秸秆还田配施控释掺混尿素对玉米产量和土壤肥力的影响
作者:
中图分类号:

S158.2

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目课题(2017YFD0200706)、山东省重点研发计划项目(2019GNC106011)和山东省研究生导师指导能力提升项目(SDYY18108)共同资助


Effects of Straw Returning Combined with Application of Mixture of Controlled-Release Urea and Common Urea on Maize Yield and Soil Fertility
Author:
Fund Project:

Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFD0200706), the Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province of China (No. 2019GNC106011) and the Graduate Tutor Ability Improvement Project of Shandong Province of China (No. SDYY18108)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [36]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    探讨秸秆还田配施控释掺混尿素对玉米产量和土壤肥力的影响,为其科学合理配伍提供依据。2014—2018年开展了控释掺混尿素(硫加树脂包膜尿素:树脂包膜尿素:普通尿素为3.5:3.5:3)应用于夏玉米(Zea mays L.,郑单958)的田间长期定位试验。试验设6个处理:1)不施氮且秸秆不还田处理(CK1);2)不施氮但秸秆还田处理(CK2);3)普通尿素但秸秆不还田处理(BBF1);4)普通尿素且秸秆还田处理(BBF2);5)控释掺混尿素但秸秆不还田处理(CRF1);6)控释掺混尿素且秸秆还田处理(CRF2)。成熟期测定叶面积指数(LAI)和叶片叶绿素相对含量测定值(SPAD),调查玉米产量和产量构成,同时取0~20 cm土壤样品测定相关土壤肥力状况。结果表明:1)BBF2相比BBF1处理,5年平均玉米产量和氮素累积利用率显著提高5.9%和13.3%;CRF2、CRF1相比BBF2处理玉米5年平均产量分别显著提高12.0%和4.2%,氮素累积利用率分别显著提高57.3%和42.4%;2)较2013年基础土壤,2018年玉米收获季CRF2、BBF2、CRF1和BBF1处理土壤有机质含量分别提高33.5%、25.9%、19.5%和11.4%,全氮含量分别提高26.6%、18.6%、9.9%和7.0%;3)秸秆还田的CRF2、BBF2较同类肥料秸秆不还田的CRF1、BBF1处理,土壤有机质含量分别显著提高11.8%、13.0%,全氮含量分别显著提高15.2%、10.9%;4)较BBF1处理,CRF1处理的土壤硝态氮、铵态氮、有效磷和速效钾分别显著提高52.0%、18.6%、19.5%和24.7%;秸秆长期还田进一步提高了土壤养分含量,CRF2土壤硝态氮、铵态氮、有效磷和速效钾含量分别显著提高66.3%、25.2%、47.5%和30.4%。本试验条件下,秸秆还田配施控释掺混尿素可协同增效,显著提高土壤肥力、玉米产量、氮素累积利用率和净收益。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] Effects of straw returning coupled with application of the mixture of controlled-release urea(CRU) and common urea on maize yield and soil fertility were investigated, in an attempt to provide a scientific basis for rationalizing the application.[Method] A long-term field experiment from 2014 to 2018 was conducted to investigate effects of application of the mixture fertilizer consisting of sulfur and polymer-coated urea, polymer coated urea, and normal urea at a ratio of 3.5:3.5:3 in terms of N to summer maize (Zea mays L., Zhengdan 958) on yield. The experiment was designed to have six treatments:1) No nitrogen applied or straw returning (CK1); 2) No nitrogen applied in addition to straw returning (CK2); 3) Common urea applied only (BBF1); 4) Common urea applied in addition to straw returning(BBF2); 5) Application of the mixture only (CRF1); and 6) Mixture applied in addition to straw returning (CRF2). At the mature stage, soil samples were collected from the 0-20 cm soil layer of each plot for analysis, and LAI, SPAD, yield and yield composition of the maize were measured.[Result] Results show that:1) Treatment BBF2 was 5.9% and 13.3% higher than Treatment BBF1 in 5-year mean of grain yield and accumulative N use efficiency (ANUE), respectively, and Treatment CRF2 and CRF1 was 12.0% and 4.2% higher in maize yield, and 57.3% and 42.4% higher in accumulative N use efficiency, respectively, than Treatment BBF2; 2) The soil samples collected from Treatments CRF2、BBF2、CRF1 and BBF1 at the maize harvest stage in 2018 were 33.5%, 25.9%, 19.5% and 11.4%, respectively, higher in soil organic matter content, 26.6%, 18.6%, 9.9% and 7.0%, respectively, higher in soil total nitrogen content than their respective samples collected in 2013; 3) Treatment CRF2 and BBF2 was 11.8% and 13.0% higher in soil organic matter content, 15.2% and 10.9%, higher in total nitrogen content, respectively, than Treatment CRF1 and BBF1; 4) Treatment CRF1 was 52.0%, 18.6%, 19.5% and 24.7% higher in soil NO3--N, NH4+-N, available phosphorus and available potassium content, respectively, than Treatment BBF1, indicating that straw returning further increased soil nutrient content. Treatment CRF2 was 66.3%, 25.2%, 47.5% and 30.4%, higher, respectively, in soil NO3--N, NH4+-N, available phosphorus and available potassium content than Treatment BBF1.[Conclusion] All the findings demonstrate that long-term application of the mixture of urea fertilizers coupled with straw returning can significantly improve maize yield, ANUE, net income and soil fertility due to their synergistic interactions.

    参考文献
    [1] Liu S P, Nie X T, Zhang H C, et al. Effects of tillage and straw returning on soil fertility and grain yield in a wheat-rice double cropping system[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2006, 22(7):48-51.[刘世平, 聂新涛, 张洪程, 等. 稻麦两熟条件下不同土壤耕作方式与秸秆还田效用分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22(7):48-51.]
    [2] Zhao P, Chen F. Effects of straw mulching plus nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen efficiency and grain yield in winter wheat[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(6):1014-1018.[赵鹏, 陈阜. 秸秆还田配施化学氮肥对冬小麦氮效率和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(6):1014-1018.]
    [3] Li T, He C E, Ge X Y, et al. Responses of soil mineral N contents, enzyme activities and crop yield to different C/N ratio mediated by straw retention and N fertilization[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(12):1633-1642.[李涛, 何春娥, 葛晓颖, 等. 秸秆还田施氮调节碳氮比对土壤无机氮、酶活性及作物产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(12):1633-1642.]
    [4] Kumar K, Goh K M. Nitrogen release from crop residues and organic amendments as affected by biochemical composition[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2003, 34(17/18):2441-2460.
    [5] Singh B, Rengel Z. The role of crop residues in improving soil fertility[M]//Marschner P, Rengel Z. Nutrient Cycling in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Berlin Heidelberg:Springer, 2007:183-214
    [6] Li T, Ge X Y, He C E, et al. Mixing alfalfa straw and maize straw to enhance nitrogen mineralization, microbial biomass and enzyme activity:A laboratory study[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2016, 17(8):1869-1874.[李涛, 葛晓颖, 何春娥, 等. 苜蓿秸秆配施玉米秸秆还田对氮矿化、微生物生物量和酶活性的影响[J]. 农业科学与技术, 2016, 17(8):1869-1874.]
    [7] Zhang S Y, Wang H Z, Yang M D, et al. Influence of returning corn stalks to field under different soil moisture contents on root growth and water use efficiency of wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(13):2484-2496.[张素瑜, 王和洲, 杨明达, 等. 水分与玉米秸秆还田对小麦根系生长和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(13):2484-2496.]
    [8] Yuan M M, Wu G, Hu R, et al. Effects of straw returning plus fertilization on crop yield and fertilizer use efficiency in rice-rapeseed rotation system[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018, 37(12):3597-3604.[袁嫚嫚, 邬刚, 胡润, 等. 稻油轮作下秸秆还田配施化肥对作物产量及肥料利用率的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(12):3597-3604.]
    [9] Zhang H Y, Niu L A, Hao J M, et al. Effects of straw returning combined with slow release fertilizer on soil nutrient and crop yield[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2018, 49(1):140-149.[张华艳, 牛灵安, 郝晋珉, 等. 秸秆还田配施缓控释肥对土壤养分和作物产量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2018, 49(1):140-149.]
    [10] Shaviv A. Advances in controlled-release fertilizers[M]//Advances in Agronomy. Amsterdam:Elsevier, 2001:1-49.
    [11] Zheng W K, Liu Z G, Zhang M, et al. Improving crop yields, nitrogen use efficiencies, and profits by using mixtures of coated controlled-released and uncoated urea in a wheat-maize system[J]. Field Crops Research, 2017, 205(6):106-115.
    [12] Dong Y L, Li Z F, Wang R L, et al. Study on the problems and countermeasures of returning wheat and corn stalks into the soil in North China[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2018(1):159-163.[董印丽, 李振峰, 王若伦, 等. 华北地区小麦、玉米两季秸秆还田存在问题及对策研究[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018(1):159-163.]
    [13] Zhou H Y, Zhang M, Liu Z G, et al. Maize yield and economic return with controlled-release urea[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2019, 115(3):427-440.
    [14] Bao S D. Soil and agro-chemistry analysis[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing:China Agriculture Press, 2000.[鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2000.]
    [15] Tian C Y, Lin Z A, Zuo Y B, et al. Review on several concepts on fertilizer nitrogen recovery rate and its calculation[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2011, 42(6):1530̵#8212;1536.[田昌玉, 林治安, 左余宝, 等. 氮肥利用率计算方法评述[J]. 土壤通报, 2011, 42(6):1530-1536.]
    [16] Zheng W K, Zhang M, Liu Z G, et al. Combining controlled-release urea and normal urea to improve the nitrogen use efficiency and yield under wheat-maize double cropping system[J]. Field Crops Research, 2016, 197(197):52-62.
    [17] Chen J Q, Zhang M, Yang Y C. Study on nutrient releasing characteristics of membrane wrapping control-releasing fertilizer[J]. Chemical Fertilizer Design, 2006, 44(2):56-58.[陈剑秋, 张民, 杨越超. 包膜控释肥养分释放特性的研究[J]. 化肥设计, 2006, 44(2):56-58.]
    [18] Yang X, Wu L H, Wu S F, et, al. Nitrogen release characteristic of polymer coated urea in paddy soil and its relationship with cumulative temperature[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(2):199-204.[杨锌, 吴良欢, 伍少福, 等. 树脂包膜尿素在稻田中的释放特征及与积温的关系[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(2):199-204.]
    [19] Kochba M, Ayalon O, Avnimelech Y. Slow release rate:Individual granules and population behaviour[J]. Fertilizer Research, 1994, 39(1):39-42.
    [20]
    [20] Yang Y C, Zhang M, Chen J Q, et al. Nutrient release characteristics of polymer-sulphur coated urea[J]. Chemical Fertilizer Industry, 2006, 33(1):26-30.[杨越超, 张民, 陈剑秋, 等. 聚合物硫包尿素的养分释放特征[J]. 化肥工业, 2006, 33(1):26-30.]
    [21] Zheng W K, Sui C L, Liu Z G, et al. Long-term effects of controlled-release urea on crop yields and soil fertility under wheat-corn double cropping systems[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2016, 108(4):1703-1716.
    [22] Jiang C Q, Zheng Q S, Zu C L. Research progress on effects of straw returning on soil potassium and its substitute for potassium fertilizer[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(4):1158-1165.[姜超强, 郑青松, 祖朝龙. 秸秆还田对土壤钾素的影响及其替代钾肥效应研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(4):1158-1165.]
    [23] Hodge A, Robinson D, Fitter A. Are microorganisms more effective than plants at competing for nitrogen?[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2000, 5(7):304-308.
    [24] Chen H Q, Fan M S, Billen N, et al. Effect of land use types on decomposition of 14C-labelled maize residue(Zea mays L.)[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2009, 45(2):123-130.
    [25] Shi Y, Jiang A Q, Dai C C, et al. Advanced in microbiological mechanism and application of straw degradation[J]. Journal of Microbiology, 2002, 22(1):47-50.[史央, 蒋爱芹, 戴传超, 等. 秸秆降解的微生物学机理研究及应用进展[J]. 微生物学杂志, 2002, 22(1):47-50.]
    [26] Guan S Y. Soil enzymes and its research methods[M]. Beijing:Agriculture Press, 1986.[关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京:农业出版社, 1986.]
    [27] Liu Y G, Lin Q, Wang Y F, et al. Effects of coupling of straw-return and nitrogen fertilizer on photosynthetic characters and yield of winter wheat[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2007, 15(1):42-44.[刘义国, 林琪, 王月福, 等. 秸秆还田与氮肥耦合对冬小麦光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2007, 15(1):42-44.]
    [28] Wen L Y, Xue Y F, Zhang H, et al. The characteristics of nitrogen translocation of maize inbred lines with different nitrogen efficiency from anthesis to meturity[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2019, 25(4):568-578.[温立玉, 薛艳芳, 张慧, 等. 不同氮效率玉米品种亲本自交系花粒期氮素转运特性[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(4):568-578.]
    [29] Xue B, Yin Z Y, Xiao Q, et al. Effects of long-term straw returning on soil fertility under rice rape rotation system[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(7):134-141.[薛斌, 殷志遥, 肖琼, 等. 稻-油轮作条件下长期秸秆还田对土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(7):134-141.]
    [30] Cong P. Fertilization effect and mechanism of subsoil under high dosage straw returning in black soil of Northeast China[D]. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2019.[丛萍. 秸秆高量还田下东北黑土亚耕层的培肥效应与机制[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2019.]
    [31] Mao X L, Lu K P, He L Z, et al. Effect of long-term fertilizer application on distribution of aggregates and aggregate-associated organic carbon in paddy soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015, 52(4):828-838.[毛霞丽, 陆扣萍, 何丽芝, 等. 长期施肥对浙江稻田土壤团聚体及其有机碳分布的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(4):828-838.]
    [32] Lu J Y, Zhang S R, Li T, et al. Study on spatial distribution of available phosphorus and potassium in Tianquan River basin[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 24(4):1409-1414.[卢俊宇, 张世熔, 李婷, 等. 天全河流域土壤速效磷钾的空间分布特征研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2011, 24(4):1409-1414.]
    [33] Wang G H, Zhao Y, Zhou D R, et al. Review of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2003(1):96-101.[王光华, 赵英, 周德瑞, 等. 解磷菌的研究现状与展望[J]. 生态环境, 2003(1):96-101.]
    [34] Wu J G, Lü Y, Wang M H, et al. Study on decomposition of organic fertilizers by FTIR[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2004, 10(3):259-266.[吴景贵, 吕岩, 王明辉, 等. 有机肥腐解过程的红外光谱研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2004, 10(3):259-266.]
    [35] Cui J Y, Ren L, Wang J G, et al. Effect of organic acids on mobilization of K from K-bearing minerals and stochastic simulation of dynamic K release[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2002, 39(3):341-350.[崔建宇, 任理, 王敬国, 等. 有机酸影响矿物钾释放的室内试验与数学模拟[J]. 土壤学报, 2002, 39(3):341-350.]
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

高永祥,李若尘,张民,周洪印,郑文魁,陈德清,刘之广.秸秆还田配施控释掺混尿素对玉米产量和土壤肥力的影响[J].土壤学报,2021,58(6):1507-1519. DOI:10.11766/trxb202003100702 GAO Yongxiang, LI Ruochen, ZHANG Min, ZHOU Hongyin, ZHENG Wenkui, CHEN Deqing, LIU Zhiguang. Effects of Straw Returning Combined with Application of Mixture of Controlled-Release Urea and Common Urea on Maize Yield and Soil Fertility[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2021,58(6):1507-1519.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1261
  • 下载次数: 2778
  • HTML阅读次数: 1497
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-10
  • 最后修改日期:2020-07-25
  • 录用日期:2020-10-14
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-12-10
  • 出版日期: 2021-11-11
文章二维码