不同整地措施坡面土壤水分时空分布特征
作者:
中图分类号:

S157.1

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划课题(2017YFC0505405)资助


Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Soil Moisture on Slopes Relative to Land Preparation Measure
Author:
Fund Project:

National Key R&D Program of China(2017YFC0505405)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [31]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    了解不同整地措施的梯田果园土壤水分的时空异质性及影响机制对提升林果产业发展具有重要意义。以赣南小洋小流域脐橙果园开发示范区内的3种典型的土地利用结构坡面(优化整地坡面、粗放整地坡面、未整地荒草地坡面)和4种土地利用类型(优化整地果园、粗放整地果园、荒草地、农地)为研究对象,研究其在0~100 cm土壤剖面上的水分时空分布特征及主控地形因子。结果表明:不同土地利用类型土壤含水量在雨季表现为农地>粗放整地果园>优化整地果园>荒草地,果园之间无显著差异,其他土地利用之间差异均显著(P<0.05);在旱季为农地>优化整地果园>粗放整地果园>荒草地,荒草地和粗放整地果园土壤含水量大幅降低,要显著低于优化整地果园(P<0.05)。在不同坡位,雨季与旱季土壤含水量从坡顶到坡脚均表现为逐渐升高趋势,且坡上、中、下部位的差异均很小。通过冗余分析也发现雨季和旱季土壤水分异质性的主控因子分别为坡位和土地利用类型(P<0.01),均通过表层(0~20 cm)土壤来影响水分分布。整地措施对坡面土壤水分的空间异质性提升明显,且显著提升了坡面在雨季对降雨的入渗能力,同时优化整地措施显著提升了梯田表层土壤在旱季的蓄水保水能力。研究结论可为区域内整地措施空间布局优化以及水土流失的综合治理提供理论依据。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] How to arrange rationally land preparation measures on terraced slopes affects runoff generation, rainfall infiltration, and water conservation capacity, thereon. It's of great significance to understand the spatio-temporal heterogeneity of soil moisture in terraced orchards different in land preparation measure and its mechanism, for promoting development of the forest and fruit industry.[Method] For this paper, the navel orange orchard development demonstration area in the small watershed of Xiaoyang in a low hilly red soil region in South China is selected as the research area. Three slopes, typical of the area, but different in land use structure (optimally prepared terraced slope, extensively prepared terraced slope, and unprepared waste grassland slope) and four types of land use (orchard on optimally prepared terraced slope, orchard on extensively prepared terraced slope, waste grassland, and cropland) were selected as the research objects for the study on spatio-temporal distribution of soil water relative to land preparation and land use. Soil water content in five soil layers (0~20, 20~40, 40~60, 60~80 and 80~100 cm) at five slope positions (top slope, upper slope, middle slope, lower slope, and toe slope) on all the four slopes was monitored in both seasons (rainy and dry season). And redundant analysis was performed to determine the main terrain factors (including slope position, slope, land use type and altitude) that affect spatio-temporal distribution of soil water content in different seasons and soil layers.[Result] Results show:1) soil water content during the rainy season varied with land use of a slope, exhibiting an order of slope of cropland (0.4088 m3·m-3) > orchard on extensively prepared terraced slope (0.3227 m3·m-3) > orchard on optimally prepared terraced slope (0.3078 m3·m-3) > slope of waste grassland (0.2739 m3·m-3). Apparently, the two orchards did not differ much, but did significantly from the other two. During the dry season, soil water content decreased much faster in the slope of waste grassland and the orchard on extensively prepared terraced slope than in the two. On the slope of farmland, the impact of slope position on soil water content was the least. In terms of soil water content during the dry season, the four slopes followed a decreasing order of slope of cropland (0.3524 m3·m-3) > orchard on optimally prepared terraced slope (0.1980 m3·m-3) > orchard extensively prepared terraced slope (0.1475 m3·m-3) > slope of waste grassland (0.1380 m3·m-3). Obviously the last two were much lower than the first two. 2) Soil water content gradually increased along the slope from the top to the toe, during both the rainy and dry seasons, but differed slightly between the upper, middle and lower parts of the three slopes, however, spatial heterogeneity intensified significantly after land preparation of the slopes. 3) The main topographic factors affecting the distribution of soil water content during the rainy season were slope position (P=0.002) and land use (P=0.048), and during the dry season were land use (P=0.008), slope position (P=0.024) and altitude (P=0.024), however, slope gradient was an insignificant one.[Conclusion] In general, land preparation of the slopes significantly increased rain water infiltration capacity and hence soil water content of the surface (0~20 cm) soil layer during the rainy season, especially in the orchard on the optimally prepared terraced slope, where the water storage and retention capacity was significantly improved during the dry season. All the findings in this study may serve as a scientific basis for rational arrangement of land resources in the region, optimization of the spatial layout of soil and water conservation measures, and comprehensive soil erosion control.

    参考文献
    [1] Vereecken H, Kamai T, Harter T, et al. Explaining soil moisture variability as a function of mean soil moisture:A stochastic unsaturated flow perspective[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2007, 34(22):L22402.
    [2] Schmidt J P, Sripada R P, Beegle D B, et al. Within-field variability in optimum nitrogen rate for corn linked to soil moisture availability[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2011, 75(1):306-316.
    [3] Li X Z, Shao M A, Jia X X, et al. Profile distribution of soil-water content and its temporal stability along a 1340-m long transect on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Catena, 2016, 137:77-86.
    [4] Chen Z F, Zhang X X. Effect of seasonal drought on forestry and fruit industry at red soil region in Southern China[J]. Agro-Environmental Protection, 2002, 21(3):241-244.[陈正法,张茜茜. 我国南方红壤区季节性干旱及对林果业的影响[J]. 农业环境保护, 2002, 21(3):241-244.]
    [5] Guo D L, Mou P, Jones R H, et al. Temporal changes in spatial patterns of soil moisture following disturbance:An experimental approach[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2002, 90(2):338-347.
    [6] Qiu Y, Fu B J, Wang J, et al. Soil moisture variation in relation to topography and land use in a hillslope catchment of the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2001, 240(3/4):243-263.
    [7] Western A W, Blöschl G. On the spatial scaling of soil moisture[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1999, 217(3/4):203-224.
    [8] Ali G A, Roy A G, Legendre P. Spatial relationships between soil moisture patterns and topographic variables at multiple scales in a humid temperate forested catchment[J]. Water Resources Research, 2010, 46(10):2290-2296.
    [9] Western A W, Zhou S L, Grayson R B, et al. Spatial correlation of soil moisture in small catchments and its relationship to dominant spatial hydrological processes[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2004, 286(1/4):113-134.
    [10] Sun F X, Lü Y H, Fu B J, et al. Spatial explicit soil moisture analysis:Pattern and its stability at small catchment scale in the loess hilly region of China[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2014, 28(13):4091-4109.
    [11] Dick J, Tetzlaff D, Bradford J, et al. Using repeat electrical resistivity surveys to assess heterogeneity in soil moisture dynamics under contrasting vegetation types[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2018, 559:684-697.
    [12] Korres W, Reichenau T G, Fiener P, et al. Spatio-temporal soil moisture patterns-A meta-analysis using plot to catchment scale data[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 520:326-341.
    [13] Liu B X, Shao M G. Response of soil water dynamics to precipitation years under different vegetation types on the northern Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2016, 8(1):47-59.
    [14] Penna D, Brocca L, Borga M, et al. Soil moisture temporal stability at different depths on two alpine hillslopes during wet and dry periods[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2013, 477:55-71.
    [15] Zhao Y, Peth S, Wang X Y, et al. Controls of surface soil moisture spatial patterns and their temporal stability in a semi-arid steppe[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2010, 24(18):2507-2519.
    [16] Zhang W, Chen H S, Wang K L, et al. Spatial variability of surface soil water in typical depressions between hills in Karst region in dry season[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2006, 43(4):554-562.[张伟,陈洪松,王克林,等. 喀斯特地区典型峰丛洼地旱季表层土壤水分空间变异性初探[J]. 土壤学报, 2006, 43(4):554-562.]
    [17] Li J Y, Wang Y P, Han M Y, et al. Soil moisture dynamics of apple orchards in Loess Hilly Area of northern Shaanxi Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(5):749-758.[李佳旸, 王延平,韩明玉,等. 陕北黄土丘陵区山地苹果园的土壤水分动态研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(5):749-758.]
    [18] Zou Y J, Chen J X, Ma F W, et al. Characteristics of soil moisture change of apple orchards of different plangting years in Weibei dryland[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2011, 29(1):41-43, 47.[邹养军,陈金星,马锋旺,等. 渭北旱塬不同种植年限苹果园土壤水分的变化特征[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2011, 29(1):41-43, 47.]
    [19] Wei W, Feng X R, Yang L, et al. The effects of terracing and vegetation on soil moisture retention in a dry hilly catchment in China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 647:1323-1332.
    [20] Widomski M K. Terracing as a measure of soil erosion control and its effect on improvement of infiltration in eroded environment[M]//Soil Erosion Issues in Agriculture, 2011:315-334
    [21] Wu Y Q, Liu B Y, Erikvanden E, et al. Automatic measurement for soil water content on Loess Plateau- TDR system and its application[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2001, 15(2):108-111.[伍永秋, 刘宝元, Erikvanden Elsen,等. 黄土高原土壤水分的自动监测——TDR系统及其应用[J]. 水土保持学报, 2001, 15(2):108-111.]
    [22] Hu W, Shao M G, Han F P, et al. Watershed scale temporal stability of soil water content[J]. Geoderma, 2010, 158(3/4):181-198.
    [23] She D L, Shao M A, Yu S E. Spatial variability of soil water content on a cropland-grassland mixed slope land in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery,2010,41(7):57-63.[佘冬立,邵明安,俞双恩. 黄土区农草混合利用坡面土壤水分空间变异性[J]. 农业机械学报, 2010, 41(7):57-63.]
    [24] Tenge A J, de graaff J, Hella J P. Financial efficiency of major soil and water conservation measures in West Usambara Highlands, Tanzania[J]. Applied Geography, 2005, 25(4):348-366.
    [25] Mei X M, Zhu Q K, Ma L, et al. Effect of stand origin and slope position on infiltration pattern and preferential flow on a Loess hillslope[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2018, 29(5):1353-1365.
    [26] Huang Y L, Li Z B, Su H, et al. Effect of man-made forest on soil moisture of different slopes in upper and lower reaches of small watershed of Loess Plateau[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(15):108-116.[黄艳丽,李占斌,苏辉,等. 人工林对黄土高原小流域上下游不同坡面土壤水分的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(15):108-116.]
    [27] Guo X X, Fu Q, Lu H, et al. Spatial variability and its controlling factors of soil moisture on cropland-forestland mixed hillslope in black soil area of Northeast China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(19):123-130.[郭欣欣,付强,卢贺,等. 东北黑土区农林混合利用坡面土壤水分空间异质性及主控因素[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(19):123-130.]
    [28] Lü H, Zhu Y H, Skaggs T H, et al. Comparison of measured and simulated water storage in dryland terraces of the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2009, 96(2):299-306.
    [29] Fu B J, Wang J, Chen L D, et al. The effects of land use on soil moisture variation in the Danangou catchment of the Loess Plateau,China[J]. Catena,2003,54(1/2):197-213.
    [30] Zhang C, Chen H S, Nie Y P, et al. Dynamics of soil profile water content in peak-cluster depression areas in Karst region[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2013, 21(10):1225-1232.[张川,陈洪松,聂云鹏, 等. 喀斯特地区洼地剖面土壤含水率的动态变化规律[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(10):1225-1232.]
    [31] Shi J Y, Wang G L, Liu G B. Effect of graining for green on water content of soil profile under different land use patterns in the Loess Plateau[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 25(2):81-86.[史君怡, 王国梁,刘国彬. 退耕还林(草)对黄土高原不同土地利用方式下土壤剖面水分含量的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(2):81-86.]
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

程谅,焦雄,邸涵悦,熊翱宇,郭忠录.不同整地措施坡面土壤水分时空分布特征[J].土壤学报,2021,58(6):1423-1435. DOI:10.11766/trxb202002270076 CHENG Liang, JIAO Xiong, DI Hanyue, XIONG Aoyu, GUO Zhonglu. Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Soil Moisture on Slopes Relative to Land Preparation Measure[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2021,58(6):1423-1435.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1119
  • 下载次数: 2440
  • HTML阅读次数: 4206
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-27
  • 最后修改日期:2020-06-01
  • 录用日期:2020-09-22
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-12-08
  • 出版日期: 2021-11-11
文章二维码