某历史不规范填埋场及周边农田土壤微塑料污染特征与生态风险评估
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.华东理工大学资源与环境工程学院;2.上海环境卫生工程设计院有限公司

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFC3711600)资助


Microplastic Pollution Characteristics and Ecological Risk Assessment in Soils of a Historical Non-Sanitary Landfill and Adjacent Farmland
Author:
Affiliation:

1.State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Risk Assessment and Control for Chemical Processes,School of Resources and Environmental Engineering,East China University of Science and Technology;2.Shanghai Environment Sanitation Engineering Design Institute

Fund Project:

Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(No.2023YFC3711600)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    历史不规范填埋场因防渗系统缺失,持续向周边土壤释放微塑料(Microplastics, MPs),加剧场地及其周边环境的生态风险。本文以华东地区典型区域——浙江省嘉善县某历史不规范填埋场及周边农田表层土壤为研究对象,利用傅里叶变换显微红外光谱技术(Fourier Transform Infrared Microspectroscopy, µ-FTIR)结合污染负荷指数法(Pollution Load Index, PLI)、改进风险商法(Risk Characterization Ratio, RCR)、多特征潜在风险指数法(Multi-characteristics Potential Ecological Risk Index, MPERI)以及蒙特卡罗模拟,揭示了MPs污染分布特征及生态风险。结果表明:(1)填埋场土壤MPs丰度(7425.5~21306.5 个·kg⁻1)显著高于周边农田土壤(199.5~2868.5 个·kg⁻1),两地均以聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯(Polyethylene Terephthalate, PET)和聚乙烯(Polyethylene, PE)为主要类型(占比 > 70%),小尺寸MPs(< 1 mm)在填埋场和农田土壤中的占比分别为70.9%和66.3%,透明MPs占比达71.8%和53.1%,填埋场可能是农田MPs的重要输入源之一;(2)多方法风险评价显示,PLI判定填埋场属中高风险,而农田为中低风险,但RCR与MPERI均显示两地以中低风险为主,含聚丙烯腈(Polyacrylonitrile, PAN)点位风险显著升高;(3)蒙特卡罗模拟表明,农田PLI低风险概率显著大于填埋场,且RCR与MPERI可能低估了填埋场MPs的生态风险;敏感性分析显示,MPs的类型为生态风险贡献的关键参数。本研究通过实证-模型耦合分析,为历史不规范填埋场及周边环境MPs污染分级管控提供了科学依据,推动概率风险评估模型在污染场地的应用。

    Abstract:

    【Objective】Historically non-sanitary landfills continuously release microplastics(MPs) into adjacent soils due to the absence of impermeable lining systems, thereby exacerbating ecological risks at the site and in surrounding environments. This study aims to investigate the distribution characteristics and ecological risks of MPs in a historically non-sanitary landfill and adjacent farmland soils in Jiashan County, Zhejiang Province, East China. The research aims to identify key pollution sources and evaluate the efficacy of multi-method risk assessment frameworks for informing targeted pollution control strategies.【Method】For landfill sites and surrounding farmland topsoil, the distribution characteristics and ecological risks of microplastic pollution were revealed through the combined application of micro-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (µ-FTIR), the Pollution Load Index (PLI), Risk Characterization Ratio (RCR), the Multi-characteristics Potential Ecological Risk Index (MPERI), and Monte Carlo simulation.【Result】(1) Landfill soils exhibited significantly higher MPs abundance (7,425.5–21,306.5 items/kg) than farmland soils (199.5–2,868.5 items/kg). Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polyethylene (PE) were the main MP types in both sites (>70% of total MPs). Small-sized MPs (<1 mm) accounted for 70.9% in landfill soil and 66.3% in farmland soil, while transparent MPs comprised 71.8% and 53.1% in landfill and farmland soil, respectively. The landfill was identified as a potential source of farmland MPs. (2) Multi-model risk assessment revealed that PLI classified the landfill as medium-to-high risk and farmland as low-to-medium risk, whereas RCR and MPERI indicated low-to-medium risk for both. Risk escalated significantly at sites containing acrylonitrile resin (PAN). (3) Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that farmland had a higher probability of low PLI risk than the landfill. Nevertheless, both RCR and MPERI might underestimate ecological risks in the landfill. Sensitivity analysis identified MPs polymer type as the paramount parameter influencing risk outcomes.【Conclusion】The landfill acts as a critical source of MPs contamination in adjacent agricultural soils. Discrepancies in risk outcomes across models highlight the necessity of integrating multi-method assessments with probabilistic approaches (e.g., Monte Carlo) to quantify uncertainties. Polymer type is a decisive factor in ecological risk, necessitating prioritized controls for PAN-containing MPs. This empirical-modeling framework provides a scientific basis for hierarchical management of MPs pollution in non-sanitary landfills and surrounding environments, promoting the application of probabilistic risk models in contaminated sites.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张 鹏,彭 程,陈小艺,刘 惠,隋 倩,张 卫.某历史不规范填埋场及周边农田土壤微塑料污染特征与生态风险评估[J].土壤学报,DOI:10.11766/trxb202507040328,[待发表]
ZHANG Peng, PENG Cheng, CHEN Xiaoyi, LIU hui, SUI Qian, ZHANG Wei. Microplastic Pollution Characteristics and Ecological Risk Assessment in Soils of a Historical Non-Sanitary Landfill and Adjacent Farmland[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, DOI:10.11766/trxb202507040328,[In Press]

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-04
  • 最后修改日期:2025-08-27
  • 录用日期:2025-09-03
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-09-04
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码