yan Xiaoyuan1
1.State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Changshu National Agro-Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences;2.College of Resources and Environment, Northeast agricultural university
Abstract:
Wuchang and Changshu are the representative production areas of high-quality japonica single-cropping rice in Northeast and East of China, respectively. However, the amount of nitrogen (N) fertilizer required to maintain a high yield in Wuchang is usually much lower than that in Changshu, but the agronomic use efficiency of fertilizer N (AE) is higher than that in Changshu. Different hydrothermal conditions, crop varieties, farmland managements and soil types in these two places make it difficult to identify what causes such regional differences. To explore soil factors" influence on NUE, black paddy soil (BS) and gleyed paddy soil (WS) were collected from the two rice fields. There were three N treatments as follows: no N treatment (CK), low N rate and high N rate (150 and 300 kg N·hm-2 with 15N urea). A rice pot experiment was carried out in Changshu National Agro-Ecosystem Observation and Research Station to compare the rice yield, NUE, and total N loss between the two soils. The characteristics of N mineralization in the two paddy soils were also studied through a three-week indoor anaerobic incubation experiment. The results suggested that the rice yield, agronomic fertilizer N use efficiency and above-ground N uptake of BS were better than that of WS among these N treatments under the same climate, rice variety and management levels. The NUE of BS was higher than that of WS by about 20.0-28.7%. However, the 15N recovery efficiency of BS was only higher than that of WS by about 5.56-8.01%. Although the above-ground N uptake by rice increased after N addition in two soils, the N increment of BS from the soil source was 95%-215% higher than that of WS. Also, the increment of N taken up from the priming effect (difference of above-ground plant N uptake derived from the soil between CK and the corresponding N application treatments) of BS was 173-354 mg·pot-1 and 88-113 mg·pot-1 for WS. This observation was consistent with the results that the net soil N mineralization amount of BS was 0.95-2.49 times higher than that of WS after N application in the anaerobic incubation experiment. Thus, this result indicated that the N application had a greater priming effect on the increase of N supply in BS soil. Also, the total loss of 15N fertilizer in WS soil was significantly higher than that of BS with the increase of N application rate in the pot experiment. Overall, the high yield and NUE of BS may be related to the fact that N fertilizer could provide a greater priming effect and maintain a higher soil N retention level. However, the rice yield of WS depended more on the N fertilizer input due to its lower priming effect of N fertilizer and had a weaker ability to retain fertilizer N. Thus, the soil is an important factor influencing the difference in agronomic use efficiency of fertilizer N and N use efficiency in paddy fields.
Key words:  Key words: Agronomic use efficiency of fertilizer N  fertilizer N use efficiency  15N trace  priming effect  net mineralization N.