典型水稻土细菌亚类群——泛化种、特化种的群落构建及功能潜力
作者:
中图分类号:

Q142;S154.3

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(31870500)、国家科技基础性工作专项(2015FY110700)和江苏省农业科技自主创新资金项目(CX(20)2003)资助


Community Assembly and Functional Potential of Habitat Generalists and Specialists in Typical Paddy Soils
Author:
Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31870500),the Special Project on the Basis of National Science and Technology of China (No. 2015FY110700) and Jiangsu Agriculture Science and Technology Innovation Fund (No. CX(20)2003)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [56]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    泛化种和特化种对碳及养分等资源利用存在很大差异,在土壤能量和养分循环中发挥着独特功能。目前农田微生物研究主要针对整个细菌、真菌、古菌或其他功能群落,对农田生态系统细菌泛化种和特化种的认识还很缺乏。因此,为探究典型水稻土细菌泛化种和特化种的群落结构、驱动机制及在氮循环中的功能,根据第二次土壤普查数据,从我国东部(江苏、安徽、上海)和西南部(贵州、云南)采集16个土壤表层样品(0~20 cm),进行理化性质测定和高通量测序,并对获得的数据进行相应的生态学分析。结果表明,在所有的OTUs中,3.28%被归为泛化种,9.07%被归为特化种。泛化种和特化种在门水平的分布模式不同,特化种在绿弯菌门(Chloroflexi)、放线菌门(Actinobacteria)、硝化螺旋菌门(Nitrospirae)、厚壁菌门(Firmicutes)和浮霉菌门(Planctomycetes)中所占的比例高于泛化种。基于β多样性零模型的群落构建分析表明,泛化种与特化种均由确定性过程主导,与特化种相比,泛化种受随机性过程的影响更大。驱动泛化种和特化种群落结构变异的环境因子不同,pH、年均降雨量、黏粒含量、全氮是驱动泛化种群落结构变异的主导因素,而特化种群落结构变异由pH和黏粒含量主导。对泛化种和特化种的共现网络和鲁棒性分析发现,特化种网络联系更多、结构更复杂、鲁棒性更强。FAPROTAX功能预测发现,生物固氮功能主要存在于泛化种中。本研究在细菌亚群落层面研究典型水稻表层土细菌泛化种和特化种的群落结构、环境驱动因子、构建过程、共现网络特性和氮循环相关功能,为稻田细菌群落演变和调控提供了理论依据。

    Abstract:

    【Objective】Great differences exist in the utilization of carbon and nutrients between habitat generalists and specialists, which play unique roles in the cycle of soil energy and nutrients. At present, the research on farmland microorganisms mainly focuses on the whole bacteria, fungi, archaea or other functional communities, and the understanding of habitat generalists and specialists in farmland ecosystems is still lacking. Therefore, this study was designed to explore the community structure, assembly mechanism and possible functions of habitat generalists and specialists in typical paddy soils in eastern and southwestern China. 【Method】Sixteen surface soil samples (0~20 cm) were collected from the eastern area (Jiangsu, Anhui, Shanghai) and southwestern area (Guizhou and Yunnan) of China according to the data of the second soil survey, and their physico-chemical properties and next generation high-throughput sequencing were analyzed. 【Result】The results showed that 3.28% of all OTUs were classified as habitat generalists while 9.07% as habitat specialists. There were significant differences in species composition between habitat generalists and specialists. At the level of phylum, the proportions of habitat specialists in Chloroflexi, Actinobacteria, Nitrospirae, Firmicutes and Planctomycetes were higher than those of habitat generalists. The analysis of the community assembly process based on the β diversity null model showed that habitat generalists and specialists were dominated by deterministic process. Compared with habitat specialists, habitat generalists were more affected by the stochastic process. The environmental factors driving the community structure variation of habitat generalists and specialists were different. pH, mean annual precipitation, clay content and total nitrogen were the main factors driving the community structure variation of habitat generalists, while the community structure variation of habitat specialists was dominated by pH and clay content. By analyzing the co-occurrence network and robustness of habitat generalists and specialists, it was found that the habitat specialists’ network had more connections, more complexed structure and stronger robustness. The functional prediction by FAPROTAX showed that biological nitrogen fixation mainly existed in habitat generalists. 【Conclusion】Information derived from the community structure, environmental driving factors, assembly process, co-occurrence network characteristics and related functions of nitrogen metabolism of habitat generalists and specialists, provides a theoretical basis for the evolution and regulation of bacterial communities in paddy fields.

    参考文献
    [1] Delgado-Baquerizo M,Bardgett R D,Vitousek P M,et al. Changes in belowground biodiversity during ecosystem development[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2019,116(14):6891-6896.
    [2] Nagelkerke C J,Menken S B J. Coexistence of habitat specialists and generalists in metapopulation models of multiple-habitat landscapes[J]. Acta Biotheoretica,2013,61(4):467-480.
    [3] Sriswasdi S,Yang C C,Iwasaki W. Generalist species drive microbial dispersion and evolution[J]. Nature Communications,2017,8:1162.
    [4] Clavel J,Julliard R,Devictor V. Worldwide decline of specialist species:Toward a global functional homogenization?[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2011,9(4):222-228.
    [5] Klaus J M,Noss R F. Specialist and generalist amphibians respond to wetland restoration treatments[J]. The Journal of Wildlife Management,2016,80(6):1106-1119.
    [6] Therriault T W,Kolasa J. Patterns of community variability depend on habitat variability and habitat generalists in natural aquatic microcosms[J]. Community Ecology,2000,1(2):195-203.
    [7] Luo Z M,Liu J X,Zhao P Y,et al. Biogeographic patterns and assembly mechanisms of bacterial communities differ between habitat generalists and specialists across elevational gradients[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2019,10:169. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00169.
    [8] Liao J Q,Cao X F,Zhao L,et al. The importance of neutral and niche processes for bacterial community assembly differs between habitat generalists and specialists[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology,2016,92(11):fiw174.
    [9] Hu A Y,Wang H J,Cao M X,et al. Environmental filtering drives the assembly of habitat generalists and specialists in the coastal sand microbial communities of Southern China[J]. Microorganisms,2019,7(12):598.
    [10] Liu W J,Graham E B,Zhong L H,et al. Dynamic microbial assembly processes correspond to soil fertility in sustainable paddy agroecosystems[J]. Functional Ecology,2020,34(6):1244-1256.
    [11] Li P F,Li W T,Dumbrell A J,et al. Spatial variation in soil fungal communities across paddy fields in subtropical China[J]. mSystems,2020,5(1),https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00704-19.
    [12] Watanabe T,Kimura M,Asakawa S. Community structure of methanogenic Archaea in paddy field soil under double cropping(rice-wheat)[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2006,38(6):1264-1274.
    [13] Bai R,Wang J T,Deng Y,et al. Microbial community and functional structure significantly varied among distinct types of paddy soils but responded differently along gradients of soil depth layers[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2017,8:945.
    [14] Zhou J Z,Ning D L. Stochastic community assembly:Does it matter in microbial ecology? Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews,2017,81(4):32.
    [15] Chase J M,Myers J A. Disentangling the importance of ecological niches from stochastic processes across scales[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences,2011,366(1576):2351-2363.
    [16] Assress H A,Selvarajan R,Nyoni H,et al. Diversity,Co-occurrence and implications of fungal communities in wastewater treatment plants[J]. Scientific Reports,2019,9:14056.
    [17] Barberan A,Bates S T,Casamayor E O,et al. Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities. Isme Journal,2012,6(2):343-351
    [18] de Vries F T,Manning P,Tallowin J R B,et al. Abiotic drivers and plant traits explain landscape-scale patterns in soil microbial communities[J]. Ecology Letters,2012,15(11):1230-1239.
    [19] Jiang Y J,Liu M Q,Zhang J B,et al. Nematode grazing promotes bacterial community dynamics in soil at the aggregate level[J]. The ISME Journal,2017,11(12):2705-2717.
    [20] Ma B,Wang H Z,Dsouza M,et al. Geographic patterns of co-occurrence network topological features for soil microbiota at continental scale in Eastern China[J]. The ISME Journal,2016,10(8):1891-1901.
    [21] Iyer S,Killingback T,Sundaram B,et al. Attack robustness and centrality of complex networks[J]. PLoS One,2013,8(4):e59613. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059613.
    [22] Liang M X,Liu F Z,Gao C,et al. Robustness analysis of the complex network[C]//20176th Data Driven Control and Learning Systems(DDCLS). May 26-27,2017,Chongqing,China. IEEE,2017:638-643.
    [23] Hayatsu M,Tago K,Saito M. Various players in the nitrogen cycle:Diversity and functions of the microorganisms involved in nitrification and denitrification[J]. Soil Science & Plant Nutrition,2008,54(1):33-45.
    [24] Lu R K. Analytical methods for soil and agro-chemistry[M]. Beijing:China Agricultural Science and Technology Press,2000. 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2000.
    [25] Yang Y C,Li M,Li H,et al. Specific and effective detection of anammox bacteria using PCR primers targeting the 16S rRNA gene and functional genes[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2020,734:139387.
    [26] Caporaso J G,Kuczynski J,Stombaugh J,et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data[J]. Nature Methods,2010,7(5):335-336.
    [27] Huse S M,Huber J A,Morrison H G,et al. Accuracy and quality of massively parallel DNA pyrosequencing[J]. Genome Biology,2007,8(7):R143.
    [28] Edgar R C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST[J]. Bioinformatics,2010,26(19):2460-2461.
    [29] Pandit S N,Kolasa J,Cottenie K. Contrasts between habitat generalists and specialists:An empirical extension to the basic metacommunity framework[J]. Ecology,2009,90(8):2253-2262.
    [30] Dixon P. VEGAN,a package of R functions for community ecology[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science,2003,14(6):927-930.
    [31] Tucker C M,Shoemaker L G,Davies K F,et al. Differentiating between niche and neutral assembly in metacommunities using null models of β-diversity[J]. Oikos,2016,125(6):778-789.
    [32] Csxardi G,Nepusz T. The igraph software package for complex network research. 2006
    [33] Bastian M,Heymann S,Jacomy M. Gephi:An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. 2014
    [34] Blondel V D,Guillaume J L,Lambiotte R,et al. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks[J]. Journal of Statistical Mechanics:Theory and Experiment,2008(10):P10008.
    [35] Fang J,Deng Y C,Che R X,et al. Bacterial community composition in soils covered by different vegetation types in the Yancheng tidal marsh[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2020,27(17):21517-21532.
    [36] Schneider C M,Moreira A A,Andrade J S,et al. Mitigation of malicious attacks on networks[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2011,108(10):3838-3841.
    [37] Louca S,Parfrey L W,Doebeli M. Decoupling function and taxonomy in the global ocean microbiome[J]. Science,2016,353(6305):1272-1277.
    [38] Newman M E J. Modularity and community structure in networks[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2006,103(23):8577-8582.
    [39] Zhao P Y,Liu J X,Jia T,et al. Assembly mechanisms of soil bacterial communities in subalpine coniferous forests on the Loess Plateau,China[J]. Journal of Microbiology,2019,57(6):461-469.
    [40] Monard C,Gantner S,Bertilsson S,et al. Habitat generalists and specialists in microbial communities across a terrestrial-freshwater gradient[J]. Scientific Reports,2016,6:37719.
    [41] Gong L,Ran Q Y,He G X,et al. A soil quality assessment under different land use types in Keriya river basin,Southern Xinjiang,China[J]. Soil and Tillage Research,2015,146:223-229.
    [42] Liu W J,Zhang J W,Qiu C W,et al. Study on community assembly processes under paddy-upland rotation[J]. Soils,2020,52(4):710-717.[刘文静,张建伟,邱崇文,等. 水旱轮作对土壤微生物群落构建过程的影响机制[J]. 土壤,2020,52(4):710-717.]
    [43] Xian W D,Zhang X T,Li W J. Research status and prospect on bacterial Phylum Chloroflexi[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica,2020,60(9):1801-1820.[鲜文东,张潇橦,李文均. 绿弯菌的研究现状及展望[J]. 微生物学报,2020,60(9):1801-1820.]
    [44] Yuan H Z,Wu H,Ge T D,et al. Effects of long-term fertilization on bacterial and archaeal diversity and community structure within subtropical red paddy soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2015,26(6):1807-1813.[袁红朝,吴昊,葛体达,等. 长期施肥对稻田土壤细菌、古菌多样性和群落结构的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2015,26(6):1807-1813.]
    [45] Zhou J,Zhou L Z,Lao C Y,et al. Effects of short-term different tillage methods on the diversity of bacterial community in rice rhizosphere soils[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture,2020,51(10):2401-2411.[周佳,周灵芝,劳承英,等. 短期不同耕作方式对水稻根际土壤细菌群落结构多样性的影响[J]. 南方农业学报,2020,51(10):2401-2411.]
    [46] Cao Y,Wang T Y,Qin Y J,et al. Nitrogen removal characteristics and diversity of microbial community in ANAMMOX reactor[J]. Environmental Science,2017,38(4):1544-1550.[曹雁,王桐屿,秦玉洁,等. 厌氧氨氧化反应器脱氮性能及细菌群落多样性分析[J]. 环境科学,2017,38(4):1544-1550.]
    [47] Sloan W T,Lunn M,Woodcock S,et al. Quantifying the roles of immigration and chance in shaping prokaryote community structure[J]. Environmental Microbiology,2006,8(4):732-740.
    [48] Fierer N,Jackson R B. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2006,103(3):626-631.
    [49] Lauber C L,Hamady M,Knight R,et al. Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2009,75(15):5111-5120.
    [50] Rousk J,Bååth E,Brookes P C,et al. Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil[J]. The ISME Journal,2010,4(10):1340-1351.
    [51] Tripathi B M,Stegen J C,Kim M,et al. Soil pH mediates the balance between stochastic and deterministic assembly of bacteria[J]. The ISME Journal,2018,12(4):1072-1083.
    [52] Heijden M G A,Wagg C. Soil microbial diversity and agro-ecosystem functioning[J]. Plant and Soil,2013,363(1/2):1-5.
    [53] Obayomi O,Seyoum M M,Ghazaryan L,et al. Soil texture and properties rather than irrigation water type shape the diversity and composition of soil microbial communities[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2021,161:103834.
    [54] Bickel S,Or D. The chosen few-variations in common and rare soil bacteria across biomes[J]. The ISME Journal,2021,15(11):3315-3325.
    [55] Tan W J,Wang J M,Bai W Q,et al. Soil bacterial diversity correlates with precipitation and soil pH in long-term maize cropping systems[J]. Scientific Reports,2020,10:6012.
    [56] Cheng Q. Perspectives in biological nitrogen fixation research[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology,2008,50(7):786-798.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

刘红涛,胡天龙,王慧,张燕辉,郭世伟,谢祖彬.典型水稻土细菌亚类群——泛化种、特化种的群落构建及功能潜力[J].土壤学报,2023,60(2):546-557. DOI:10.11766/trxb202105310284 LIU Hongtao, HU Tianlong, WANG Hui, ZHANG Yanhui, GUO Shiwei, XIE Zubin. Community Assembly and Functional Potential of Habitat Generalists and Specialists in Typical Paddy Soils[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2023,60(2):546-557.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1343
  • 下载次数: 2067
  • HTML阅读次数: 1970
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-31
  • 最后修改日期:2021-10-30
  • 录用日期:2022-01-07
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-01-19
  • 出版日期: 2023-03-28
文章二维码