基于in vitro试验的中国典型土壤中砷的健康风险及影响因素
作者:
中图分类号:

X53;X820.4

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(41807116)、福建省自然科学基金项目(2019J05035)和福建省中青年教师教育科研项目(JT180022)共同资助


In Vitro Test-based Study on Health Risks of Arsenic in Typical Soils of China and Their Influencing Factors
Author:
Fund Project:

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41807116), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (No. 2019J05035) and the Middle-aged and Young Teachers’ Educational Research Project of Fujian Province of China (No. JT180022)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [39]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    采集中国红壤、黑土、褐土、棕壤和黄壤五种典型土壤,经一个月老化制备成浓度为600 mg·kg-1的砷污染土壤样品,利用体外(in vitro)试验方法(PBET-UF模型)研究经口部摄入的土壤砷在人体胃肠道的生物可给性/生物有效性,并评估其健康风险,进而从土壤性质角度(包括土壤基本理化特性及砷的赋存形态)综合地探讨砷的生物可给性/生物有效性的影响因素,以分析不同土壤间差异的原因。结果表明,土壤砷在胃阶段的生物可给性为37.2%~71.8%,小肠阶段的生物可给性为49.0%~73.3%,小肠阶段的生物有效性为48.6%~72.1%,各类型土壤间差异极显著;土壤砷从胃到小肠是一个逐步被消化溶出的过程,且小肠中溶解态砷均可透过模拟小肠上皮细胞的专用超滤膜;各类型土壤经口部摄入的砷健康风险存在极显著差异,致癌风险和非致癌风险分别超过相应可接受限值两个数量级和一个数量级;此外,土壤砷的生物可给性/生物有效性与土壤pH、游离氧化铁铝含量、迁移系数S及迁移系数W存在显著或极显著相关性,迁移系数S是影响土壤砷在胃阶段的生物可给性的主导因子,土壤pH为影响其在小肠阶段的生物可给性/生物有效性的主导因子,而游离氧化铁铝则主要通过与砷形成新矿物的方式降低其在土壤中的活性及生物可给性/生物有效性。本研究的成果将为后续开展更符合现实土壤污染情形的调查及重(类)金属污染土壤健康风险评估手段的完善做出积极贡献。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] This study aimed at accurate assessment of health risks of arsenic (As) in typical soils of China and comprehensive investigation of their influencing factors, based on oral bioaccessibility/bioavailability of soil As.[Method] Samples of five typical soils of the country, i.e. red soil, black soil, cinnamon soil, brown soil and yellow soil, were collected and prepared into As-contaminated samples by spiking As at 600 mg·kg-1. After one-month aging, bioaccessibility/bioavailability of soil As in the gastrointestinal tract of a human being were studied, and its health risk was evaluated by means of in vitro test (PBET-UF model). Besides, from the perspective of soil properties (soil basic physicochemical properties and As fractions), influencing factors of As bioaccessibility/bioavailability were explored and variation of As bioaccessibility/bioavailability with the soil analyzed.[Result] Results show that As bioaccessibility/bioavailability significantly varied between soils, as As bioaccessibility ranged from 37.2% to 71.8% in the gastric phase and from 49.0% to 73.3% in the small intestinal phase, while As bioavailability in the small intestinal phase ranged from 48.6% to 72.1%. It was indicated that from the stomach to the small intestine soil As was gradually dissolved by digestive fluids, and almost all the dissolved As in the small intestine could pass through the specific ultrafiltration membrane used to simulate small intestinal epithelium. Also, health risks of soil As through oral ingestion significantly varied with the soil. Based on the estimated As bioaccessibility in the gastric phase, carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks of As in the five soils varied in the range of 4.28×10-4~8.26×10-4and in the range of 14.86~28.69, respectively; and based on the estimated As bioavailability in the small intestinal phase, they did in the range of 5.59×10-4~8.30×10-4and in the range of 19.40~28.81, respectively. The carcinogenic risk and non-carcinogenic risk was two orders and one order of magnitude respectively higher than their respective acceptable limit. In addition, correlation analysis shows that between bioaccessibility/bioavailability of soil As was significantly related to certain soil properties.[Conclusion] Oral bioaccessibility/bioavailability of soil As is significantly and positively related to soil pH, migration coefficientS and migration coefficientW, but negatively to content of free Fe and Al oxides. Migration coefficientS is the main influencing factor determining bioaccessibility of soil As in the gastric phase, whereas soil pH is in the small intestinal phase. Although free Fe and Al oxides in the soils are not the determining factors directly affecting bioaccessibility/bioavailability of soil As in the gastric phase, they form new minerals with As, thus reducing the activity and consequent bioaccessibility/bioavailability of soil As. It is expected that all the findings in this study may contribute positively to making future field investigations of soil environmental quality of China more in line with the reality, and consummation of the methodologies for health risk assessment of heavy metal (loid) -contaminated soil.

    参考文献
    [1] Zhao F J, Xie W Y, Wang P. Soil and human health[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2020, 57(1):1-11.[赵方杰, 谢婉滢, 汪鹏. 土壤与人体健康[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(1):1-11.]
    [2] Yager J W, Greene T, Schoof R A. Arsenic relative bioavailability from diet and airborne exposures:Implications for risk assessment[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 536:368-381.
    [3] Mohammed Abdul K S, Jayasinghe S S, Chandana E P S, et al. Arsenic and human health effects:A review[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2015, 40(3):828-846.
    [4] Ministry of Ecology and Environment. Soil environmental quality-Risk control standard for soil contamination of development land:GB36600-2018[S]. Beijing:China Environment Press, 2019.[生态环境部.土壤环境质量建设用地土壤污染风险管控标准:GB36600-2018[S]. 北京:中国环境出版社, 2019.]
    [5] Ministry of Ecology and Environment. Technical guidelines for risk assessment of soil contamination of land for construction:HJ25.3-2019[S]. Beijing:China Environment Press, 2019.[生态环境部.建设用地土壤污染风险评估技术导则:HJ25.3-2019[S]. 北京:中国环境出版社, 2019.]
    [6] Li H B, Li J, Zhu Y G, et al. Comparison of arsenic bioaccessibility in housedust and contaminated soils based on four in vitro assays[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 532:803-811.
    [7] Bradham K D, Diamond G L, Burgess M, et al. In vivo and in vitro methods for evaluating soil arsenic bioavailability:Relevant to human health risk assessment[J]. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 2018, 21(2):83-114.
    [8] Yin N Y, Cai X L, Du H L, et al. In vitro study of soil arsenic release by human gut microbiota and its intestinal absorption by Caco-2 cells[J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 168:358-364.
    [9] Ruby M V, Davis A, Schoof R A, et al. Estimation of lead and arsenic bioavailability using a physiologically based extraction test[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1996, 30(2):422-430.
    [10] Chen X C, Niu J, Cui Y S. In vitro digestion/centrifugal ultrafiltration to determine the oral bioavailability of lead in soils[J]. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 2012, 10(1):681-684.
    [11] Das S, Jean J S, Kar S. Bioaccessibility and health risk assessment of arsenic in arsenic-enriched soils, Central India[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2013, 92:252-257.
    [12] Juhasz A L, Smith E, Weber J, et al. In vitro assessment of arsenic bioaccessibility in contaminated(anthropogenic and geogenic) soils[J]. Chemosphere, 2007, 69(1):69-78.
    [13] Suriyagoda L D B, Dittert K, Lambers H. Arsenic in rice soils and potential agronomic mitigation strategies to reduce arsenic bioavailability:A review[J]. Pedosphere, 2018, 28(3):363-382.
    [14] Qin J H, Nworie O E, Lin C X. Particle size effects on bioaccessible amounts of ingestible soil-borne toxic elements[J]. Chemosphere, 2016, 159:442-448.
    [15] Cui Y S, Chen X C. Lead(Pb) and arsenic(As) bioaccessibility in various soils from South China[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2011, 177(1/2/3/4):481-492.
    [16] Sarkar D, Makris K C, Parra-Noonan M T, et al. Effect of soil properties on arsenic fractionation and bioaccessibility in cattle and sheep dipping vat sites[J]. Environment International, 2007, 33(2):164-169.
    [17] Yin N Y, Cui Y S, Zhang Z N, et al. Bioaccessibility and dynamic dissolution of arsenic in contaminated soils from Hunan, China[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2015, 15(3):584-593.
    [18] Lu R K. Analytical methods for soil and agro-chemistry[M]. Beijing:China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2000.[鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科学技术出版社, 2000.]
    [19] Kim E J, Yoo J C, Baek K. Arsenic speciation and bioaccessibility in arsenic-contaminated soils:Sequential extraction and mineralogical investigation[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2014, 186:29-35.
    [20] An L H, Liu M C, Zhang J Q, et al. Sources of arsenic in soil and affecting factors of migration and release:A review[J]. Soils, 2020, 52(2):234-246.[安礼航, 刘敏超, 张建强, 等. 土壤中砷的来源及迁移释放影响因素研究进展[J]. 土壤, 2020, 52(2):234-246.]
    [21] Liu G N, Chen M, Li W Q, et al. A critical review on the speciation and development of sequential extraction procedures for arsenic in soils[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2018, 37(12):2629-2638.[刘冠男, 陈明, 李悟庆, 等. 土壤中砷的形态及其连续提取方法研究进展[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(12):2629-2638.]
    [22] Li S W, Li J, Li H B, et al. Arsenic bioaccessibility in contaminated soils:Coupling in vitro assays with sequential and HNO3 extraction[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 295:145-152.
    [23] Smith E, Naidu R, Weber J, et al. The impact of sequestration on the bioaccessibility of arsenic in long-term contaminated soils[J]. Chemosphere, 2008, 71(4):773-780.
    [24] Silvetti M, Garau G, Demurtas D, et al. Influence of lead in the sorption of arsenate by municipal solid waste composts:Metal(loid) retention, desorption and phytotoxicity[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 225:90-98.
    [25] Hendershot W H, Duquette M. A simple Barium chloride method for determining cation exchange capacity and exchangeable cations[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1986, 50(3):605-608.
    [26] Klute A. Methods of soil analysis[M]. Madison, WI, USA:Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, 1986.
    [27] Shiowatana J, McLaren R G, Chanmekha N, et al. Fractionation of arsenic in soil by a continuous-flow sequential extraction method[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2001, 30(6):1940-1949.
    [28] Wenzel W W, Kirchbaumer N, Prohaska T, et al. Arsenic fractionation in soils using an improved sequential extraction procedure[J]. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2001, 436(2):309-323.
    [29] Lu C, Li Q Q, Luo Q S, et al. Stabilization treatment of available arsenic in contaminated soils and mechanism studies[J]. China Environmental Science, 2013, 33(2):298-304.[卢聪, 李青青, 罗启仕, 等. 场地土壤中有效态砷的稳定化处理及机理研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2013, 33(2):298-304.]
    [30] Rodriguez R R, Basta N T, Casteel S W, et al. An in vitro gastrointestinal method to estimate bioavailable arsenic in contaminated soils and solid media[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1999, 33(4):642-649.
    [31] Fu J, Cui Y S. In vitro model system to evaluate the influence of pH and soil-gastric/intestinal juices ratio on bioaccessibility of Pb, Cd and As in two typical contaminated soils[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2012, 31(2):245-251.[付瑾, 崔岩山. In vitro系统评价胃肠液pH及土液比对铅、镉、砷生物可给性的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2012, 31(2):245-251.]
    [32] Wang J C, Sun J C, Huang G X, et al. Research on speciation and bioavailability of arsenic in soil[J]. Earth and Environment, 2011, 39(1):32-36.[王金翠, 孙继朝, 黄冠星, 等. 土壤中砷的形态及生物有效性研究[J]. 地球与环境, 2011, 39(1):32-36.]
    [33] Mercer K L, Tobiason J E. Removal of arsenic from high ionic strength solutions:Effects of ionic strength, pH, and preformed versus in situ formed HFO[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(10):3797-3802.
    [34] Yin N Y, Du H L, Zhang Z N, et al. Variability of arsenic bioaccessibility and metabolism in soils by human gut microbiota using different in vitro methods combined with SHIME[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 566/567:1670-1677.
    [35] Juhasz A L, Smith E, Nelson C, et al. Variability associated with as in vivo-in vitro correlations when using different bioaccessibility methodologies[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(19):11646-11653.
    [36] Zhang R, Yu G H, Li Y Q. Effects of long-term fertilization regimes on as accumulation in upland red earth and the crops growing on it[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Science, 2018, 39(4):1901-1909.[张蓉, 余光辉, 李亚青. 长期施肥对旱地红壤及作物中砷累积的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(4):1901-1909.]
    [37] Wang S L, Mulligan C N. Natural attenuation processes for remediation of arsenic contaminated soils and groundwater[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2006, 138(3):459-470.
    [38] Zhong S X, He H F, Chen Z L, et al. Advancement in study on biochemical behavior of arsenic in flooded paddy soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2018, 55(1):1-17.[钟松雄, 何宏飞, 陈志良, 等. 水淹条件下水稻土中砷的生物化学行为研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 2018, 55(1):1-17.]
    [39] Rahman M S, Clark M W, Yee L H, et al. Arsenic solid-phase speciation and reversible binding in long-term contaminated soils[J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 168:1324-1336.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

陈晓晨,黄振佳,陈雨晴,尧聪聪,张剑宇,刁国旺,袁菁,徐开钦,刘宪华.基于in vitro试验的中国典型土壤中砷的健康风险及影响因素[J].土壤学报,2022,59(1):172-182. DOI:10.11766/trxb202005140100 CHEN Xiaochen, HUANG Zhenjia, CHEN Yuqing, YAO Congcong, ZHANG Jianyu, DIAO Guowang, YUAN Ching, XU Kaiqin, LIU Xianhua.In Vitro Test-based Study on Health Risks of Arsenic in Typical Soils of China and Their Influencing Factors[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2022,59(1):172-182.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:801
  • 下载次数: 2054
  • HTML阅读次数: 1954
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-14
  • 最后修改日期:2020-09-03
  • 录用日期:2020-10-14
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-12-10
  • 出版日期: 2022-01-11
文章二维码