水分管理对水稻籽粒硒积累及根际土壤细菌群落多样性的影响
作者:
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(31672238)和重庆市基础科学与前沿技术研究项目(cstc2017jcyjAX0425)资助


Effects of Water Management on Selenium Accumulation in Rice Grains and Bacterial Community Diversity in Rhizosphere Soil
Author:
Fund Project:

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.31672238) and the Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology of Chongqing City in China (No.cstc2017jcyjAX0425)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [35]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    采用盆栽试验方法,研究不同水分管理方式对水稻根际土壤硒组分、籽粒硒积累以及根际土壤细菌群落多样性的影响。结果表明:在水稻的各生育期,好氧和干湿交替较淹水灌溉一定程度上提高了土壤pH和氧化还原电位(Eh),土壤水溶态和可交换态硒含量增加,从而提高了土壤硒的有效性。水稻成熟后,不同部位的含硒量由高到低依次为根(1.38~2.22 mg·kg-1)、叶(0.55~0.85 mg·kg-1)、茎(0.53~0.61 mg·kg-1)和籽粒(0.15~0.53 mg·kg-1)。水稻籽粒含硒量以干湿交替灌溉最高,淹水灌溉最低,二者含硒量差异达显著水平。干湿交替灌溉的水稻产量显著高于常规淹水灌溉,且较淹水灌溉提高了7.83%,较好氧灌溉提高13.51%。水稻根际土壤优势菌为变形菌门、绿弯菌门、拟杆菌门、酸杆菌门、Patescibacteria和芽单胞菌门,变形菌门是不同水分管理方式下水稻根际土壤中丰度最高的细菌,水分管理措施显著影响其丰富度,干湿交替和好氧灌溉中变形菌门的丰富度明显高于淹水灌溉。从纲水平看,Gammaproteobacteria的丰度与土壤有效硒含量呈正相关,故Gammaproteobacteria丰度的增加可能是土壤硒生物有效性增加的另一个重要原因。综上,干湿交替灌溉不但能提高水稻产量和稻米硒含量,且较正常淹水管理节约用水,在水稻生产中,是一种优先推荐的水分管理方法。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] For this paper a pot experiment was conducted to evaluate effects of water management varying in pattern on composition of soil selenium, bacterial community diversity in rhizosphere soil and Se accumulation in grains of rice, and further to explore mechanism of water management affecting the absorption and accumulation of selenium in rice, so as to provide considerable theoretical and practical support to effective regulation of selenium transfer from rice field to agricultural products, to meet the demand of human for selenium nutrient and health.[Method] The experiment was designed to have three treatments in water management treatments, that is, (I) flooded irrigation(F); (II) aerobic irrigation(A); and (III) alternation of flooded and aerobic irrigation (AFA), and three replicates for each treatment. Starting from D20 (20 days after rice transplanting), soil pH and Eh were measured every 12 days. The selenium in the rhizosphere soil was fractionated at the tillering stage, heading stage and maturity stage of the crop. Content of selenium in rice roots, stems, leaves and grains as well as yield of the crop were measured at maturity. Before rice harvest, the fresh soil in the rhizosphere bag was retrieved and placed in a bag, which was then sealed and stored at low temperature (-80℃) for high-throughput sequencing analysis.[Result] Results show that at all the rice growth stages, Treatments A and AFA were higher than Treatment F in soil pH and Eh to a certain extent and in content of soluble and exchangeable selenium as well, thereby in availability of soil selenium. In terms of selenium content, the organs of a rice plant exhibited an order of root (1.38-2.22 mg·kg-1) > leaf (0.55-0.85 mg·kg-1) > stem (0.53-0.61 mg·kg-1) > grain (0.15-0.53 mg·kg-1). Treatment AFA was the highest in selenium content in rice grains, while Treatment F was the lowest. The difference between the two was obvious. Treatment AFA was significantly or 7.83% higher than Treatment F and 13.51% higher than Treatment A in grain yield. The dominant species of bacteria in the rhizosphere soil of rice were Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi, Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, Patescibacteria and Gemmatimonadetes, with Proteobacteria being the most abundant one in rice rhizosphere soil in all the treatments. Obviously water management had a significant impact on richness of the bacteria. Treatments AFA and A were significantly higher than Treatment F in richness of Proteobacteria. On the level of class, abundance of Gammaproteobacteria was positively related to content of available Se in the soil, so the increase in the former may be deemed as an important reason for higher bioavailability of selenium in the soil.[Conclusion] Comprehensive analysis shows that alternation of flooded and aerobic irrigation can not only improve yield and selenium content of rice grains, but also save water for irrigation as compared to normal flooding irrigation. Therefore it can be recommended as preferential water management method in rice production.

    参考文献
    [1] Combs G F. Selenium in global food systems[J]. British Journal of Nutrition, 2001, 85(5):517-547.
    [2] Williams P N, Lombi E, Sun G X, et al. Selenium characterization in the global rice supply chain[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(15):6024-6030.
    [3] Zhou X B, Shi W M, Yang L Z. Effect of foliar application of selenite on selenium accumulation and distribution in rice[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2007, 44(1):73-78.[周鑫斌, 施卫明, 杨林章. 叶面喷硒对水稻籽粒硒富集及分布的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2007, 44(1):73-78.]
    [4] Masscheleyn P H, Delaune R D, Patrick W H. Transformations of selenium as affected by sediment oxidation-reduction potential and pH[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1990, 24(1):91-96.
    [5] Lyubenova L, Sabodash X, Schröder P, et al. Selenium species in the roots and shoots of chickpea plants treated with different concentrations of sodium selenite[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015, 22(21):16978-16986.
    [6] Shahid M, Niazi N K, Khalid S, et al. A critical review of selenium biogeochemical behavior in soil-plant system with an inference to human health[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2018, 234:915-934.
    [7] Neal R H, Sposito G. Selenate adsorption on alluvial soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1989, 53(1):70-74.
    [8] Li H F, Lombi E, Stroud J L, et al. Selenium speciation in soil and rice:Influence of water management and Se fertilization[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2010, 58(22):11837-11843.
    [9] Bao Q L, Xiao K Q, Chen Z, et al. Methane production and methanogenic archaeal communities in two types of paddy soil amended with different amounts of rice straw[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2014, 88(2):372-385.
    [10] Mostafazadehfard F B, Jafari F, Mousavi S, et al. Effects of irrigation water management on yield and water use efficiency of rice in cracked paddy soils[J]. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2010, 4(3):136-141.
    [11] Lu R K. Analytical methods for soil and agro-chemistry[M]. China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2000:125-233.[鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科学技术出版社, 2000:125-233.]
    [12] Qu J G, Xu B X, Gong S C. Sequential extraction techniques for determination of selenium speciation in soils and sediments[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 1997, 16(3):277-283.[瞿建国, 徐伯兴, 龚书椿. 连续浸提技术测定土壤和沉积物中硒的形态[J]. 环境化学, 1997, 16(3):277-283.]
    [13] Zhang L H, Shi W M, Wang X C. Difference in selenite absorption between high- and low-selenium rice cultivars and its mechanism[J]. Plant and Soil, 2006, 282(1/2):183-193.
    [14] Chao A N, Yang M C K. Stopping rules and estimation for recapture debugging with unequal failure rates[J]. Biometrika, 1993, 80(1):193-201.
    [15] Faith D P. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity[J]. Biological Conservation, 1992, 61(1):1-10.
    [16] Hill M O. Diversity and evenness:A unifying notation and its consequences[J]. Ecology, 1973, 54(2):427-432.
    [17] Barrow N J, Whelan B R. Testing a mechanistic model. VII. The effects of pH and of electrolyte on the reaction of selenite and selenate with a soil[J]. Journal of Soil Science, 1989, 40(1):17-28.
    [18] Jayaweera G R, Biggar J W. Role of redox potential in chemical transformations of selenium in soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1996, 60(4):1056-1063.
    [19] Zhang D, Dong T, Ye J, et al. Selenium accumulation in wheat(Triticum aestivum L) as affected by coapplication of either selenite or selenate with phosphorus[J]. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2017, 63(1):37-44.
    [20] Bajaj M, Eiche E, Neumann T, et al. Hazardous concentrations of selenium in soil and groundwater in North-West India[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 189(3):640-646.
    [21] Funwie A V. Effect of soil properties on availability and mobility of selenium[D]. Faculty of Bioscience Engineering. University of Gent, Belgium, 2012:1-65.
    [22] Peng Q, Wang M K, Cui Z W, et al. Assessment of bioavailability of selenium in different plant-soil systems by diffusive gradients in thin-films(DGT)[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2017, 225:637-643.
    [23] Armstrong W. The oxidising activity of roots in waterlogged soils[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 1967, 20(4):920-926.
    [24] Shiba H, Daimon H. Histological observation of secondary aerenchyma formed immediately after flooding in Sesbania cannabina and S. rostrata[J]. Plant and Soil, 2003, 255(1):209-215.
    [25] Zhang S F. Effect of alternate wetting and drying on the growth and development, grain yield and quality of rice[D]. Yangzhou, Jiangsu:Yangzhou University, 2009.[张慎凤. 干湿交替灌溉对水稻生长发育、产量与品质的影响[D]. 江苏扬州:扬州大学, 2009.]
    [26] Huang Q, Wang J L, Wang C, et al. The 19-years inorganic fertilization increased bacterial diversity and altered bacterial community composition and potential functions in a paddy soil[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2019, 144:60-67.
    [27] Kersters K, de Vos P, Gillis M, et al. Introduction to the proteobacteria[M]//The Prokaryotes. New York, NY:Springer New York, 2006:3-37.
    [28] Weller D M. Pseudomonas biocontrol agents of soilborne pathogens:Looking back over 30 years[J]. Phytopathology, 2007, 97(2):250-256.
    [29] Muyzer G, Stams A J M. The ecology and biotechnology of sulphate-reducing bacteria[J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2008, 6(6):441-454.
    [30] Ding L J, Su J Q, Xu H J, et al. Long-term nitrogen fertilization of paddy soil shifts iron-reducing microbial community revealed by RNA-13C-acetate probing coupled with pyrosequencing[J]. The ISME Journal, 2015, 9(3):721-734.
    [31] Karagöz K, Ateş F, Karagöz H, et al. Characterization of plant growth-promoting traits of bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of grapevine grown in alkaline and acidic soils[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2012, 50:144-150.
    [32] Long Y C, Chen X, Zhou S Q. Isolation, identification and assessment on selenium biofortification of siderophore-producing rhizobacteria[J]. Current Biotechnology, 2017(5):402-408.[龙云川, 陈轩, 周少奇. 高产铁载体根际菌的筛选鉴定及硒活化特性评价[J]. 生物技术进展, 2017(5):402-408.]
    [33] Kragelund C, Caterina L, Borger A, et al. Identity, abundance and ecophysiology of filamentous Chloroflexi species present in activated sludge treatment plants[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2007, 59(3):671-682.
    [34] Wegner C E, Liesack W. Microbial community dynamics during the early stages of plant polymer breakdown in paddy soil[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2016, 18(9):2825-2842.
    [35] Fierer N, Jackson R B. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006, 103(3):626-631.
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

王瑞昕,杨静,方正,张思宇,周鑫斌.水分管理对水稻籽粒硒积累及根际土壤细菌群落多样性的影响[J].土壤学报,2021,58(6):1574-1584. DOI:10.11766/trxb202004090050 WANG Ruixin, YANG Jing, FANG Zheng, ZHANG Siyu, ZHOU Xinbin. Effects of Water Management on Selenium Accumulation in Rice Grains and Bacterial Community Diversity in Rhizosphere Soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2021,58(6):1574-1584.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:825
  • 下载次数: 2378
  • HTML阅读次数: 1318
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-09
  • 最后修改日期:2020-06-28
  • 录用日期:2020-09-21
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-12-10
  • 出版日期: 2021-11-11
文章二维码