Rainfall Erosion Process on Earth Road as Affected by Thickness of the Surface Regolith Layer in Loess Region
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

S157

Fund Project:

National key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0401600), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.40771127,41761062,41701316) and the Key Deployment of Chinese Academy of Sciences (2+3 Project) (No.02102-A315021615)

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] Having long been used for transportation and traffic, earth roads have a regolith layer formed on their surface, which aggravates erosion of the roads. Up to now, very little knowledge is available about how erosion proceeds on the earth roads with a surface regolith layer and how the regolith layer affects erosion of the earth roads.[Method] An indoor artificially simulated rainfall experiment was used to investigate characteristics of the runoff and sediment production on roads with a surface regolith layer varying in thickness (thin layer=1.0 cm, and thick layer=4.0 cm). In the experiment a movable hydraulic slope-changeable steel trough, 2m in length, 0.5m in width and 0.55m in height, was used and packed with loess soil to simulate a earth road with a surface regolith layer. The trough was packed first with a layer of loess soil as road, 1.68 g·cm-3 in bulk density, and then with a layer of regolith, 1.20 g·cm-3 in bulk density. The experiment was designed to have 3 levels of slope, 4°, 8° and 16° and 4 levels of intensity, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 mm·min-1. Before each test, a white nylon thread was placed between the road and the regolith layer at the bottom end of the trough, and used to determine sources of the erosive materials by the degree of its exposure. And then the erosion process of the regolith covered road was divided into two stages:1) mere regolith erosion and 2) regolith and road soil mixed erosion.[Result] Results show:(1) The mean runoff rate of regolith on the road with a thin layer of regolith was 1.01-1.52 times at the first stage and 1.26-2.44 times at the second stage that on the road with a thick layer of regolith. When the artificial rainfall was set at 2.5 mm·min-1 in intensity, the average runoff yield per rainfall event was 43.44 L from the road regardless of slope degree, and 37.36%-82.05% higher than that when the rainfall was 1.0-2.0 mm·min-1 in intensity; (2) During the second stage erosion, the average sediment concentration was 227.30 g·L-1 on the road 16° in slope, and about 2.14 times and 1.37 times that on the road 4° in slope and 8° in slope, respectively. Under rainfalls low in intensity (1.0 and 1.5 mm·min-1), sediment yield per rainfall event was high on the road with a thick regolith layer, being about 1.39-2.14 times that on the road with a thin regolith layer; whereas under rainfalls high in intensity (2.0, 2.5 mm·min-1), it was high on the road with a thin regolith layer, being about 1.14-1.67 times that on the road with a thick regolith layer. And under rainfalls 1.0 mm·min-1 in intensity, the average sediment yield per rainfall event on roads regardless of slope degree was 2.08 kg, which equaled to 23.57%-68.59% of that under rainfalls 1.5-2.5 mm·min-1 in intensity; (3) During the second stage erosion and the entire course of a rainfall event, sediment concentration in the runoff was more closely related to runoff rate on the road with a thin regolith layer than on the one with a thick regolith layer.[Conclusion] All the findings in this study may serve as a scientific basis for prevention and control of erosion on regolith-covered earth road erosion in the Loess areas.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

JI Lijing, WANG Wenlong, KANG Hongliang, LI Jianming, SHI Qianhua, BAI Yun, NIE Huiying, SU Huan. Rainfall Erosion Process on Earth Road as Affected by Thickness of the Surface Regolith Layer in Loess Region[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2021,58(1):92-105.

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:August 28,2019
  • Revised:October 14,2019
  • Adopted:December 11,2019
  • Online: August 25,2020
  • Published: January 11,2021