基于时空变异的旱地土壤有机碳高效采样策略研究
作者:
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(41971050)、福建省自然科学基金项目(2019J01660)、福建省科技计划项目(2017N5006)和福建农林大学国际合作项目(KXGH17017)共同资助


Strategy for Efficient Sampling of Upland Soil Based on Spatiotemporal Variation of the Soil
Author:
Fund Project:

National Science Foundation of China(No. 41971050)、the National Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China(No. 2019J01660)、 the Science and Technology Planning Project of Fujian Province, China(No. 2017N5006) and the International Cooperative Research Program at Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University(No. KXGH17017)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [20]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    土壤有机碳(SOC)空间分布具有时序差异性,明确样点数量对不同时期SOC预测精度影响是制定高效采样策略的基础。选取3.93×104 km2江苏北部旱地作为案例区,运用普通克里金插值方法,分析样点数量对不同时期SOC空间预测精度的影响。结果表明:不同数量样点数据集下1980年苏北旱地SOC预测值与实测值的相关系数r和均方根误差RMSE变幅分别在0.15~0.56和2.09~2.63 g·kg-1之间,当样点数量大于75%时,预测精度较高且能达到相对稳定水平,最佳采样数目在563个左右;而2008年r和RMSE变幅分别在0.24~0.63和2.11~2.62 g·kg-1之间,预测精度对于样点数量的变化更为敏感,70%的样点数量即可达到相对稳定水平,最佳采样数目在526个左右,这表明不同时期SOC空间预测精度对于样点数量变化的响应不同,土壤属性的空间自相关性越大,预测精度对于采样数量的敏感性越强,空间信息达到饱和状态所需样点数量也相对较少;此外,本研究也发现在SOC高、低值等关键区域设置足够的样点数量是提高土壤空间预测效果的重要手段之一。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] Soil organic carbon (SOC) varies sharply with time and space, as it is always subject to influences of various soil-forming factors, natural environmental factors and human activities. So to determine how an appropriate number of sampling sites could affect accuracy of the prediction of SOC in different time periods is the basis for formulating a scientific strategy for high-efficient soil sampling.[Method] In this study, a tract of upland (3.93×104 km2) in North Jiangsu was delineated and selected as a case area, and the Ordinary Kriging interpolation method commonly used in soil science was adopted in analyzing influences of numbers of sampling sites on prediction and mapping of SOC in different time periods. The study was designed to have 20 treatments, which were set in accordance with the principle of 5% decrease in number.[Result] Results show that with the number of soil sampling sites decreasing from 100% to 5%, correlation coefficient (r) between the predicted value and the measured value of SOC in 1980 and in 2008 varied in the range of 0.15-0.56 and 0.24-0.63 and root mean square error in the range of 2.09-2.63 and 2.11-2.62 g·kg-1, respectively. As in 1980, the SOC in the studied region varied quite slightly in spatial autocorrelation and quite drastically and locally, its prediction improved slowly and unsteadily in accuracy, and around 563 samples were needed to make the prediction relatively reliable. However, in 2008, the SOC in the region varied quite sharply in spatial autocorrelation, but mildly locally, and hence its prediction was very sensitive in accuracy to variation of the number of sampling sites. So 526 soil sampling sites were enough to ensure stable prediction accuracy. Standard root mean square errors of the 20 treatments in terms of number of sampling sites varied in the range of 0.34-0.43 and 0.20-0.25 g·kg-1, in 1980 and in 2008, respectively, and spatial prediction was higher in 2008 than in 1980 in accuracy when the numbers of soil sampling sites were the same.[Conclusion] Results of this study indicate that the optimal number of soil sampling sites and their prediction accuracy in the same area are not fixed, but determined in the light of spatial variability of soil attributes, distribution and spatial layout of the sampling sites in each time period. As environment, climate and farmland management practices all vary with time period, SOC content does too in spatial structure and layout, which will greatly affect the optimal number of sampling sites relative to time period.

    参考文献
    [1] Yao X,Yu K Y,Deng Y B,et al. Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon stocks in Masson pine(Pinus massoniana) forests in subtropical China[J]. Catena,2019,178:189-198.
    [2] Huang Y,Sun W J,Zhang W,et al. Changes in soil organic carbon of terrestrial ecosystems in China:A mini -review[J]. Science China Life Sciences,2010,53(7):766-775.
    [3] Yang L,Zhu A X,Qin C Z,et al. A soil sampling method based on representativeness grade of sampling points[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2011,48(5):938-946.[杨琳,朱阿兴,秦承志,等. 一种基于样点代表性等级的土壤采样设计方法[J]. 土壤学报,2011,48(5):938-946.]
    [4] Long J,Liu Y L,Xing S H,et al. Effects of sampling density on interpolation accuracy for farmland soil organic matter concentration in a large region of complex topography[J]. Ecological Indicators,2018,93:562-571.
    [5] Vašát R,Heuvelink G B M,Borůvka L. Sampling design optimization for multivariate soil mapping[J]. Geoderma,2010,155(3/4):147-153.
    [6] Kerry R,Oliver M A. Comparing sampling needs for variograms of soil properties computed by the method of moments and residual maximum likelihood[J]. Geoderma,2007,140(4):383-396.
    [7] Hai N,Zhao Y C,Tian K,et al. Effect of number of sampling sites on characterization of spatial variability of soil organic matter[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2015,52(4):783-791.[海南,赵永存,田康,等. 不同样点数量对土壤有机质空间变异表达的影响[J]. 土壤学报,2015,52(4):783-791.]
    [8] Shi Z,Li Y. Application of geostatistics in soil science[J]. Beijing:China Agriculture Press,2006.[史舟,李艳. 地统计学在土壤学中的应用[J]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2006.]
    [9] Wang G X,Zhang L M,Li X D,et al. Study of soil organic carbon sequestration rate and potential of upland in northern Jiangsu Province based on high-resolution soil database[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences,2016,25(3):422-431.[王光翔,张黎明,李晓迪,等. 基于高精度土壤数据库的苏北旱地固碳速率和潜力研究[J]. 生态环境学报,2016,25(3):422-431.]
    [10] Zhang L M,Zhuang Q L,Li X D,et al. Carbon sequestration in the uplands of Eastern China:An analysis with high-resolution model simulations[J]. Soil and Tillage Research,2016,158:165-176.
    [11] Zhang L M,Li J J,Yu D S,et al. Map scale effects on soil total phosphorus storage for uplands of China[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences,2011,20(11):1626-1633.[张黎明,李加加,于东升,等. 不同制图比例尺土壤数据库对旱地磷储量估算的影响[J]. 生态环境学报,2011,20(11):1626-1633.]
    [12] Zhang L M,Liu Y L,Li X D,et al. Effects of soil map scales on simulating soil organic carbon changes of upland soils in Eastern China[J]. Geoderma,2018,312:159-169.
    [13] Yin L X. Characteristics of spatial variability and effect of various spatial interpolation methods for soil chemistry properties of cultivated land in Tong-an County[D]. Fuzhou:College of Resources and Environment,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,2006.[尹兰香. 同安区耕地土壤化学性质空间变异特征及插值模型效果的研究[D]. 福州:福建农林大学资源与环境学院,2006.]
    [14] Cochran W G. Sampling Techniques.3rd ed. New York:John Wiley and Sons,1977.
    [15] Cheng D Q,Wu Z F,Liu X B,et al. Influences of sample density on spatial prediction of soil organic matter content:A case study from Fengqiu County,Henan Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2013,44(4):844-850.[程道全,巫振富,刘晓冰,等. 样点密度对土壤有机质空间预测结果的影响——以河南封丘县土壤为例[J]. 土壤通报,2013,44(4):844-850.]
    [16] Li K,Zhao H F,Wu K N,et al. Suitable interpolation method and reasonable sampling quantity of Cd pollution index in soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2016,47(5):1056-1064.[李凯,赵华甫,吴克宁,等. 土壤重金属Cd污染指数的适宜插值方法和合理采样数量研究[J]. 土壤通报,2016,47(5):1056-1064.]
    [17] Wu Z F,Zhao Y F,Cheng D Q,et al. Influences of sample size and spatial distribution on accuracy of predictive soil mapping on a county scale[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2019,56(6):1321-1335.[巫振富,赵彦锋,程道全,等. 样点数量与空间分布对县域尺度土壤属性空间预测效果的影响[J]. 土壤学报,2019,56(6):1321-1335.]
    [18] Ma L F,Xiong H G,Sun D,et al. Research on a spatial optimal interpolation method of soil organic matter under different degrees of disturbance[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(19):7153-7160.[马利芳,熊黑钢,孙迪,等. 不同干扰程度下土壤有机质空间最优插值法研究[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(19):7153-7160.]
    [19] Wang J F,Haining R,Cao Z D. Sample surveying to estimate the mean of a heterogeneous surface:Reducing the error variance through zoning[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science,2010,24(4):523-543.
    [20] Jiang C S,Wang J F,Cao Z D. A review of geo-spatial sampling theory[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2009,64(3):368-380.[姜成晟,王劲峰,曹志冬. 地理空间抽样理论研究综述[J]. 地理学报,2009,64(3):368-380.]
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

姚彩燕,刘绍贵,乔婷,龙军,于东升,史学正,邢世和,陈瀚阅,张黎明.基于时空变异的旱地土壤有机碳高效采样策略研究[J].土壤学报,2021,58(3):638-648. DOI:10.11766/trxb201911150515 YAO Caiyan, LIU Shaogui, QIAO Ting, LONG Jun, YU Dongsheng, SHI Xuezheng, XING Shihe, CHEN Hanyue, ZHANG Liming. Strategy for Efficient Sampling of Upland Soil Based on Spatiotemporal Variation of the Soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2021,58(3):638-648.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1030
  • 下载次数: 3287
  • HTML阅读次数: 1587
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-15
  • 最后修改日期:2020-01-16
  • 录用日期:2020-03-03
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-12-08
  • 出版日期: 2021-05-11
文章二维码