拟合方式对酸碱滴定法测定土壤酸缓冲容量准确性的影响
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S153.4

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(41701256)、重庆市博士后项目(Xm2016076)和重庆市硕士研究生科研创新项目(CYS19125)资助


Influence of Fitting Method on the Accuracy of Measuring Soil Acid Buffering Capacity by Acid-base Titration
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41701256), the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Chongqing in China (No. Xm2016076) and the Master Science Foundation of Chongqing in China (No. CYS19125)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    酸碱滴定法是测定土壤酸碱缓冲容量的主要方法。该方法中酸碱滴定数据点的拟合方式对测得的土壤酸碱缓冲容量结果影响极大。为此,采用酸碱滴定法对38个酸性紫色土的酸缓冲容量进行测定,分别采用4种拟合方式(整段多项式曲线拟合、突跃范围内线性拟合、酸段多项式曲线拟合、酸段线性拟合)对酸碱滴定数据进行拟合并计算得到土壤的酸缓冲容量,比较分析了不同拟合方式计算得到的土壤酸缓冲容量的可靠性和准确度。结果表明:不同拟合方式获得的酸缓冲容量差异较大;不同拟合方式获得的曲线方程的决定系数(R2)不同,酸段线性拟合方式得到的R2显著低于其他三种拟合方式,计算得到的酸缓冲容量的准确度较低;整段多项式曲线拟合方式获得的方程对酸碱滴定数据的拟合度最佳。进一步分析发现,4种拟合方式计算得到的酸缓冲容量与交换性盐基总量(r1)和有效阳离子交换量(ECEC,r2)间的相关性由大到小依次为:整段多项式曲线拟合(r1=0.486**r2=0.525**)、突跃范围内线性拟合(r1=0.223,r2=0.245)、酸段多项式曲线拟合(r1=0.183,r2=0.220)、酸段线性拟合(r1=-0.219,r2=0.002),整段多项式曲线拟合算得的酸缓冲容量与土壤当前所处的阳离子交换和硅酸盐缓冲关系最为密切。综合得出,4种拟合方式中,整段多项式曲线拟合计算得到的酸缓冲容量的可靠性和准确度最好,有助于土壤酸减缓冲性能的准确测定。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] pH buffering capacity (pHBC) highlights the capacity of a soil to resist changes in soil solution pH as the concentration of protons (H+) changes. The most widely used method for determining soil pHBC is acid-base titration. The soil pHBC can be calculated from a buffering curve showing the relationship between H+ concentration and soil solution pH. Nevertheless, the fitting method of titration data has a penetrating influence on the result of soil pHBC and needs to be investigated.[Method] In this study, acid-base titration curve was adopted to measure the pHBC of 38 acid purple soils. Four fitting methods (polynomial curve fitting of all data (PA), linear fitting of data between two inflection points (LT), polynomial curve fitting of acid titration data (PAT), and linear fitting of acid titration data (LAT)) were used to fit the soil acid-base titration data and the pHBC estimated from the different fitting methods.[Result] The pHBC obtained by the different fitting methods was different. Also, the different fitting methods produced different R2 for the fitting equation. The R2 obtained by LAT was lower than that of the other three fitting methods, which result in lower accuracy of the soil pHBC calculated by linear fitting of acid-base titration data. More so, PA produced the best fit for the acid-base titration data. The correlation between soil pHBC calculated by the different fitting methods and soil exchangeable cations(r1) or effective cation exchange capacity (ECEC, r2) was as follows:PA(r1=0.486**, r2=0.525**) > LT(r1=0.223, r2=0.245) > PAT(r1=0.183, r2=0.220)> LAT(r1=-0.219, r2=0.002). There was a significant positive relationship between soil pHBC calculated by the PA method and soil exchangeable cations or ECEC. This revealed that the pH buffering ability of the tested soils at current pH value was mainly controlled by exchangeable cations and weathering of silicate.[Conclusion] Given the importance of soil pHBC, an accurate method for its measurement is essential. Thus, estimating pHBC of soils by fitting the acid-base titration data using PA is a reliable method.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘莉,程永毅,李忠意,谢德体.拟合方式对酸碱滴定法测定土壤酸缓冲容量准确性的影响[J].土壤学报,2022,59(2):509-516. DOI:10.11766/trxb202007230301 LIU Li, CHENG Yongyi, LI Zhongyi, XIE Deti. Influence of Fitting Method on the Accuracy of Measuring Soil Acid Buffering Capacity by Acid-base Titration[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2022,59(2):509-516.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-23
  • 最后修改日期:2020-12-28
  • 录用日期:2021-03-03
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-03-04
  • 出版日期: 2022-02-11