基于文献数据的PAHs生态安全土壤环境基准研究
作者:
基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFC1809100)、国家自然科学基金项目(42207025)和江苏省科技计划专项(BK20221025)资助


Soil Environmental Criteria of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons for Ecological Security Based on Literature Data
Author:
Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42207025), Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Plan (No. BK20221025) , National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFC1809100)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [42]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    多环芳烃(Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons,PAHs)具有致癌、致畸、致突变等“三致”效应,其造成的土壤污染问题受到世界各国的强烈关注。然而我国基于生态安全的土壤风险筛选值和管控标准仍未确立,致使当前土壤生态安全风险评估仍无据可依。通过系统调研国内外土壤中PAHs的生态毒性研究结果,针对16种优先控制PAHs,筛选获得248组毒性数据(Effect concentration10,EC10和No observed effect concentration,NOEC),并利用物种敏感性分布法推导出不同用地方式下各PAH的生态安全土壤环境基准。不同用地方式下各PAH的生态安全土壤环境基准分别为1.00~10.60 mg·kg-1(自然保护地和农用地)、1.03~25.44 mg·kg-1(公园用地)、1.12~51.00 mg·kg-1(住宅用地)、1.20~68.41 mg·kg-1(商服及工业用地)。该研究结果可为我国土壤生态安全环境质量标准的制定和PAHs污染土壤的生态风险评估提供数据支撑和方法指导。

    Abstract:

    ObjectivePolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) have carcinogenic, teratogenic, and mutagenic effects, and soil PAH pollution has become a world-wide problem. However, ecological soil screening and controlling levels (Eco-SSCLs) for PAHs in China have not yet been established. Thus, soil ecological security risk assessment is still unsubstantiated.MethodHere, we systematically investigated the research outcomes in related fields at home and aboard, and screened out 248 toxicity data (Effect concentration10, EC10 and No observed effect concentration, NOEC) of 16 pri-control PAHs listed in USEPA. The species sensitivity distributions were developed by a series of cumulative distribution functions, and were successfully used to derive soil environmental criteria of each PAH (PAH-SEC) for ecological security under different land use types.ResultThe PAH-SEC values under different land use types were 1.00-10.60 mg·kg-1 (natural reserve and agricultural land), 1.03-25.44 mg·kg-1 (parkland), 1.12-51.00 mg·kg-1(residential land), 1.20-68.41 mg·kg-1 (commercial service and industrial land).ConclusionThe results can provide data support for the formulation of soil environmental quality standards for ecological security, and offer bases for ecological risk assessment of PAHs polluted soil.

    参考文献
    [1] Fernández S F, Pardo O, Hernández C S, et al. Children's exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the Valencian Region(Spain): Urinary levels, predictors of exposure and risk assessment[J]. Environment International, 2021, 153: 106535.
    [2] Chen Z G, Tian Z X, Liu X H, et al. The potential risks and exposure of Qinling giant pandas to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon(PAH) pollution[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2022, 292: 118294.
    [3] Ma L, Li Y H, Yao L, et al. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil-turfgrass systems in urban Shanghai: Contamination profiles, in situ bioconcentration and potential health risks[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 289: 125833.
    [4] Schoeny R, Poirier K. Provisional guidance for quantitative risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons[R]. Washington: EPA, 1993.
    [5] Zhao X L, Zhao T H, Li H X, et al. Investigation on important directions of China environmental quality criteria[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2015, 10(1): 18—30. 赵晓丽, 赵天慧, 李会仙, 等. 中国环境基准研究重点方向探讨[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2015, 10(1): 18—30.
    [6] Teng Y, Zhou Q X. Conversion relationships between environmental quality criteria of water/air and soil[J]. Scientia Sinica: Terrae, 2018, 48(11): 1466—1477. 滕涌, 周启星. 土壤环境质量基准与水/大气环境质量基准的转换研究[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2018, 48(11): 1466—1477.
    [7] Zheng L P, Long T, Feng Y H, et al. Environmental quality criteria for lead in soil based on ecological risk[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2016, 32(6): 1030—1035. 郑丽萍, 龙涛, 冯艳红, 等. 基于生态风险的铅(Pb)土壤环境基准研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(6): 1030—1035.
    [8] Zhou Q X. Advances and prospect of research on environmental criteria/benchmarks and enactment of environmental standards[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2010, 26(1): 1—8. 周启星. 环境基准研究与环境标准制定进展及展望[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2010, 26(1): 1—8.
    [9] Xu F L, Li Y L, Wang Y, et al. Key issues for the development and application of the species sensitivity distribution(SSD) model for ecological risk assessment[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 54: 227—237.
    [10] Gredelj A, Barausse A, Grechi L, et al. Deriving predicted no-effect concentrations(PNECs) for emerging contaminants in the River Po, Italy, using three approaches: Assessment factor, species sensitivity distribution and AQUATOX ecosystem modelling[J]. Environment International, 2018, 119: 66—78.
    [11] Van den Brink P J, Buijert-de Gelder D M, Brock T C M, et al. Exposure pattern-specific species sensitivity distributions for the ecological risk assessments of insecticides[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2019, 180: 252—258.
    [12] Staples C A, Woodburn K B, Klecka G M, et al. Comparison of four species sensitivity distribution methods to calculate predicted no effect concentrations for Bisphenol A[J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2008, 14(3): 455—478.
    [13] Sun C, Chen S B, Ma Y B, et al. Ecological hazard concentration(HC5) of cadmium(Cd) to rice cultivars under hydroponic culture as determined with species sensitivity distribution model(Burr-Ⅲ)[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2013, 32(12): 2316—2322. 孙聪, 陈世宝, 马义兵, 等. 基于物种敏感性分布(Burr-Ⅲ)模型预测Cd对水稻毒害的生态风险阈值HC5[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2013, 32(12): 2316—2322.
    [14] Dou W Q, An Y, Qin L, et al. Research progress in determination methods of ecological safety thresholds for heavy metals in agricultural land[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2019, 14(4): 54—64. 窦韦强, 安毅, 秦莉, 等. 农用地土壤重金属生态安全阈值确定方法的研究进展[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2019, 14(4): 54—64.
    [15] Yan S, Zhou Q X, Gao J. Methodology for derivation of water quality criteria for protecting aquatic environment and future development[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2012, 42(23): 2471—2503.
    [16] Dong M M, Mou L Y, Qin L, et al. Evaluation of the goodness of fit of the species sensitivity distribution fitting function[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2021, 40(3): 544—551. 董明明, 牟力言, 秦莉, 等. 物种敏感性分布法拟合函数的拟合优度评价[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2021, 40(3): 544—551.
    [17] General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. Chemicals-Terrestrial plant test-Vegetative vigour test: GB/T 27851—2011[S]. Beijing: General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, 2011. 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 化学品陆生植物生长活力试验: GB/T 27851—2011[S]. 北京: 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 2011.
    [18] General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Test guidelines on environmental safety assessment for chemical pesticides—Part 19: Effects on non-target plants: GB/T 31270.19—2014[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2015. 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 化学农药环境安全评价试验准则第19部分: 非靶标植物影响试验: GB/T 31270.19—2014[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2015.
    [19] General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. Chemicals-Test method of earthworm acute toxicity test: GB/T 21809—2008[S]. Beijing: General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, 2008. 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 化学品蚯蚓急性毒性试验: GB/T 21809—2008[S]. 北京: 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 2008.
    [20] General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Test guidelines on environmental safety assessment for chemical pesticides—Part 15: Earthworm acute toxicity test: GB/T 31270.15—2014[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2015. 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 化学农药环境安全评价试验准则第15部分: 蚯蚓急性毒性试验: GB/T 31270.15—2014[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2015.
    [21] General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. Chemicals-Soils microorganisms-Nitrogen transformation test: GB/T 27854—2011[S]. Beijing: General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, 2011. 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 化学品土壤微生物氮转化试验: GB/T 27854—2011[S]. 北京: 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 2011.
    [22] General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. Chemicals-Soils microorganisms-Carbon transformation test: GB/T 27855—2011[S]. Beijing: General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, 2011. 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 化学品土壤微生物碳转化试验: GB/T 27855—2011[S]. 北京: 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 2011.
    [23] General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Test guidelines on environmental safety assessment for chemical pesticides—Part 16: Soil microorganism toxicity test: GB/T 31270.16—2014[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2014. 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 化学农药环境安全评价试验准则第16部分: 土壤微生物毒性试验: GB/T 31270.16—2014[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014.
    [24] Liu L, Fan S S, Zhang X T, et al. Content and toxicity characteristics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biochars derived from sewage sludge and rice straw[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 29(9): 1874—1882. 刘丽, 范世锁, 张锡涛, 等. 城市污泥和水稻秸秆生物炭中多环芳烃的含量及毒性评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(9): 1874—1882.
    [25] Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China. The official letter for soliciting opinions on three national environmental protection standards, including technical guideline for deriving soil environmental criteria for ecological safety(Draft for opinions)[EB/OL]. (2018-07-25)[2022-08-28]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk06/201808/t20180803_629807.html. 中华人民共和国生态环境部. 关于征求《生态安全土壤环境基准制定技术指南(征求意见稿)》等三项国家保护意见的函[EB/OL]. (2018-07-25)[2022-08-28]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk06/201808/t20180803_629807.html.
    [26] Van der Hoek K W. National institute of public health and environmental protection[R]. Bilthoven: The Netherlands, 1994.
    [27] Brand E, Otte P F, Lijzen J P A, et al. CSOIL 2000 an exposure model for human risk assessment of soil contamination. A model description[R]. Bilthoven: RIVM, 2007.
    [28] US Environmental Protection Agency. Ecological soil screening level guidance(Draft)[R]. Washington: EPA, 2000.
    [29] Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. A protocol for the derivation of environmental and human health soil quality guidelines[R]. Winnipeg: CCME, 2006.
    [30] Fishwick S, Scientist S, Quality S, et al. Soil screening values for use in UK ecological risk assessment[R]. Bristol: EA, 2004.
    [31] Lijzen J P A, Baars A J, Otte P F, et al. Technical evaluation of the intervention values for soil/sediment and groundwater. Human and ecotoxicological risk assessment and derivation of risk limits for soil, aquatic sediment and groundwater[R]. Bilthoven: RIVM, 2001.
    [32] Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China, State Administration for Market Regulation. Soil environmental quality-Risk control standard for soil contamination of agricultural land: GB 15618—2018[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2018. 生态环境部, 国家市场监督管理总局. 土壤环境质量农用地土壤污染风险管控标准: GB 15618—2018[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2018.
    [33] Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China, State Administration for Market Regulation. Soil environmental quality Risk control standard for soil contamination of development land: GB 36600—2018[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2018. 生态环境部, 国家市场监督管理总局. 土壤环境质量建设用地土壤污染风险管控标准: GB 36600—2018[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2018.
    [34] Sun Z J, Zhao S T, Lin X L, et al. Deriving soils environmental criteria of antimony in China by species sensitivity distributions[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2018, 31(4): 774—781. 孙在金, 赵淑婷, 林祥龙, 等. 基于物种敏感度分布法建立中国土壤中锑的环境基准[J]. 环境科学研究, 2018, 31(4): 774— 781.
    [35] Li X Z, Zheng L P, Zhang Y, et al. Derivation of ecological safety based soil quality criteria for lead by species sensitivity distribution[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2021, 16(1): 107—118. 李勖之, 郑丽萍, 张亚, 等. 应用物种敏感分布法建立铅的生态安全土壤环境基准研究[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2021, 16(1): 107—118.
    [36] Lin R H, Jiang H, Wang M, et al. Application of species sensitivity distribution(SSD) to the environmental risk assessment of pesticides[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2017, 12(4): 110—118. 林荣华, 姜辉, 王猛, 等. 物种敏感度分布(SSD)方法在农药环境风险评估中的应用[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2017, 12(4): 110—118.
    [37] Wang T F, Zhang W J, Li L Q, et al. Distribution characteristics and risk assessment of antibiotics and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the sediments of desilting demonstration area in Baiyangdian Lake[J]. Environmental Science, 2021, 42(11): 5303—5311. 王同飞, 张伟军, 李立青, 等. 白洋淀清淤示范区沉积物中抗生素和多环芳烃的分布特征与风险评估[J]. 环境科学, 2021, 42(11): 5303—5311.
    [38] Zhang X X, Zhu C D, Wang F, et al. Pollution characteristics and risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in agricultural soils of different land use types in Nanjing suburbs[J]. Environmental Science, 2023, 44(2): 944—953. 张秀秀, 朱昌达, 王飞, 等. 南京城郊不同土地利用类型农业土壤多环芳烃污染特征及风险评价[J]. 环境科学, 2023, 44(2): 944—953.
    [39] Li Y, Liu M, Hou L J, et al. Geographical distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in estuarine sediments over China: Human impacts and source apportionment[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 768: 145279.
    [40] Jiao T T. Preliminary study on dose-effect relationship for fluoranthene's toxicity to plant and soil organisms and TTS soil environmental criteria[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2009. 焦婷婷. 多环芳烃荧蒽对植物和土壤生物毒害的剂量—效应关系及其土壤环境基准初探[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2009.
    [41] Huang J B, Jiang C C, Wen B, et al. Contamination and probabilistic health risk assessment of heavy metals in agricultural soils around a lead-zinc smelter[J]. Environmental Science, 2022, DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202205055. 黄剑波, 姜登登, 温冰, 等. 基于蒙特卡罗模拟的铅锌冶炼厂周边农田土壤重金属健康风险评估[J]. 环境科学, 2022, DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202205055.
    [42] Qin N, He W, Kong X Z, et al. Ecological risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs) in the water from a large Chinese Lake based on multiple indicators[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2013, 24: 599—608.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

邓继宝,项大洲,林伯正,胡小婕,王贺飞,高彦征.基于文献数据的PAHs生态安全土壤环境基准研究[J].土壤学报,2024,61(3):757-769. DOI:10.11766/trxb202211040517 DENG Jibao, XIANG Dazhou, LIN Bozheng, HU Xiaojie, WANG Hefei, GAO Yanzheng. Soil Environmental Criteria of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons for Ecological Security Based on Literature Data[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2024,61(3):757-769.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:287
  • 下载次数: 1676
  • HTML阅读次数: 948
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-04
  • 最后修改日期:2023-01-12
  • 录用日期:2023-03-25
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-04-06
  • 出版日期: 2024-05-15
文章二维码