天然腐殖质改性材料的特性及其在滴灌方式下对玉米的促生作用
作者:
基金项目:

北大荒黑土地生态环境保护综合实验室一期项目,北大荒黑土地土壤有机质提升技术研究集成与应用项目(2023年)(BDHYJY-YJ-02-I-2023-1211048)、安徽省重点研发计划项目(2023n06020056)、国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFD1500502)共同资助


Characteristics of Natural Humus Modified Materials and Their Growth- promoting Effects on Maize Under Drip Irrigation
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [39]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    探讨了通过不同加工方法获得的两种天然腐殖质改性材料在滴灌条件下对玉米生长的影响。首先,通过元素分析、扫描电镜和傅里叶变换红外光谱等手段分析了天然腐殖质材料砂磨液(M1)和全水溶硝基腐殖酸钾(M2)的物理和化学特性,然后在田间试验中,通过滴灌施用不同浓度(0.2、0.4、0.6、0.8、1.0、1.5、2.0 g·L–1)和用量(650、1 300、1 950 L·hm–2)的两种材料,研究了玉米植株的株高、生物量和产量的变化趋势。结果表明:1)M1和M2在化学组成和微观结构方面有显著区别。M1的分子量较高,结构复杂;M2的分子量较低,但腐殖质活性组分含量更高。2)尽管施用M1和M2对玉米株高的影响不明显,但却显著提升了玉米的生物量和产量。特别是M2,当其浓度为1.0 g·L–1、用量为1 300或1 950 L·hm–2时,玉米植株的生物量较CK分别显著增加40.11%、40.74%,产量较CK分别显著增加25.75%、27.45%。总体而言,滴灌施用M1和M2两种材料均能有效促进玉米生长,其中M2在相同条件下表现出更大的生长潜力。综合成本等因素,建议在田间施用M2,浓度为1.0 g·L–1、用量为1 300 L·hm–2的组合。本研究为农业生产提供了新的视角和实践依据。

    Abstract:

    【Objective】 This study aims to analyze the physicochemical properties of two natural humus-modified materials (M1 and M2) produced by different processing methods, compare the differences between the two materials, and investigate their effects at different concentrations on the growth of maize under drip irrigation conditions. The goal is to explore the most suitable application concentration and amount of humus under drip irrigation and provide new perspectives and practical bases for agricultural production. 【Method】 The content of humus and its components in M1 (natural humus sand grinding fluid) and M2 (fully water-soluble potassium nitrohumate) was determined and the physical and chemical properties of the materials were analyzed through elemental analysis, scanning electron microscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Then, field experiments were designed to evaluate the effects of applying different concentrations (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 g·L–1) and amounts (650, 1 300, 1 950 L·hm–2) of M1 and M2 on the height, biomass, and yield of maize. 【Result】 The results showed that: 1) There were significant differences in chemical composition between M1 and M2. M1 had a higher content of humus, larger molecular weight, more complex structure, and stronger stability in soil. On the other hand, M2 had a lower total content of humus, a high content of fulvic acid (FA), a smaller molecular weight, and a lower degree of humification. 2) The microstructure of M1 and M2 differed. M1 had a rough and complex particle surface with uneven particle size while M2 exhibited a smoother and looser sponge-like appearance with no chaotic structure on the particle surface. FTIR analysis showed that M1 may contain more aromatic structures or carboxylate salts and silicate impurities while M2 may contain more carboxyl groups. 3) Although the application of M1 and M2 had little effect on plant height, it significantly increased the biomass and yield of maize. Especially for M2, when its concentration was 1.0 g·L–1 and the amount was 1 300 or 1 950 L·hm–2, the biomass of maize plants increased significantly by 40.11% and 40.74% and the yield increased significantly by 25.75% and 27.45%, respectively. 【Conclusion】 The application of different concentrations and amounts of M1 and M2 effectively promoted the growth of maize, with M2 exhibiting greater growth potential under the same conditions. This may be attributed to the role of humus in improving soil structure, increasing and retaining soil moisture and nutrient content, activating specific biochemical pathways, and enhancing soil microbial activity, thereby improving the nutrient absorption efficiency and photosynthetic capacity of maize plants. Considering factors such as cost, it is recommended to apply M2 at a concentration of 1.0 g·L–1 and an amount of 1 300 L·hm–2 in the field to fully exploit its effects in promoting maize growth potential and increasing yield. This provides new perspectives and practical bases for the efficient utilization of humus in agriculture.

    参考文献
    [1] Shen J B,Bai Y,Wei Z,et al. Rhizobiont:An interdisciplinary innovation and perspective for harmonizing resources,environment,and food security[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2021,58(4):805-813. [申建波,白洋,韦中,等. 根际生命共同体:协调资源、环境和粮食安全的学术思路与交叉创新[J]. 土壤学报,2021,58(4):805-813.]
    [2] Coskun D,Britto D T,Shi W M,et al. Nitrogen transformations in modern agriculture and the role of biological nitrification inhibition[J]. Nature Plants,2017,3(6):17074.
    [3] Jarukas L,Ivanauskas L,Kasparaviciene G,et al. Determination of organic compounds,fulvic acid,humic acid,and humin in peat and sapropel alkaline extracts[J]. Molecules,2021,26(10):2995.
    [4] Luo W Q,Zhao X,Wang G T,et al. Humic acid and fulvic acid facilitate the formation of vivianite and the transformation of cadmium via microbially-mediated iron reduction[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2023,446:130655.
    [5] Sun H Y,Sun Y Z,Zhou L,et al. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with humic acid bio-fertilizer on soil biological properties and dry matter mass of maize[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2022,33(3):677-684. [孙海燕,孙义卓,周娈,等. 化肥减量配施腐植酸生物肥对土壤生物学性质和玉米干物质量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2022,33(3):677-684.]
    [6] Liang Y Y,Wang Z P,Shi Q Z,et al. Effects of fulvic acid with different molecular weights on growth and nutrient utilization of winter wheat[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers,2023,29(2):308-322. [梁媛媛,王泽平,史秋哲,等. 不同分子量黄腐酸对冬小麦生长和养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2023,29(2):308-322.]
    [7] Kishor M,Jayakumar M,Gokavi N,et al. Humic acid as foliar and soil application improve the growth,yield and quality of coffee(cv. C×R)in Western Ghats of India[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2021,101(6):2273-2283.
    [8] Rasouli F,Nasiri Y,Asadi M,et al. Fertilizer type and humic acid improve the growth responses,nutrient uptake,and essential oil content on Coriandrum sativum L[J]. Scientific Reports,2022,12(1):7437.
    [9] Tyagi J,Ahmad S,Malik M. Nitrogenous fertilizers:Impact on environment sustainability,mitigation strategies,and challenges[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology,2022,19(11):11649-11672.
    [10] Yang M H,Zhang L,Xu S T,et al. Effect of water soluble humic acid applied to potato foliage on plant growth,photosynthesis characteristics and fresh tuber yield under different water deficits[J]. Scientific Reports,2020,10(1):7854.
    [11] Selim E M,Mosa A A,El-Ghamry A M. Evaluation of humic substances fertigation through surface and subsurface drip irrigation systems on potato grown under Egyptian sandy soil conditions[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2009,96(8):1218-1222.
    [12] Lu R K. Analytical methods for soil and agro- chemistry[M]. Beijing:China Agricultural Science and Technology Press,2000. [鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000.]
    [13] Xu J S,Zhao B Z,Chu W Y,et al. Chemical nature of humic substances in two typical Chinese soils(upland vs paddy soil):A comparative advanced solid state NMR study[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2017,576:444-452.
    [14] Jones D L,Willett V B. Experimental evaluation of methods to quantify dissolved organic nitrogen(DON)and dissolved organic carbon(DOC)in soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2006,38(5):991-999.
    [15] Liu X M,Hou Y,Li Z,et al. Hyperthermophilic composting of sewage sludge accelerates humic acid formation:Elemental and spectroscopic evidence[J]. Waste Management,2020,103:342-351.
    [16] Coelho R D,de Almeida A N,de Oliveira Costa J,et al. Mobile drip irrigation(MDI):Clogging of high flow emitters caused by dragging of driplines on the ground and by solid particles in the irrigation water[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2022,263:107454.
    [17] Rashid T,Sher F,Jusoh M,et al. Parametric optimization and structural feature analysis of humic acid extraction from lignite[J]. Environmental Research,2023,220:115160.
    [18] Shen Y W,Lin H T,Gao W S,et al. The effects of humic acid urea and polyaspartic acid urea on reducing nitrogen loss compared with urea[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2020,100(12):4425-4432.
    [19] Luo H W,Liu C Y,He D Q,et al. Interactions between polypropylene microplastics(PP-MPs)and humic acid influenced by aging of MPs[J]. Water Research,2022,222:118921.
    [20] Li H H,Zhang T,Tsang D C W,et al. Effects of external additives:Biochar,bentonite,phosphate,on co-composting for swine manure and corn straw[J]. Chemosphere,2020,248:125927.
    [21] Pucić I,Jurkin T. FTIR assessment of poly(ethylene oxide)irradiated in solid state,melt and aqeuous solution[J]. Radiation Physics and Chemistry,2012,81(9):1426-1429.
    [22] Guo X J,Li C W,Zhu Q L,et al. Characterization of dissolved organic matter from biogas residue composting using spectroscopic techniques[J]. Waste Management,2018,78:301-309.
    [23] Ampong K,Thilakaranthna M S,Gorim L Y. Understanding the role of humic acids on crop performance and soil health[J]. Frontiers in Agronomy,2022,4:848621.
    [24] Song G X,Simpson A J,Hayes M H B. Compositional changes in the humin fraction resulting from the long-term cultivation of an Irish grassland soil:Evidence from FTIR and multi-NMR spectroscopies[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2023,880:163280.
    [25] Zheng Y Y,Zhang J B,Tan J,et al. Chemical composition and structure of humus relative to sources[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2019,56(2):386-397. [郑延云,张佳宝,谭钧,等. 不同来源腐殖质的化学组成与结构特征研究[J]. 土壤学报,2019,56(2):386-397.]
    [26] Dai S X,Zhao L,Teng Y,et al. Effect of composition and microstructure of humic acid on 3,3',4,4'-tetrachlorobiphenyl sorption[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2018,25(15):14656-14665.
    [27] Tang Y F,Li X W,Dong B,et al. Effect of aromatic repolymerization of humic acid-like fraction on digestate phytotoxicity reduction during high-solid anaerobic digestion for stabilization treatment of sewage sludge[J]. Water Research,2018,143:436-444.
    [28] Xaba S A,Igberase E,Osayi J,et al. Optimization of primary sewage sludge and coal lignite by microwave- assisted pyrolysis for the production of bio-oil[J]. Environmental Technology,2022,43(5):658-672.
    [29] Wang Y H,Lu Y L,Wang L,et al. Analysis of the molecular composition of humic substances and their effects on physiological metabolism in maize based on untargeted metabolomics[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2023,14:1122621.
    [30] Wang X P,Yang J S,Zhang S J,et al. Effects of different amendments application on cotton growth and soil properties in arid areas[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences,2020,29(4):757-762. [王相平,杨劲松,张胜江,等. 改良剂施用对干旱盐碱区棉花生长及土壤性质的影响[J]. 生态环境学报,2020,29(4):757-762.]
    [31] Zhou L P,Yuan L,Zhao B Q,et al. Effects of single-sided application of humic acid on maize root growth[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2022,55(2):339-349. [周丽平,袁亮,赵秉强,等. 腐殖酸单侧刺激对玉米根系生长的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2022,55(2):339-349.]
    [32] Guo X S,Su X R,Fan Z Q,et al. Effects of combined application of controlled-release urea and humic acid on growth and antioxidant system of cotton seedlings under salt stress[J]. Soils,2021,53(1):112-117. [郭新送,苏秀荣,范仲卿,等. 盐分胁迫下控释尿素配施腐植酸对棉花幼苗生长和抗氧化系统的影响[J]. 土壤,2021,53(1):112-117.]
    [33] Gao S,Yang J S,Yao R J,et al. Effects of soil amelioration measures mitigating soil salinity and improving crop P uptake in coastal area of North Jiangsu[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2020,57(5):1219-1229. [高珊,杨劲松,姚荣江,等. 改良措施对苏北盐渍土盐碱障碍和作物磷素吸收的调控[J]. 土壤学报,2020,57(5):1219-1229.]
    [34] Zhou L P,Yuan L,Zhao B Q,et al. Advances in humic acid structures and their regulatory role in maize roots[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers,2022,28(2):334-343. [周丽平,袁亮,赵秉强,等. 腐植酸的组成结构及其对作物根系调控的研究进展[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2022,28(2):334-343.]
    [35] Nardi S,Pizzeghello D,Muscolo A,et al. Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2002,34(11):1527-1536.
    [36] Nardi S,Pizzeghello D,Gessa C,et al. A low molecular weight humic fraction on nitrate uptake and protein synthesis in maize seedlings[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2000,32(3):415-419.
    [37] Jing J Y,Zhang S Q,Yuan L,et al. Humic acid complex formation with urea alters its structure and enhances biomass production in hydroponic maize[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2022,102(9):3636-3643.
    [38] Sinha D,Tandon P K. An overview of nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium:Key players of nutrition process in plants[M]//Mishra K,Tandon P K,Srivastava S. Sustainable solutions for elemental deficiency and excess in crop plants. Singapore:Springer,2020:85-117.
    [39] Liu Y H,Feng X Y,Dong G H,et al. Effect of fertilization frequency on soil water,nitrogen transport and tomato yield under alternate partial root-zone drip irrigation[J]. Soils,2023,55(5):983-990. [刘宇航,冯许钰,董光华,等. 分根区交替滴灌施肥频率对土壤水氮运移及番茄产量的影响[J]. 土壤,2023,55(5):983-990.]
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

陈卓,张丛志,张佳宝,赵炳梓,潘慧.天然腐殖质改性材料的特性及其在滴灌方式下对玉米的促生作用[J].土壤学报,2025,62(2):459-471. DOI:10.11766/trxb202312170531 CHEN Zhuo, ZHANG Congzhi, ZHANG Jiabao, ZHAO Bingzi, PAN Hui. Characteristics of Natural Humus Modified Materials and Their Growth- promoting Effects on Maize Under Drip Irrigation[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2025,62(2):459-471.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:123
  • 下载次数: 350
  • HTML阅读次数: 376
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-17
  • 最后修改日期:2024-05-05
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-01-23
文章二维码