狗牙根根系生长动态特征及其对土壤孔隙演变的影响
作者:
中图分类号:

S152.5

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(42377320,41771266)、三峡后续工作规划项目(5000002021BF40001)、中国科学院西部青年学者项目(202082)和重庆市自然科学基金(cstc2021jcyj-msxmX1099)资助


Dynamic Characteristics of Cynodon dactylon Root Growth and Its Influence on Soil Pore Evolution
Author:
Fund Project:

the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42377320,41771266), the Three Gorges

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [57]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    狗牙根(Cynodon dactylon)是生态绿化、固土护坡、植被重建和水土保持的常用草本植物,其发达的根系网络和独特的生长特性对于土壤孔隙的形成和空间重组具有重要影响。然而,目前相关研究多聚焦于其根系对土壤团聚体形成和稳定的作用,根系生长过程对土壤孔隙的动态影响尚不清楚。本研究采用盆栽试验,选取狗牙根为模式植物,西南山地丘陵区典型紫色土和黄壤为培养基质,设置紫色土单种(G)、紫色土空白(CK)、黄壤单种(YG)和黄壤空白(YCK)4种不同处理。利用微根窗技术连续采集不同处理下的土壤剖面图像,通过优化的根系提取算法和图像处理技术量化不同时期的狗牙根根系性状和土壤孔隙结构参数,结合统计分析,探究狗牙根根系生长动态及其对土壤孔隙结构演变的影响。结果表明:(1)狗牙根在紫色土和黄壤中均呈生长状态,其根系生长速率在不同土壤类型间表现为:紫色土>黄壤,紫色土狗牙根的根长、根表面积和根体积分别是黄壤培养条件下的近3倍;(2)与未种植植物的CK和YCK相比,狗牙根的生长显著降低了紫色土和黄壤的孔隙数目、孔隙度和孔隙分形维数,并且根系对土壤孔隙的降低作用随根系生长不断增强;(3)冗余分析表明,根系累计解释了40.60% 的土壤孔隙结构变异,根长、根表面积和根体积是降低土壤孔隙结构参数的关键根系性状。综上所述,通过优化的微根窗技术实现了植物根系和土壤孔隙的定点连续观测,发现狗牙根在生长期间显著降低了孔隙数目等参数,这为根-孔交互作用的原位、无损、动态研究提供了方法学支撑,也为生态脆弱区植被恢复和水土保持提供了理论依据。

    Abstract:

    【Objective】 Cynodon dactylon is a commonly used herbaceous plant for ecological greening, soil consolidation and slope protection, vegetation restoration, and soil and water conservation. Its developed root system network and unique growth characteristics have a significant impact on the formation and spatial reorganization of soil pores. Current research has mostly focused on the role of the plant’s roots in soil aggregate formation and stability, however, the dynamic impact of root growth on soil pores remains unclear. 【Method】 This study employed a pot experiment, selecting Cynodon dactylon as the model plant and typical purple soil and yellow soil from the mountainous and hilly regions of southwestern China as the culture substrates. Four different treatments were established: purple soil with Cynodon dactylon (G), purple soil control (CK), yellow soil with Cynodon dactylon (YG), and yellow soil control (YCK). The soil profile images under different treatments were continuously collected using the minirhizotron technique. The root traits of Cynodon dactylon and soil pore structure parameters at different stages were quantified through optimized root extraction algorithms and image processing techniques. Combined with statistical analysis, the study explored the dynamic growth of Cynodon dactylon roots and their impacts on the evolution of soil pore structure. 【Result】 The results showed that: (1) Cynodon dactylon grew well in both purple and yellow soils, and the root growth rate was higher in purple soil than in yellow soil. The root length, root surface area, and root volume of Cynodon dactylon in purple soil were nearly three times higher than those under yellow soil cultivation conditions; (2) Compared with the unplanted CK and YCK, the growth of Cynodon dactylon significantly reduced the number of pores, porosity, and fractal dimension of purple and yellow soils, and the reduction effect of roots on soil pores continuously increased with root growth; (3) Redundancy analysis indicated that roots explained 40.60% of the variation in soil pore structure, and root length, root surface area, and root volume were the key root traits that reduced soil pore structure parameters. 【Conclusion】 In summary, through the optimized minirhizotron technique, continuous observation of plant roots and soil pores was achieved on site. It was found that Cynodon dactylon significantly reduced pore number and other parameters during its growth period, providing methodological support for in-situ, non-destructive, and dynamic studies on root-pore interactions, as well as theoretical support for vegetation restoration and soil and water conservation in ecologically fragile areas.

    参考文献
    [1] Gregory P J. RUSSELL REVIEW Are plant roots only "in" soil or are they "of" it? Roots, soil formation and function[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 73(1): e13219.
    [2] Lucas M, Nguyen L T T, Guber A, et al. Cover crop influence on pore size distribution and biopore dynamics:Enumerating root and soil faunal effects[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, 13:928569.
    [3] Lu J R, Zhang Q, Werner A D, et al. Root-induced changes of soil hydraulic properties-A review[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 589:125203.
    [4] Wang Y B, Zhang L, Yao J, et al. Accumulation and resistance to copper of two biotypes of Cynodon dactylon[J]. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2009, 82(4): 454-459.
    [5] Zhang Y Y, Wang X F, Wang Y H, et al. Ecological stoichiometry and interrelation of Cynodon dactylon and soil in the Three Gorges hydro-fluctuation zone under different slopes[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(11): 4798-4811.[张媛媛, 王晓锋, 王轶浩, 等. 三峡消落带不同坡度狗牙根及实生土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(11): 4798-4811.]
    [6] Singh K, Pandey V C, Singh R P. Cynodon dactylon:An efficient perennial grass to revegetate sodic lands[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2013, 54:32-38.
    [7] Yang Y H, Wu J C, Mao Y P, et al. Effect of no-tillage on pore distribution in soil profile[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2018, 26(7): 1019-1028.[杨永辉, 武继承, 毛永萍, 等. 免耕对土壤剖面孔隙分布特征的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(7): 1019-1028.]
    [8] Lucas M, Schlüter S, Vogel H J, et al. Soil structure formation along an agricultural chronosequence[J]. Geoderma, 2019, 350:61-72.
    [9] Pagliai M, Vignozzi N. The soil pore system as an indicator of soil quality[J]. Advances in Geo-ecology, 2002, 37:71-82.
    [10] Dexter A R. Compression of soil around roots[J]. Plant and Soil, 1987, 97(3): 401-406.
    [11] Pires L F, Auler A C, Roque W L, et al. X-ray microtomography analysis of soil pore structure dynamics under wetting and drying cycles[J]. Geoderma, 2020, 362:114103.
    [12] de Oliveira J A T, Cássaro F A M, Pires L F. Quantification of the pore size distribution of a Rhodic Hapludox under different management systems with X-ray microtomography and computational simulation[J]. Soil &Tillage Research, 2021, 209:104941.
    [13] Zhou H, Whalley W R, Hawkesford M J, et al. The interaction between wheat roots and soil pores in structured field soil[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2021, 72(2): 747-756.
    [14] Liedgens M, Richner W. Minirhizotron observations of the spatial distribution of the maize root system[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2001, 93(5): 1097-1104.
    [15] Chen J, Liu L T, Wang Z B, et al. Determining the effects of nitrogen rate on cotton root growth and distribution with soil cores and minirhizotrons[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(5): e0197284.
    [16] Carter, Luke. Soybean root growth and yield response to variable rate irrigation[D]. Alabama:Auburn University, 2018.
    [17] Uddin S, Löw M, Parvin S, et al. Water use and growth responses of dryland wheat grown under elevated[CO2]are associated with root length in deeper, but not upper soil layer[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, 224:170-181.
    [18] Balogianni V G, Wilson S D, Farrell R E, et al. Rapid root decomposition decouples root length from increased soil C following grassland invasion[J]. Ecosystems, 2015, 18(8): 1307-1318.
    [19] Arnone III J A, Zaller J G. Earthworm effects on native grassland root system dynamics under natural and increased rainfall[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2014, 5:152.
    [20] Tierney G L, Fahey T J. Fine root turnover in a northern hardwood forest:A direct comparison of the radiocarbon and minirhizotron methods[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2002, 32(9): 1692-1697.
    [21] Tierney G L, Fahey T J. Evaluating minirhizotron estimates of fine root longevity and production in the forest floor of a temperate broadleaf forest[J]. Plant and Soil, 2001, 229(2): 167-176.
    [22] Chen W L, Chen F F, Lai S X, et al. Spatial distribution and dynamics of cotton fine root under film-mulched drip irrigation[J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2022, 179:114693.
    [23] Wahlström E M, Kristensen H L, Thomsen I K, et al. Subsoil compaction effect on spatio-temporal root growth, reuse of biopores and crop yield of spring barley[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2021, 123:126225.
    [24] Ma T, Zeng W Z, Lei G Q, et al. Predicting the rooting depth, dynamic root distribution and the yield of sunflower under different soil salinity and nitrogen applications[J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2021, 170:113749.
    [25] Yi Y L. Research method of soil physics[M]. Beijing:Peking University Press, 2009.[依艳丽. 土壤物理研究法[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2009.]
    [26] Lu R K. Analytical methods for soil and agro-chemistry[M]. Beijing:China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2000.[鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社, 2000.]
    [27] Dhaliwal J K, Kumar S. 3D-visualization and quantification of soil porous structure using X-ray micro-tomography scanning under native pasture and crop-livestock systems[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2022, 218:105305.
    [28] Li Y L, Wang C K, Lu B L, et al. In-situ monitoring method of wheat root growth under salt stress using minirhizotron technique[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2021, 58(3): 599-609.[李燕丽, 王昌昆, 卢碧林, 等. 基于微根管技术的盐胁迫下小麦根系生长原位监测方法[J]. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(3): 599-609.]
    [29] Zhao Y, Han Q L, Zhao Y D. Optimization of soil pore quantitative expression based on computed tomography scanning technology[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2017, 48(10): 252-259.[赵玥, 韩巧玲, 赵燕东. 基于CT扫描技术的土壤孔隙定量表达优化[J]. 农业机械学报, 2017, 48(10): 252-259.]
    [30] Wang S F, Lü L, Xue K X, et al. Micropore structure and fractal characteristics of clays due to freeze-thaw and compression based on mercury intrusion porosimetry[J]. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2022, 10:851673.
    [31] Guo Y F, Fan R Q, Zhang X P, et al. Tillage-induced effects on SOC through changes in aggregate stability and soil pore structure[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 703:134617.
    [32] Sun X Q, She D L, Fei Y H, et al. Three-dimensional fractal characteristics of soil pore structure and their relationships with hydraulic parameters in biochar-amended saline soil[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2021, 205:104809.
    [33] Xiong P, Zhang Z B, Wang Y K, et al. Variable responses of maize roots at the seedling stage to artificial biopores in noncompacted and compacted soil[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2022, 22(4): 1155-1164.
    [34] Kuka K, Illerhaus B, Fox C A, et al. X-ray computed microtomography for the study of the soil-root relationship in grassland soils[J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 2013, 12(4): 1-10.
    [35] Wu J G. Progress of the researches on functions of soil particles[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2008, 30(4): 529-537.[吴景贵. 土壤颗粒的功能研究进展[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2008, 30(4): 529-537.]
    [36] Jackson R B, Canadell J, Ehleringer J R, et al. A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes[J]. Oecologia, 1996, 108(3): 389-411.
    [37] Ran C, Gao D P, Liu W Y, et al. Straw and nitrogen amendments improve soil, rice yield, and roots in a saline sodic soil[J]. Rhizosphere, 2022, 24:100606.
    [38] Dodd M B, MacKay A D. Effects of contrasting soil fertility on root mass, root growth, root decomposition and soil carbon under a New Zealand perennial ryegrass/white clover pasture[J]. Plant and Soil, 2011, 349(1): 291-302.
    [39] Vogt K A, Vogt D J, Palmiotto P A, et al. Review of root dynamics in forest ecosystems grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species[J]. Plant and Soil, 1995, 187(2): 159-219.
    [40] Dwyer J M, Hobbs R J, Mayfield M M. Specific leaf area responses to environmental gradients through space and time[J]. Ecology, 2014, 95(2): 399-410.
    [41] Zhang L M, Tan X, Dong Z, et al. The relationship between plant functional traits and soil physicochemical properties in the riparian zones of downtown Chongqing[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(5): 1892-1901.[张丽苗, 谭雪, 董智, 等. 重庆主城河岸带植物群落功能性状与土壤理化性质的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(5): 1892-1901.]
    [42] Xing Q, Qin J, Hu Y H. Research on the architectural characteristics and growth dynamics of two plants root in vertical greenery systems[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(6): 2515-2523.[邢强, 秦俊, 胡永红. 城市垂直绿墙常用植物的根系构型特征和生长动态[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(6): 2515-2523.]
    [43] Scholl P, Leitner D, Kammerer G, et al. Root induced changes of effective 1D hydraulic properties in a soil column[J]. Plant and Soil, 2014, 381(1/2): 193-213.
    [44] Wendel A S, Bauke S L, Amelung W, et al. Root- rhizosphere-soil interactions in biopores[J]. Plant & Soil, 2022, 475(1): 253-277.
    [45] Zheng Y, Chen N, Yu K L, et al. The effects of fine roots and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on soil macropores[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2023, 225:105528.
    [46] Hudek C, Putinica C, Otten W, et al. Functional root trait-based classification of cover crops to improve soil physical properties[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 73(1): e13147.
    [47] Poirier V, Roumet C, Munson A D. The root of the matter:Linking root traits and soil organic matter stabilization processes[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 120:246-259.
    [48] He N N, Jia R H, Ye M T, et al. Effect of rape intercropping on soil macropore structure in dryland apple orchard of the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(1): 259-264.[何娜娜, 贾如浩, 叶苗泰, 等. 黄土高原旱地苹果园油菜间作对土壤大孔隙结构的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(1): 259-264.]
    [49] Budhathoki S, Lamba J, Srivastava P, et al. Temporal and spatial variability in 3D soil macropore characteristics determined using X-ray computed tomography[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2022, 22(4): 1263-1277.
    [50] Bruand A, Cousin I, Nicoullaud B, et al. Backscattered electron scanning images of soil porosity for analyzing soil compaction around roots[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1996, 60(3): 895-901.
    [51] Helliwell J R, Sturrock C J, Mairhofer S, et al. The emergent rhizosphere:Imaging the development of the porous architecture at the root-soil interface[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1): 14875.
    [52] Stolze K, Barnes A D, Eisenhauer N, et al. Depth- differentiated, multivariate control of biopore number under different land-use practices[J]. Geoderma, 2022, 418:115852.
    [53] Han E, Kautz T, Perkons U, et al. Root growth dynamics inside and outside of soil biopores as affected by crop sequence determined with the profile wall method[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2015, 51(7): 847-856.
    [54] Colloff M J, Pullen K R, Cunningham S A. Restoration of an ecosystem function to revegetation communities:The role of invertebrate macropores in enhancing soil water infiltration[J]. Restoration Ecology, 2010, 18(s1): 65-72.
    [55] Mele G, Buscemi G, Gargiulo L, et al. Soil burrow characterization by 3D image analysis:Prediction of macroinvertebrate groups from biopore size distribution parameters[J]. Geoderma, 2021, 404:115292.
    [56] Klaminder J, Krab E J, Larsbo M, et al. Holes in the tundra:Invasive earthworms alter soil structure and moisture in tundra soils[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 859:160125.
    [57] Hallam J, Holden J, Robinson D A, et al. Effects of winter wheat and endogeic earthworms on soil physical and hydraulic properties[J]. Geoderma, 2021, 400:115126.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

张靖,冉义国,马东豪,陈琳,吴英博,黄平.狗牙根根系生长动态特征及其对土壤孔隙演变的影响[J].土壤学报,2025,62(1):54-68. DOI:10.11766/trxb202310310446 ZHANG Jing, RAN Yiguo, MA Donghao, CHEN Lin, WU Yingbo, HUANG Ping. Dynamic Characteristics of Cynodon dactylon Root Growth and Its Influence on Soil Pore Evolution[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2025,62(1):54-68.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:580
  • 下载次数: 898
  • HTML阅读次数: 439
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-23
  • 最后修改日期:2024-04-29
  • 录用日期:2024-07-04
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-07-18
文章二维码