黄土区薄厚层浮土土质道路降雨侵蚀过程差异
作者:
中图分类号:

S157

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0501604),国家自然科学基金项目(40771127,41761062,41701316);中国科学院重点部署(2+3项目)(02102-A315021615)


Rainfall Erosion Process on Earth Road as Affected by Thickness of the Surface Regolith Layer in Loess Region
Author:
Fund Project:

National key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0401600), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.40771127,41761062,41701316) and the Key Deployment of Chinese Academy of Sciences (2+3 Project) (No.02102-A315021615)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [37]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    土质道路经长期碾压产生了大量浮土,加剧了道路侵蚀。本文通过人工模拟降雨试验,研究不同雨强及坡度条件下薄层1.0 cm和厚层4.0 cm浮土土质道路的产流产沙特征。根据侵蚀物质的差异,将浮土道路侵蚀过程分为单独浮土侵蚀阶段和浮土、道路混合侵蚀阶段。结果表明:(1)浮土侵蚀阶段、混合侵蚀阶段薄层浮土平均径流率为厚层浮土的1.01倍~1.52倍、1.26倍~2.44倍。2.5 mm·min-1雨强时3个坡度下的平均次降雨产流量为43.44 L,较1.0~2.0 mm·min-1雨强提高37.36%~82.05%;(2)混合侵蚀阶段16°坡面平均含沙量均值为227.30 g·L-1,为4°和8°的2.14倍和1.37倍。小雨强(1.0、1.5 mm·min-1)时厚层浮土次降雨产沙量为薄层浮土的1.39倍~2.14倍;大雨强(2.0、2.5 mm·min-1)时薄层浮土次降雨产沙量为厚层浮土的1.14倍~1.67倍。1.0 mm·min-1雨强时3个坡度下的平均次降雨产沙量为2.08 kg,占1.5~2.5 mm·min-1雨强的23.57%~68.59%;(3)混合侵蚀阶段及次降雨过程薄层浮土含沙量与径流率相关性较厚层浮土均增强。结果可为黄土区浮土道路侵蚀防治工作的开展提供科学依据。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] Having long been used for transportation and traffic, earth roads have a regolith layer formed on their surface, which aggravates erosion of the roads. Up to now, very little knowledge is available about how erosion proceeds on the earth roads with a surface regolith layer and how the regolith layer affects erosion of the earth roads.[Method] An indoor artificially simulated rainfall experiment was used to investigate characteristics of the runoff and sediment production on roads with a surface regolith layer varying in thickness (thin layer=1.0 cm, and thick layer=4.0 cm). In the experiment a movable hydraulic slope-changeable steel trough, 2m in length, 0.5m in width and 0.55m in height, was used and packed with loess soil to simulate a earth road with a surface regolith layer. The trough was packed first with a layer of loess soil as road, 1.68 g·cm-3 in bulk density, and then with a layer of regolith, 1.20 g·cm-3 in bulk density. The experiment was designed to have 3 levels of slope, 4°, 8° and 16° and 4 levels of intensity, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 mm·min-1. Before each test, a white nylon thread was placed between the road and the regolith layer at the bottom end of the trough, and used to determine sources of the erosive materials by the degree of its exposure. And then the erosion process of the regolith covered road was divided into two stages:1) mere regolith erosion and 2) regolith and road soil mixed erosion.[Result] Results show:(1) The mean runoff rate of regolith on the road with a thin layer of regolith was 1.01-1.52 times at the first stage and 1.26-2.44 times at the second stage that on the road with a thick layer of regolith. When the artificial rainfall was set at 2.5 mm·min-1 in intensity, the average runoff yield per rainfall event was 43.44 L from the road regardless of slope degree, and 37.36%-82.05% higher than that when the rainfall was 1.0-2.0 mm·min-1 in intensity; (2) During the second stage erosion, the average sediment concentration was 227.30 g·L-1 on the road 16° in slope, and about 2.14 times and 1.37 times that on the road 4° in slope and 8° in slope, respectively. Under rainfalls low in intensity (1.0 and 1.5 mm·min-1), sediment yield per rainfall event was high on the road with a thick regolith layer, being about 1.39-2.14 times that on the road with a thin regolith layer; whereas under rainfalls high in intensity (2.0, 2.5 mm·min-1), it was high on the road with a thin regolith layer, being about 1.14-1.67 times that on the road with a thick regolith layer. And under rainfalls 1.0 mm·min-1 in intensity, the average sediment yield per rainfall event on roads regardless of slope degree was 2.08 kg, which equaled to 23.57%-68.59% of that under rainfalls 1.5-2.5 mm·min-1 in intensity; (3) During the second stage erosion and the entire course of a rainfall event, sediment concentration in the runoff was more closely related to runoff rate on the road with a thin regolith layer than on the one with a thick regolith layer.[Conclusion] All the findings in this study may serve as a scientific basis for prevention and control of erosion on regolith-covered earth road erosion in the Loess areas.

    参考文献
    [1] Xu X L,Zhang K L,Liu X C. A review of research on road erosion[J]. Progress in Geography,2006,25(6):52-61.[徐宪立,张科利,刘宪春. 道路侵蚀研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展,2006,25(6):52-61.]
    [2] Zhang K L,Xu X L,Luo L F. Review and prospects on road erosion research[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2008,28(1):119-123.[张科利,徐宪利,罗丽芳. 国内外道路侵蚀研究回顾与展望[J]. 地理科学,2008,28(1):119-123.]
    [3] Liu Z Q,Li C C,Li J,et al. A review on road ecology[J]. Ecological Economy,2015,31(9):170-175.[刘志强,李翠翠,李俊,等. 道路的生态学研究进展[J]. 生态经济,2015,31(9):170-175.]
    [4] Liu S L,Guo X D,Fu B J,et al. Effects of road networks on land ecological security:A case study in a transitional area of the loess plateau[J]. Arid Zone Research,2006,23(1):126-132.[刘世梁,郭旭东,傅伯杰,等. 道路网络对黄土高原过渡区土地生态安全的影响[J]. 干旱区研究,2006,23(1):126-132.]
    [5] Zheng S Q,Zhou B L,Zhao K X. Valley-slope road erosion and its control measures in wangdong gully experimental area located in Changwu County[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,8(3):29-35.[郑世清,周保林,赵克信. 长武王东沟试验区沟坡道路侵蚀及其防蚀措施[J]. 水土保持学报,1994,8(3):29-35.]
    [6] Pereira P,Gimeìnez-Morera A,Novara A,et al. The impact of road and railway embankments on runoff and soil erosion in eastern Spain[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions,2015,12(12):12947-12985
    [7] Huang L,Cheng H X. Study on the soil erosion prediction of highway construction project on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Environmental Science and Technology,2012,35(S2):313-315,333.[黄磊,程璜鑫. 西藏公路建设工程土壤侵蚀预测研究[J]. 环境科学与技术,2012,35(S2):313-315,333.]
    [8] Li Z W,Cai Q G,Wu S A,et al. Simulation study on soil erosion of different underlaying surface in construction period of Nei-Kun Railway[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,15(2):5-8.[李忠武,蔡强国,吴淑安,等. 内昆铁路施工期不同下垫面土壤侵蚀模拟研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2001,15(2):5-8.]
    [9] Zou C X,Shen W S,Zhang H. Soil erosion prediction for construction of Qinghai-Tibetan railway[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,23(6):15-18.[邹长新,沈渭寿,张慧. 新建青藏铁路施工期土壤侵蚀预测[J]. 水土保持通报,2003,23(6):15-18.]
    [10] Navarro-Hevia J,Lima-Farias T R,de Araújo J C,et al. Soil erosion in steep road cut slopes in Palencia(Spain)[J]. Land Degradation & Development,2016,27(2):190-199
    [11] Xi C G,Yang C Y,Xu Z Y. Studies on rules of runoff and sediment yield on the road cutting slope during construction of the railway[J]. China Environmental Science,2002,22(2):174-178.[奚成刚,杨成永,许兆义. 铁路工程施工期路堑边坡面产流产沙规律研究[J]. 中国环境科学,2002,22(2):174-178.]
    [12] Bilby R E,Sullivan K,Duncan S H. The generation and fate of road-surface sediment in forested watersheds in southwestern Washington[J]. Forest Science,1989,35(2):453-468
    [13] Forsyth A R,Bubb K A,Cox M E. Runoff,sediment loss and water quality from forest roads in a southeast Queensland coastal plain Pinus plantation[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2006,221(1/3):194-206
    [14] Ramos-Scharrón C E,MacDonald L H. Runoff and suspended sediment yields from an unpaved road segment,St John,US Virgin Islands[J]. Hydrological Processes,2007,21(1):35-50
    [15] Grace J M,Clinton B D. Protecting soil and water in forest road management[J]. Transactions of the ASABE,2007,50(5):1579-1584
    [16] MacDonald L H,Sampson R W,Anderson D M. Runoff and road erosion at the plot and road segment scales,St John,US Virgin Islands[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2001,26(3):251-272
    [17] Parsakhoo A,Lotfalian M,Kavian A,et al. Prediction of the soil erosion in a forest and sediment yield from road network through GIS and SEDMODL[J]. International Journal of Sediment Research,2014,29(1):118-125
    [18] Grace J M. Soil erosion following forest operations in the Southern Piedmont of central Alabama[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,59(4):160-166
    [19] Shen H O,Liu J,Wang Y,et al. Effects of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on soil erosion characteristics of farmland unpaved road in black soil region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,31(6):123-126.[沈海鸥,刘健,王宇,等. 降雨强度和坡度对黑土区土质道路路面侵蚀特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2017,31(6):123-126.]
    [20] Zheng H J,Yang J,Zhang H J,et al. Field simulated experiment on erosion processes of different farm roads under a heavy rain in red soil region[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery,2012,43(9):85-90,98.[郑海金,杨洁,张洪江,等. 南方红壤区农田道路强降雨侵蚀过程试验[J]. 农业机械学报,2012,43(9):85-90,98.]
    [21] Tian F X,Wang Z L,Zheng S Q,et al. Experiment modeling of soil erosion processes on loess roads based on simulated experiment[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,27(2):1-4,9.[田风霞,王占礼,郑世清,等. 黄土道路侵蚀过程模拟试验研究[J]. 水土保持通报,2007,27(2):1-4,9.]
    [22] Li B,Xu X X,Zhang L D,et al. Rural road erosion controlling design and its performance analysis in the loess hilly region[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,30(2):37-40,45.[李波,徐学选,张良德,等.黄土丘陵区山坡道路防蚀措施设计与效益分析[J]. 水土保持通报,2010,30(2):37-40,45.]
    [23] Megahan W F,Wilson M,Monsen S B. Sediment production from granitic cutslopes on forest roads in Idaho,USA[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2001,26(2):153-163.
    [24] Thompson M,Sessions J,Boston K,et al. Forest road erosion control using multiobjective optimization[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association,2010,46(4):712-723
    [25] Zhang X Z,Wang W L,Yuan Y. Soil erosion of unpaved road and its relationships with runoff characteristics in Shenfu Coalfield Area[J]. Yellow River,2018,40(7):88-92,98.[张孝中,王文龙,袁瀛. 神府矿区土质道路侵蚀及其与径流特性的关系[J]. 人民黄河,2018,40(7):88-92,98.]
    [26] Guo M M,Wang W L,Li J M,et al. Runoff,sediment yield and rill development characteristic of unpaved road in mining area under field artificial simulated rainfall condition[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2016,32(24):155-163.[郭明明,王文龙,李建明,等. 野外模拟降雨条件下矿区土质道路径流产沙及细沟发育研究[J]. 农业工程学报,2016,32(24):155-163.]
    [27] Zhan S,Wang W L,Huang P F,et al. Comparative analysis of hydrodynamic parameters for unpaved road and original ground[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,34(2):1-6.[詹松,王文龙,黄鹏飞,等. 非硬化路面与原生地面侵蚀水动力参数对比研究[J]. 水土保持通报,2014,34(2):1-6.]
    [28] Shi Z H,Chen L D,Yang C C,et al. Soil loss and runoff processes on unpaved road from rainfall simulation tests in the Three Gorges Area,China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2009,29(12):6785-6792.[史志华,陈利顶,杨长春,等. 三峡库区土质道路侵蚀产沙过程的模拟降雨试验[J]. 生态学报,2009,29(12):6785-6792.]
    [29] Shi Z H,Fang N F,Li L,et al. Modeling erosion processes on unpaved roads using KINEROS2[J]. Geographical Research,2010,29(3):408-415.[史志华,方怒放,李璐,等. 应用KINEROS2模型对土质道路侵蚀过程的模拟[J]. 地理研究,2010,29(3):408-415.]
    [30] Li J M,Qin W,Zuo C Q,et al. Processes of earth road regolith erosion in loess area[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2015,26(5):1484-1494.[李建明,秦伟,左长清,等. 黄土区土质道路浮土侵蚀过程[J]. 应用生态学报,2015,26(5):1484-1494.]
    [31] Li J M,Qin W,Zuo C Q,et al. Runoff and sediment yielding for earth road regolith on the loess plateau with simulated rainfall[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,2014,34(9):2337-2345.[李建明,秦伟,左长清,等. 黄土高原土质路浮土径流产沙模拟降雨试验研究[J]. 环境科学学报,2014,34(9):2337-2345.]
    [32] Zhao M,Wang W L,Guo M M,et al. Runoff and sediment yielding characteristics of slopes of stacks of gravels-containing aeolian sandy soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2019,56(4):847-859.[赵满,王文龙,郭明明,等. 含砾石风沙土堆积体坡面径流产沙特征[J]. 土壤学报,2019,56(4):847-859.]
    [33] Wu Q J,Wu J,Wang L H,et al. Effects of soil crustrs on infiltration in slope land in the loess area[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2015,52(2):303-311.[吴秋菊,吴佳,王林华,等. 黄土区坡耕地土壤结皮对入渗的影响[J]. 土壤学报,2015,52(2):303-311.]
    [34] Wang T W,Yu B,Liu Y J,et al. Impacts of road surface shape on soil erosion of rural unpaved road[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2016,32(19):162-168.[王天巍,余冰,刘窑军,等. 农村土质道路路面形态对道路侵蚀的影响[J]. 农业工程学报,2016,32(19):162-168.]
    [35] Chen C H,Zheng S Q,Tian F X,et al. Comparative stimulation research of the erosion process on earth coverd roads in loess hilly region[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(2):45-48,53.[陈翠红,郑世清,田风霞,等. 黄土丘陵区土质裸露路面冲刷过程模拟试验研究[J]. 水土保持研究,2010,17(2):45-48,53.]
    [36] Xu X X,Ju T J,Zheng S Q,et al. Evaluating on the mountain road erosion in loess hilly region under a certain rainfall event[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2007,26(S2):574-578.[徐学选,琚彤军,郑世清,等. 黄土丘陵区次降雨下的山坡道路侵蚀特征分析[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2007,26(S2):574-578.]
    [37] Zheng S Q,Tian F X,Wang Z L,et al. Comparison tests on runoff and sediment yield process from earth road and plant-covered road in loess hilly region[J]. Journal of Sediment Research,2009(4):1-6.[郑世清,田风霞,王占礼,等. 植物路与土质路产流产沙过程的比较试验[J]. 泥沙研究,2009(4):1-6.]
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

纪丽静,王文龙,康宏亮,李建明,史倩华,白芸,聂慧莹,速欢.黄土区薄厚层浮土土质道路降雨侵蚀过程差异[J].土壤学报,2021,58(1):92-105. DOI:10.11766/trxb201908280282 JI Lijing, WANG Wenlong, KANG Hongliang, LI Jianming, SHI Qianhua, BAI Yun, NIE Huiying, SU Huan. Rainfall Erosion Process on Earth Road as Affected by Thickness of the Surface Regolith Layer in Loess Region[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2021,58(1):92-105.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1199
  • 下载次数: 2091
  • HTML阅读次数: 1101
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-28
  • 最后修改日期:2019-10-14
  • 录用日期:2019-12-11
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-08-25
  • 出版日期: 2021-01-11
文章二维码