秸秆与有机无机肥配施对潮土关键微生物及小麦产量的影响
作者:
中图分类号:

S154.36

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(41977102)、中国科学院战略性先导科技专项任务(XDA24020104-2)和中国现代农业产业技术体系项目(CARS-03)共同资助


Effects of Combined Application of Straw and Organic-inorganic Fertilizers on Key Microorganisms and Wheat Yield in Fluvo-aquic Soil
Author:
Fund Project:

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.41977102), the “Strategic Priority Research Program” of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(No.XDA24020104-2)and the Modern Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA, China (No.CARS-03)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [37]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    秸秆与化肥和鸡粪配施改变了土壤微生物群落结构及微生物间的相互作用关系,但这种变化与小麦产量间的关系尚不清楚。依托7年长期定位试验,选取5个施肥处理:不施化肥+秸秆离田(N0S0)、不施化肥+秸秆还田(N0S)、常规施化肥+秸秆离田(NS0)、常规施化肥+秸秆还田(NS)和施化肥+秸秆还田+鸡粪替代20%氮肥(NSM),研究不同施肥方式对细菌-真菌共现网络中微生物组成的影响,以及关键微生物与小麦产量间的相关关系。结果表明,与N0S0处理相比,NS0、NS和NSM处理的小麦籽粒产量分别提升539.20%、611.56%和676.56%,而N0S处理无显著变化。细菌和真菌群落组成均可分成显著不同的3组,分别为N0S0+N0S、NS0以及NS+NSM,即微生物群落组成在是否施用化肥之间显著不同;相同施用化肥情况下,在是否有施用有机物料之间显著不同。将重要性由高到低排序,导致不同处理细菌群落结构变化的主要土壤理化性质是有效磷(AP)、电导率(EC)、微生物生物量氮(MBN)、土壤有机碳(SOC)、易氧化有机碳(ROC)和颗粒有机碳(POC),导致不同处理真菌群落结构变化的主要土壤理化性质是EC、MBN、ROC、POC、AP和SOC。细菌-真菌共现网络中,两个关键模块(模块1和模块4)与小麦产量变化显著相关。NS+NSM处理提升了模块4中与小麦产量正相关的类诺卡氏菌属(Nocardioides)、纤维单胞菌属(Cellulomonas)、Pir4_lineage、金孢子菌属(Chrysosporium)、无茎真菌属(Acaulium)和裂壳菌属(Schizothecium)等有益菌的相对丰度,它们可降解纤维素和木质素、促进养分转化和循环或抑制病原菌生长;并显著降低了模块1中与小麦产量负相关的葡萄穗霉属(Stachybotrys)、无色穗孢属(Achroiostachys)和Fusicolla的相对丰度,它们为不利于土壤健康和作物生长的植物病原真菌。因此,化肥配施秸秆及化肥配施秸秆和鸡粪利于关键有益微生物增加及病原真菌减少,关键微生物的功能和相对丰度对小麦产量具有影响。

    Abstract:

    【Objective】The combined application of crop straw with chemical fertilizers and chicken manure can change soil microbial community structure and the interaction between microorganisms. However, whether there is a correlation between these changes and wheat yield remains unclear.【Method】A 7-year field experiment was used as the research platform, and this included five management strategies: (1) N0S0: no fertilizer or crop straw returning, (2) N0S: crop straw returning, (3) NS0: traditional chemical fertilization, (4) NS: crop straw returning with chemical fertilizer, and (5) NSM: crop straw returning with chemical fertilizer and the nitrogen was substituted 20% by chicken manure. The effects of different management strategies on microbial community composition in bacterial-fungal co-occurrence networks and the correlation between key microorganisms and wheat yield were studied.【Result】The results showed that compared with N0S0 treatment, the grain yield of wheat under NS0, NS and NSM treatments increased by 539.20%, 611.56% and 676.56%, respectively, while there was no significant change under N0S treatment. The bacterial and fungal community compositions were divided into three significantly different groups: N0S0 and N0S, NS0, and NS and NSM, respectively, indicating that the microbial community composition was significantly different with or without chemical fertilizer application. Under both chemical fertilizer applications, there was a significant difference in whether organic materials were applied. Ranked from high to low importance, we found that available phosphorus, electrical conductivity, microbial biomass nitrogen, soil organic carbon, readily oxidizable organic carbon, and particulate organic carbon were the main soil physicochemical properties that caused the changes in bacterial community composition under different treatments. Also, electrical conductivity, microbial biomass nitrogen, readily oxidizable organic carbon, particulate organic carbon, available phosphorus, and soil organic carbon were the main soil physicochemical properties that caused the changes in fungal community composition under different treatments. In the bacterial-fungal co-occurrence network, two key modules (module 1 and module 4) were significantly correlated with wheat yield changes. NS+NSM treatments increased the relative abundance of beneficial microorganisms in module 4, including Nocardioides, Cellulomonas, Pir4_lineage, Chrysosporium,Acaulium, and Schizothecium, which were positively correlated with wheat yield. These beneficial microorganisms could degrade cellulose and lignin, promote nutrient conversion and recycling, or inhibit the growth of the potential pathogen. NS+NSM treatments also significantly reduced the relative abundance of plant pathogenic fungi in module 1, including Stachybotrys,Achroiostachys, and Fusicolla, which were negatively correlated with wheat yield and were detrimental to soil health and crop growth.【Conclusion】Therefore, crop straw returning with chemical fertilizer and crop straw returning with chemical fertilizer and chicken manure were beneficial to the increase of key beneficial microorganisms and the decrease of pathogenic fungi. The function and the relative abundance of key microorganisms had effects on wheat yield.

    参考文献
    [1] Tao Y, Liu T, Wu J Y, et al. Effect of combined application of chicken manure and inorganic nitrogen fertilizer on yield and quality of cherry tomato[J]. Agronomy, 2022, 12(7):1574.
    [2] Yin H J, Zhao W Q, Li T, et al. Balancing straw returning and chemical fertilizers in China:Role of straw nutrient resources[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 81:2695-2702.
    [3] Liu B, Xia H, Jiang C C, et al. 14 year applications of chemical fertilizers and crop straw effects on soil labile organic carbon fractions, enzyme activities and microbial community in rice-wheat rotation of middle China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 841:156608.
    [4] Liu Z P, Xie W Y, Yang Z X, et al. Effects of manure and chemical fertilizer on bacterial community structure and soil enzyme activities in North China[J]. Agronomy, 2021, 11(5):1017.
    [5] Ma T F, He X H, Chen S G, et al. Long-term organic-inorganic fertilization regimes alter bacterial and fungal communities and rice yields in paddy soil[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2022, 13:890712.
    [6] Cong P, Wang J, Li Y Y, et al. Changes in soil organic carbon and microbial community under varying straw incorporation strategies[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2020, 204:104735.
    [7] Zhang Z M, Yan J, Han X Z, et al. Labile organic carbon fractions drive soil microbial communities after long-term fertilization[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2021, 32:e01867.
    [8] Das P P, Singh K R, Nagpure G, et al. Plant-soil- microbes:A tripartite interaction for nutrient acquisition and better plant growth for sustainable agricultural practices[J]. Environmental Research, 2022, 214:113821.
    [9] Fan K K, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Guo X S, et al. Biodiversity of key-stone phylotypes determines crop production in a 4-decade fertilization experiment[J]. The ISME Journal, 2021, 15(2):550-561.
    [10] Jin H Y, Zhang D Q, Yan Y Q, et al. Short-term application of chicken manure under different nitrogen rates alters structure and co-occurrence pattern but not diversity of soil microbial community in wheat field[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2022, 13:975571.
    [11] Zhou T T, Li D D, Qiu L L, et al. Coupling effects of straw and woody peat on rapidly increasing soil organic matter and crop yield under different application ratios[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2023, DOI:10.11766/trxb20211 2030656.[周谈坛, 李丹丹, 邱丽丽, 等.不同配施比例下秸秆和木本泥炭对快速提升土壤有机质和作物产量的耦合影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2023, DOI:10.11766/trxb 202112030656.]
    [12] Qiu L L, Li D D, Zhang J B, et al. Effects of key-stone microbe based on Co-occurrence networks on wheat yield in the soils with straw returning[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2023, 60(2):491-502. [邱丽丽, 李丹丹, 张佳宝, 等. 基于共现网络的关键微生物对秸秆还田土壤小麦产量的影响[J].土壤学报, 2023, 60(2):491-502.]
    [13] Lu R K. Analytical methods for soil and agro- chemistry[M]. Beijing:China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2000. [鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社, 2000.]
    [14] Lefroy R D B, Blair G J, Strong W M. Changes in soil organic matter with cropping as measured by organic carbon fractions and13C natural isotope abundance[J]. Plant and Soil, 1993, 155(1):399-402.
    [15] Cambardella C A, Elliott E T. Particulate soil organic- matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1992, 56(3):777-783.
    [16] Ren G D, Zhang M, Zhang W Y, et al. Effects of organic materials from different sources on growth and quality of vegetable broad beans and properties of rhizosphere soil[J]. Soils, 2022, 54(4):740-749. [任改弟, 张苗, 张文越, 等. 不同来源有机物料对菜用蚕豆生长和品质及根际土壤性状的影响[J].土壤, 2022, 54(4):740-749.]
    [17] Han Y L, Ma W, Zhou B Y, et al. Effects of straw-return method for the maize-rice rotation system on soil properties and crop yields[J]. Agronomy, 2020, 10(4):461.
    [18] Wang X Y, Duan Y, Zhang J, et al. Response of potato yield, soil chemical and microbial properties to different rotation sequences of green manure-potato cropping in North China[J]. Soil& Tillage Research, 2022, 217:105273.
    [19] Liu X Y, Shi Y, Kong L Y, et al. Long-term application of bio-compost increased soil microbial community diversity and altered its composition and network[J]. Microorganisms, 2022, 10(2):462.
    [20] Chernov T I, Semenov M V. Management of soil microbial communities:Opportunities and prospects(a review)[J]. Eurasian Soil Science, 2021, 54(12):1888-1902.
    [21] Liu H Y, Xu W, Li J Y, et al. Short-term effect of manure and straw application on bacterial and fungal community compositions and abundances in an acidic paddy soil[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2021, 21(9):3057-3071.
    [22] Sabir M S, Shahzadi F, Ali F, et al. Comparative effect of fertilization practices on soil microbial diversity and activity:An overview[J]. Current Microbiology, 2021, 78(10):3644-3655.
    [23] Zhao Y, Zhou F, Luo J L, et al. Effects of rice straw returning combined with fertilizer application on yield and nitrogen utilization of wheat[J]. Soils, 2021, 53(5):937-944. [赵颖, 周枫, 罗佳琳, 等. 水稻秸秆还田配施肥料对小麦产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 土壤, 2021, 53(5):937-944.]
    [24] Guo Z B, Wan S X, Hua K K, et al. Fertilization regime has a greater effect on soil microbial community structure than crop rotation and growth stage in an agroecosystem[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2020, 149:103510.
    [25] Abdulla H M, El-Shatoury S A. Actinomycetes in rice straw decomposition[J]. Waste Management, 2007, 27(6):850-853.
    [26] Fang H, Lian J J, Wang H F, et al. Exploring bacterial community structure and function associated with atrazine biodegradation in repeatedly treated soils[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 286:457-465.
    [27] Gu Y F, Wang Y Y, Lu S E, et al. Long-term fertilization structures bacterial and archaeal communities along soil depth gradient in a paddy soil[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2017, 8:1516.
    [28] Liu Z Y. Effects of Trichoderma bio-organic fertilizer application on yield and soil microflora in Chinese- cabbage and wild-cabbage rotation system[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Agricultural University, 2020. [刘正洋. 木霉生物有机肥对白菜-甘蓝轮作体系作物产量及土壤微生物区系的影响[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2020.]
    [29] Khatami S, Deng Y, Tien M, et al. Lignin contribution to aliphatic constituents of humic acids through fungal degradation[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2019, 48(6):1565-1570.
    [30] Shang C, Chen A W, Cao R Y, et al. Response of microbial community to the remediation of neonicotinoid insecticide imidacloprid contaminated wetland soil by Phanerochaete chrysosporium[J]. Chemosphere, 2023, 311:136975.
    [31] He Y, Liu D, He X H, et al. Characteristics of bacterial and fungal communities and their impact during cow manure and agroforestry biowaste co-composting[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 324:116377.
    [32] Zhang X M, Li J L, Liang B. Soil fungal community structure changes in response to different long-term fertilization treatments in a greenhouse tomato monocropping system[J]. Phyton-International Journal of Experimental Botany, 2021, 90(4):1233-1246.
    [33] Zhang J L, Liu Q W, Li K, et al. Peanut root exudates suppress Fusarium solani and modulate the microbial community structure of rhizosphere in grape replant soil[J]. Horticulturae, 2022, 8(10):892.
    [34] Ma L, Li Y, Wei J L, et al. Effects of long-term straw returning on fungal community, enzyme activity and wheat yield in fluvo-aquic soil[J]. Environmental Science, 2022, 43(10):4755-4764.[马垒, 李燕, 魏建林, 等. 长期秸秆还田对潮土真菌群落、酶活性和小麦产量的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(10):4755-4764.]
    [35] Zhai F H, Li T L, Qin X R, et al. Effect of fertilisation on fungal community in topsoil of winter wheat field[J]. Plant, Soil and Environment, 2022, 68(7):317-327.
    [36] Srour A Y, Gibson D J, Leandro L F S, et al. Unraveling microbial and edaphic factors affecting the development of sudden death syndrome in soybean[J]. Phytobiomes Journal, 2017, 1(2):91-101.
    [37] Chen J, Guo Q K, Liu D H, et al. Composition, predicted functions, and co-occurrence networks of fungal and bacterial communities_ Links to soil organic carbon under long-term fertilization in a rice-wheat cropping system[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2020, 100:103226.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

郭伟,周云鹏,陈美淇,李丹丹,王青霞,周谈坛,赵炳梓.秸秆与有机无机肥配施对潮土关键微生物及小麦产量的影响[J].土壤学报,2024,61(4):1134-1146. DOI:10.11766/trxb202303010086 GUO Wei, ZHOU Yunpeng, CHEN Meiqi, LI Dandan, WANG Qingxia, ZHOU Tantan, ZHAO Bingzi. Effects of Combined Application of Straw and Organic-inorganic Fertilizers on Key Microorganisms and Wheat Yield in Fluvo-aquic Soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2024,61(4):1134-1146.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:335
  • 下载次数: 1375
  • HTML阅读次数: 665
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-01
  • 最后修改日期:2023-07-14
  • 录用日期:2023-10-09
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-10-20
  • 出版日期: 2024-07-15
文章二维码