中国东北地区土壤黏化层厚度的数字制图
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Digital Mapping of Soil Argillic Horizon Thickness in Northeast China
Author:
Affiliation:

State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arable Land in China,the Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    黏化层是由土壤黏粒显著积累而形成的次生层,其厚度影响着淋溶土的土壤过程和植被生长。但迄今对黏化层的空间分布变化了解有限,对其预测报道也甚少。传统的认知主要依赖大规模实地调查与地统计学方法结合。为快速获取大范围的黏化层厚度空间信息,本研究将我国东北三省311个含黏化层的土壤剖面样点与环境协变量(地形、气候、生物和土壤因子共71个变量)相结合,构建一个相对可靠的预测模型。使用Pearson相关性分析和Boruta算法进行双重特征筛选后,采用分位数回归森林(Quantile regression forest,QRF)模型进行空间建模、交叉验证和不确定性估计。50次迭代的平均结果显示,模型预测的决定系数(R2)为0.32,均方根误差(Root mean square error,RMSE)为24.34 cm,平均绝对误差(Mean absolute error,MAE)为19.47 cm。预测区间覆盖概率(Prediction interval coverage percentage,PICP)显示,约有86.2%的验证样本落在预定义的90% PI范围内,这表明不确定性估计很大程度上是可靠的。在建模过程中,土壤变量和气候变量的重要性普遍高于生物变量和地形变量,其中土壤厚度(Soil thickness,ST)是最核心的驱动因子。相应的预测结果显示,在研究区内黏化层厚度沿西南—东北方向呈递减趋势。缺乏土壤调查点的地区具有较大的预测不确定性,后续研究应在这些区域设置适当的补充调查。该研究成果对于东北地区土地管理政策优化具有一定的指导意义。

    Abstract:

    【Objective】The argillic horizon is a subsurface secondary layer formed by the accumulation of soil clay particles, and its thickness exerts a crucial regulatory effect on soil processes and vegetation growth in Alfisols. Understanding its spatial distribution is critical for effective land management, particularly in agriculturally important regions such as Northeast China. However, there is still limited knowledge of the spatial variability in argillic horizon thickness, and predictive studies on this topic are scarce. Traditional understanding has largely relied on extensive field surveys combined with geostatistical methods, which are often resource-intensive and may not be efficient over large regions. This study aims to develop a robust predictive model to map the spatial distribution of argillic horizon thickness across the three northeastern provinces of China by integrating limited soil profile observations with a rich set of environmental covariates. 【Method】A total of 311 soil profile samples with argillic horizons were collected in Northeast China. These samples incorporated data from recent field surveys and historical soil records. Consistent with the SCORPAN framework, 71 environmental covariates were selected to correspond to relief, climate, organism, and soil factors. Dual feature selection was conducted via Pearson correlation analysis and the Boruta algorithm. The quantile regression forest (QRF) model was then adopted for spatial modeling, cross-validation, and uncertainty estimation. Rigorous evaluation of model performance and uncertainty estimation was conducted through 50 repetitions of 10-fold cross-validation, and accumulated local effects (ALE) plots were generated to interpret the relationship between key predictors and the target variable. 【Result】The average results from 50 iterations showed that the model achieved a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.32, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 24.34 cm, and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 19.47 cm. This performance is significantly superior to that of most regional and national scale soil thickness prediction studies (R2 = 0.11–0.41). The prediction interval coverage percentage (PICP) was 86.2%, which is close to the predefined 90% prediction interval (PI), indicating high reliability of the uncertainty estimation. Soil and climate factors were generally more influential than organism and relief factors, with soil thickness (ST) identified as the most critical driving factor. The spatial prediction results indicated a distinct decreasing trend in argillic horizon thickness from the southwest to the northeast. The western and southwestern regions of the study area exhibited the thickest argillic horizons (mostly over 80 cm, with some regions ranging from 100 to 125 cm), while the northern, eastern, and southeastern regions had thinner ones (mostly 20–35 cm, with some regions below 20 cm). High prediction uncertainty was concentrated in mountainous and hilly regions with sparse soil survey points. 【Conclusion】This study confirms the feasibility of mapping argillic horizon thickness using a machine learning approach combined with environmental covariates, even in large, complex landscapes with limited soil observations. Future research could focus on integrating proxies for parent material and pedogenic age to enhance model accuracy, as well as exploring the spatial prediction of other argillic horizon properties (e.g., upper boundary and compactness). This study not only addresses the gap in argillic horizon thickness prediction in Northeast China, but also offers valuable insights for optimizing regional land management strategies.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

黄埔,黄青,王经天,石宇涵,蔡盛红.中国东北地区土壤黏化层厚度的数字制图[J].土壤学报,,[待发表]
HUANG Pu, HUANG Qing, WANG Jingtian, SHI Yuhan, CAI Shenghong. Digital Mapping of Soil Argillic Horizon Thickness in Northeast China[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,,[In Press]

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-04
  • 最后修改日期:2026-02-02
  • 录用日期:2026-04-02
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码