不同秸秆还田方式下砂姜黑土团聚体内颗粒有机质的空间分布特征——基于X射线CT技术和机器学习
作者:
中图分类号:

S152.4;S153.6

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFD1900204)、国家自然科学基金项目(41930753,42007007)资助


The Spatial Distribution of Particulate Organic Matter within Aggregates of Shajiang Black Soil Under Various Straw Return Practices Based on X-ray CT Technology and Machine Learning
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [38]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为优选培肥改良砂姜黑土的秸秆还田方式,该研究基于砂姜黑土连续6年耕作与秸秆还田定位试验,结合高分辨率X射线CT技术(XCT)和机器学习方法,探究不同秸秆还田方式(免耕还田、旋耕还田、深翻还田)对不同土层(0~10 cm、10~20 cm、20~40 cm)6~8 mm团聚体内颗粒有机质(particulate organic matter,POM)(包括新鲜残体和旧POM)空间分布及其孔隙特征的影响。研究结果表明:整体而言,三种秸秆还田处理下各土层中团聚体内POM以新鲜残体为主,占76.4%~87.0%;免耕还田处理下0~10 cm土层团聚体存在大量POM,其中新鲜残体和旧POM分布在连通性孔隙中的比例分别为0.788和0.569;深翻还田处理下20~40 cm土层团聚体POM体积密度较高,新鲜残体和旧POM分布在连通性孔隙中的比例分别为0.729和0.536。与旋耕还田相比,免耕还田使0~10 cm土层中团聚体内总POM和新鲜残体体积密度分别提高了54.4%和56.7%(P < 0.05);然而,在10~20 cm土层中,三种还田方式下新鲜残体和旧POM体积密度及其在连通性孔隙中的分布无显著性差异(P> 0.05);在20~40 cm土层中,与旋耕还田相比,深翻还田使总POM体积密度分别显著提高了2.78倍,其中新鲜残体和旧POM体积密度分别提高了3.10倍和1.72倍,同时显著提高了团聚体孔隙度(>16 μm)、连通孔隙度(P < 0.05)。综上所述,新鲜残体构成了POM主要成分,在免耕还田表层(0~10 cm)和深翻还田深层(20~40 cm)土壤中,团聚体内POM体积密度提升主要以通过新鲜残体体积密度显著增加实现的,连通性孔隙是新鲜残体累积和分解转化的重要场所。本研究认为深翻还田有利于深层(20~40 cm)土壤团聚体连通性孔隙形成和POM累积,对农田土壤质量提升和土壤固碳具有重要意义。

    Abstract:

    【Objective】 Protection of particulate organic matter (POM)within soil aggregates has been recognized to be one of the principal mechanisms of C sequestration in soil. The low soil organic carbon (SOC) content of Shajiang black soil is a major factor for limiting crop yields in the Huaibei plain. Increasing SOC sequestration by returning crop residues to the field has been recommended. No-tillage (NT), rotary tillage (RT), and deep tillage (DT) with straw return (S) are commonly implemented. The objective of this study was to evaluate the spatial distribution of POM within aggregates in Shajiang black soil under various straw return practices. 【Method】 The six-year field experiment was conducted using X-ray CT technology and machine learning. The soil aggregates (6-8 mm in diameter) were collected from depths of 0-10, 10-20, and 20-40 cm. POM is divided into two parts: fresh residue and old POM, based on its morphological characteristics. 【Results】Overall, the POM within aggregates was primarily composed of fresh residues, comprising 76.4% to 87.0% across various soil layers under three different straw return practices. The distribution ratio of fresh residues in connected pores ranged from 0.266 to 0.788, while the distribution ratio of old POM varied between 0.177 and 0.569. There was a substantial quantity of POM was distributed within aggregates under NTS treatment in the 0-10 cm soil layer. Fresh residues and old POM were primarily distributed in the connected pores, with the proportions of 0.788 and 0.569, respectively. In the 20-40 cm soil layer, POM volume density within aggregates was highest under DPS treatment among all the treatments. Specifically, the proportions of fresh residue and aged POM distributed in the connected pores were 0.729 and 0.536, respectively. In comparison to the RTS treatment, the NTS led to a significant change in both the total POM volume density and fresh residue volume density by 54.4% and 56.7% within the 0-10 cm soil layer (P < 0.05), respectively. Additionally, the NTS treatment resulted in a 25.5% increase in the proportion of fresh residues in connected pores and a remarkable 96.4% increase in its volume density (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the DPS treatment resulted in a reduction of 37.4% in total POM and 40.4% in fresh residue volume density within the 0-10 cm soil layer (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences observed in the total POM volume density, porosity (>16 μm), or connected porosity of the aggregates among the NTS, RTS and DPS treatments within the 10-20 cm soil layer (P > 0.05). Compared with the RTS, the DPS treatment led to a significant increase in the total POM volume density by 2.78 times within the 20-40 cm soil layer, with the fresh residue and old POM volume density increasing by 3.10 and 1.72 times (P < 0.05), respectively. Additionally, the DPS treatment significantly increased the porosity of aggregates (>16 μm) and connected porosity by 74.2% and 142.8% within the 20-40 cm soil layer (P < 0.05), while it increased the fresh residue volume density and old POM volume density in the connected pores by 9.41 times and 7.96 times (P < 0.05), respectively. 【Conclusion】 The substantial increase in POM volume density within aggregates primarily stems from a significant rise in fresh residue volume density observed in the topsoil (0-10 cm)under no-tillage, as well as in the deeper soil (20-40 cm)following deep ploughing with straw incorporation. Connected pores serve as pivotal reservoirs for the storage and transformation of fresh residue through decomposition processes. Our findings suggest that deep tillage promotes the formation of connected pores and POM accumulation in the deeper soil layers, which is significant for improving agricultural soil quality and soil carbon sequestration in Shajiang black soil.

    参考文献
    [1] Xu M G,Zhang X B,Sun N,et al. Advance in research of synergistic effects of soil carbon sequestration on crop yields improvement in croplands[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers,2017,23(6):1441-1449. [徐明岗,张旭博,孙楠,等. 农田土壤固碳与增产协同效应研究进展[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2017,23(6):1441-1449.]
    [2] Lavallee J M,Soong J L,Cotrufo M F. Conceptualizing soil organic matter into particulate and mineral- associated forms to address global change in the 21st century[J]. Global Change Biology,2020,26(1):261-273.
    [3] Six J,Elliott E T,Paustian K. Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation:A mechanism for C sequestration under no-tillage agriculture[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2000,32(14):2099-2103.
    [4] Six J,Callewaert P,Lenders S,et al. Measuring and understanding carbon storage in afforested soils by physical fractionation[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,2002,66(6):1981-1987.
    [5] Li J,Wu H J,Wu X P,et al. Long-term conservation tillage enhanced organic carbon and nitrogen contents of particulate organic matter in soil aggregates[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2021,54(2):334-344. [李景,吴会军,武雪萍,等. 长期免耕和深松提高了土壤团聚体颗粒态有机碳及全氮含量[J]. 中国农业科学,2021,54(2):334-344.]
    [6] Wu L J,Qi C,Yan Q Y,et al. Effects of tillage methods on soil aggregation and aggregate-associated carbon and nitrogen fractions in dryland wheat fields[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas,2023,41(2):193-200,220. [吴林甲,祁琛,闫秋艳,等. 耕作方式对旱地麦田土壤团聚体及其碳氮组分分布的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2023,41(2):193-200,220.]
    [7] Yan C R,Liu E K,He W Q,et al. Effect of different tillage on soil organic carbon and its fractions in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China,2010(6):58-63. [严昌荣,刘恩科,何文清,等. 耕作措施对土壤有机碳和活性有机碳的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2010(6):58-63.]
    [8] Ding T Y,Guo Z C,Qian Y Q,et al. Effects of straw return methods on the soil organic carbon fractions and pore structure characteristics of Shajiang black soil(Vertisol)[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2023,39(16):71-78. [丁天宇,郭自春,钱泳其,等. 秸秆还田方式对砂姜黑土有机碳组分和孔隙结构的影响[J]. 农业工程学报,2023,39(16):71-78.]
    [9] Wang N N. Effects of different tillage methods and straw returning on soil aggregates and organic carbon[D]. Daqing,Heilongjiang:Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University,2023. [王楠楠. 不同耕作方式和秸秆还田对土壤团聚体及有机碳的影响[D].黑龙江大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学,2023. ]
    [10] Elyeznasni N,Sellami F,Pot V,et al. Exploration of soil micromorphology to identify coarse-sized OM assemblages in X-ray CT images of undisturbed cultivated soil cores[J]. Geoderma,2012,179:38-45.
    [11] Peth S,Chenu C,Leblond N,et al. Localization of soil organic matter in soil aggregates using synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2014,78:189-194.
    [12] Kravchenko A N,Negassa W,Guber A K,et al. New approach to measure soil particulate organic matter in intact samples using X-ray computed microtomography[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,2014,78(4):1177-1185.
    [13] Schlüter S,Leuther F,Albrecht L,et al. Microscale carbon distribution around pores and particulate organic matter varies with soil moisture regime[J]. Nature Communications,2022,13(1):2098.
    [14] Kravchenko A N,Negassa W C,Guber A K,et al. Protection of soil carbon within macro-aggregates depends on intra-aggregate pore characteristics[J]. Scientific Reports,2015,5:16261.
    [15] Liang A Z,Zhang Y,Zhang X P,et al. Investigations of relationships among aggregate pore structure,microbial biomass,and soil organic carbon in a Mollisol using combined non-destructive measurements and phospholipid fatty acid analysis[J]. Soil and Tillage Research,2019,185:94-101.
    [16] Wang R Z,Hu X. Pore structure characteristics and organic carbon distribution of soil aggregates in alpine ecosystems in the Qinghai Lake Basin on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Catena,2023,231:107359.
    [17] Kravchenko A N,Guber A K. Soil pores and their contributions to soil carbon processes[J]. Geoderma,2017,287:31-39.
    [18] Schlüter S,Eickhorst T,Mueller C W. Correlative imaging reveals holistic view of soil microenvironments[J]. Environmental Science & Technology,2019,53(2):829-837.
    [19] Islam M U,Guo Z C,Jiang F H,et al. Does straw return increase crop yield in the wheat-maize cropping system in China? A meta-analysis[J]. Field Crops Research,2022,279:108447.
    [20] Rahman M T,Liu S,Guo Z C,et al. Impacts of residue quality and N input on aggregate turnover using the combined 13C natural abundance and rare earth oxides as tracers[J]. Soil and Tillage Research,2019,189:110-122.
    [21] Xiong P,Guo Z C,Li W,et al. Regional analysis of maize yield and physiochemical properties of Shajiang black soil(vertisol)in Huaibei Plain[J]. Soils,2021,53(2):391-397. [熊鹏,郭自春,李玮,等. 淮北平原砂姜黑土玉米产量与土壤性质的区域分析[J]. 土壤,2021,53(2):391-397.]
    [22] Zhou H,Li W Z,Zhang Z B,et al. Characterization of multi-scale soil structure with X-ray computed tomography[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2013,50(6):1226-1230. [周虎,李文昭,张中彬,等. 利用X射线CT研究多尺度土壤结构[J]. 土壤学报,2013,50(6):1226-1230.]
    [23] Bucka F B,Kölbl A,Uteau D,et al. Organic matter input determines structure development and aggregate formation in artificial soils[J]. Geoderma,2019,354:113881.
    [24] Berg S,Kutra D,Kroeger T,et al. Ilastik:Interactive machine learning for (bio)image analysis[J]. Nature Methods,2019,16:1226-1232.
    [25] Legland D,Arganda-Carreras I,Andrey P. MorphoLibJ:Integrated library and plugins for mathematical morphology with ImageJ[J]. Bioinformatics,2016,32(22):3532-3534.
    [26] Schlüter S,Roussety T,Rohe L,et al. Land use impact on carbon mineralization in well aerated soils is mainly explained by variations of particulate organic matter rather than of soil structure[J]. Soil,2022,8(1):253-267.
    [27] Gao H J,Peng C,Zhang X Z,et al. Effects of different straw returning modes on characteristics of soil aggregates in chernozem soil[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,33(1):75-79. [高洪军,彭畅,张秀芝,等. 不同秸秆还田模式对黑钙土团聚体特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2019,33(1):75-79.]
    [28] Tian K,Yang C H,Wu J D,et al. Effects of no-tillage on soil carbon composition and physical and chemical properties in different wheat-maize rotation fields[J]. Soils,2024,56(2):342-349. [田琨,杨彩红,吴建东,等. 免耕对不同麦玉轮作农田土壤碳组分及理化性质的影响[J]. 土壤,2024,56(2):342-349.]
    [29] Qian Y Q,Xiong P,Wang Y K,et al. Effect of tillage practices on soil pore structure characteristics in Shajiang Black Soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2024,6(1):52-63. [钱泳其,熊鹏,王玥凯,等. 不同耕作方式对砂姜黑土孔隙结构特征的影响[J]. 土壤学报,2024,61(1):52-63.]
    [30] Zhou J H,Chu J J,Sun W C,et al. Research progress on the effect of organic carbon on the formation of soil aggregates[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences,2023,52(11):10-20. [周家昊,褚军杰,孙万春,等. 有机碳对土壤团聚体形成的影响研究进展[J]. 河南农业科学,2023,52(11):10-20.]
    [31] Dong J X,Cong P,Liu N,et al. Effects of deep straw incorporation on subsoil physical properties and aggregate distribution in black soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2021,58(4):921-934. [董建新,丛萍,刘娜,等. 秸秆深还对黑土亚耕层土壤物理性状及团聚体分布特征的影响[J]. 土壤学报,2021,58(4):921-934.]
    [32] Song Y Y,Cao Y,Duan X Y,et al. Effects of different straw-returning depths on soil aggregate composition and organic carbon distribution[J]. Soils,2022,54(2):344-350. [宋依依,曹阳,段鑫盈,等. 秸秆还田深度对土壤团聚体组成及有机碳含量的影响[J]. 土壤,2022,54(2):344-350.]
    [33] Xia Z T,Cheng W W,Zhao J X,et al. Effects of different planting patterns on maize root system and soil aggregate stability[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences,2021,30(12):2331-2338. [夏梓泰,程伟威,赵吉霞,等. 不同种植模式对玉米根系及土壤团聚体稳定性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报,2021,30(12):2331-2338.]
    [34] Sodhi G P S,Beri V,Benbi D K. Soil aggregation and distribution of carbon and nitrogen in different fractions under long-term application of compost in rice-wheat system[J]. Soil and Tillage Research,2009,103(2):412-418.
    [35]
    [35]Tan W F,Xu Y,Shi Z H,et al. The formation process and stabilization mechanism of soil aggregates driven by binding materials[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2023,60(5):1297-1308. [谭文峰,许运,史志华,等. 胶结物质驱动的土壤团聚体形成过程与稳定机制[J].土壤学报,2023,60(5):1297-1308.]
    [36] De Gryze S,Jassogne L,Six J,et al. Pore structure changes during decomposition of fresh residue:X-ray tomography analyses[J]. Geoderma,2006,134(1/2):82-96.
    [37] Helliwell J R,Miller A J,Whalley W R,et al. Quantifying the impact of microbes on soil structural development and behaviour in wet soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2014,74:138-147.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

丁天宇,郭自春,王玥凯,蒋发辉,张平,彭新华.不同秸秆还田方式下砂姜黑土团聚体内颗粒有机质的空间分布特征——基于X射线CT技术和机器学习[J].土壤学报,2025,62(2):375-387. DOI:10.11766/trxb202401310052 DING Tianyu, GUO Zichun, WANG Yuekai, JIANG Fahui, ZHANG Ping, PENG Xinhua. The Spatial Distribution of Particulate Organic Matter within Aggregates of Shajiang Black Soil Under Various Straw Return Practices Based on X-ray CT Technology and Machine Learning[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2025,62(2):375-387.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:164
  • 下载次数: 483
  • HTML阅读次数: 409
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-31
  • 最后修改日期:2024-07-22
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-01-23
文章二维码