利用生态系统多功能性评估三种调理剂对酸性红壤的改良效果
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.华中农业大学资源与环境学院;2.咸宁市生态环境局崇阳县分局;3.浙江省农业科学院环境资源与土壤肥料研究所

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Assessment of Three Amendments for Improving Acid-Red Soil Using Ecosystem Multifunctionality
Author:
Affiliation:

1.College of Resources and Environment,Huazhong Agricultural University;2.Xianning Ecological and Environment Bureau, Chongyang Branch;3.Institute of Environmental Resources,Soil and Fertilizer,Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为全面评估调理剂施用对酸性红壤的改良效果,本研究选取蚓粪-牡蛎壳粉-生物炭复合调理剂(C)、高碱度生物炭调理剂(B)和硅钙钾镁调理剂(S)3种酸性土壤调理剂,以不施用调理剂为对照(CK),在浙江省诸暨市酸性红壤区开展大田试验,通过测定土壤酸度、养分供给、微生物群落特性及植物生产力4大类指标中筛选的共20个反映基本生态过程的具体指标,解析其对生态系统多功能性(EMF)的影响。结果表明:与CK相比,3种调理剂均能有效降低土壤酸度,其中B处理降酸效果最佳,交换性Al3+和交换性酸总量降幅分别达61.81%和62.23%;与CK相比,C处理显著提高土壤全量养分和速效磷含量,增幅14.99%~22.43%;与CK相比,3种调理剂均显著提高细菌多样性和均匀度,C和S处理还增强了细菌群落稳定性;植物生产力方面,B和C处理产量较CK提高了26.87%和25.47%,S处理地上生物量较CK提升27.30%。生态系统多功能性评价显示,C、B、S处理的EMF较CK分别提高112.38%、95.98%和129.71%。研究结果表明,调理剂施用可显著提升酸性土壤的生态系统多功能性,但对各具体生态指标的作用大小存在一定差异,在实践应用中应依据酸性土壤特点及存在的复合障碍类型选择适宜的土壤调理剂进行施用。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: 【Objective】This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the ameliorative effects of amendments application on acid red soil. 【Method】A field trial was conducted in an acid red soil region of Zhuji City, Zhejiang Province. Three acid soil amendments were tested: a vermicompost-oyster shell powder-biochar composite amendment (C), a high-alkalinity biochar amendment (B), and a silicon-calcium-potassium-magnesium amendment (S), with an untreated control (CK). Through the measurement of twenty specific indicators selected from four major categories (soil acidity, nutrient supply, microbial community characteristics, and plant productivity) that reflect fundamental ecological processes, we analyzed the effects of different treatments on ecosystem multifunctionality (EMF). 【Result】The results showed that compared with CK, three amendments significantly reduced soil acidity, with B treatment demonstrating the most pronounced acid-reducing effect (61.81% decrease in exchangeable Al3+ and 62.23% decrease in exchangeable acidity). C treatment elevated total nutrients and available phosphorus content by 14.99%-22.43% relative to CK. Compared with CK, all amendments significantly increased bacterial diversity and evenness, while C and S treatments further enhanced bacterial community stability. Regarding plant productivity, B and C treatments increased yields by 26.87% and 25.47%, respectively, compared with CK, while treatment S enhanced aboveground biomass by 27.30% relative to CK. Evaluation of ecosystem multifunctionality revealed that C, B, and S treatments improved EMF by 112.38%, 95.98%, and 129.71%, respectively, compared with CK. 【Conclusion】These findings demonstrate that while amendments significantly enhanced EMF in acid soil, their effects on specific ecological indicators vary. Therefore, during practical implementation, suitable soil amendments should be selected and applied based on the characteristics and types of the acid soil.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

万方,明润廷,那立苹,顾雨雨,王薇,胡红青,谭文峰,伍玉鹏.利用生态系统多功能性评估三种调理剂对酸性红壤的改良效果[J].土壤学报,,[待发表]
WAN Fang, MING Run-ting, NA Li-ping, GU Yu-yu, WANG Wei, HU Hong-qing, TAN Wen-feng, WU Yu-peng. Assessment of Three Amendments for Improving Acid-Red Soil Using Ecosystem Multifunctionality[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,,[In Press]

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-05
  • 最后修改日期:2026-03-05
  • 录用日期:2026-04-15
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码