黄土残塬沟壑区典型植被恢复类型的长期土壤水分动态及其驱动因素
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

北京林业大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(42371114)和中央高校基本业务项目(QNTD202508)资助


Long-term Soil Volumetric Water Dynamics and Driving Factors of Typical Vegetation Restoration Types in the Loess Hilly-Gully Region
Author:
Affiliation:

Beijing Forestry University

Fund Project:

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No. 42371114) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. QNTD202508)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为遏制土壤退化趋势和提升生态环境质量,黄土高原地区开展了大规模、长期的植被恢复工程,而典型植被恢复类型的长期土壤水分动态变化差异,特别是土壤水分变异性和差异性仍需深入探讨。为此,本研究选取黄土残塬沟壑区典型人工林(油松林、侧柏林、刺槐林)与天然林(辽东栎次生林),基于长时间序列(2006年—2025年)0~200 cm土壤水分动态变化,结合多期土壤理化性质、植被生长属性数据,采用单因素方差分析、主成分分析、Mantel test分析等统计方法,探讨林下土壤理化性质及植被生长参数在长期植被恢复中对林下土壤水文动态的影响。结果表明:(1)不同植被恢复类型存在显著的土壤水分差异性:与人工林相比,天然次生林的土壤水分含量整体较高,平均土壤含水量为16.8%,月均峰值可达30.4%,且具有较高的水分稳定性,变异系数平均值为12.89%; (2)不同植被恢复类型在土壤理化性质和植被属性方面存在显著差异,天然次生林的土壤氮(236.428 mg·kg-1)、磷(488.575 mg·kg-1)和有机碳含量(14.903 g·kg-1)高于其他三种人工林;乔木层和灌木层的生物量、高度等植被属性低于人工林;(3)主成分分析和Mantel test分析表明:土壤水分差异性主要由乔木属性和林下植被属性共同影响,而土壤水分变异性则主要受林下植被属性主导影响。该研究可为该区域天然次生林保护、人工林林下植被配置优化、强化林下植被培育提升水源涵养能力及水土保持管理提供理论依据。

    Abstract:

    [Objective]To curb the trend of soil degradation and improve ecological environment quality, large-scale and long-term vegetation restoration projects have been carried out in the Loess Plateau region. However, the long-term variations in soil volumetric water under typical vegetation restoration types, especially the variability and differences in soil moisture, have not been given in-depth attention. [Method]Therefore, this study selected typical artificial forests (Pinus tabuliformis, Platycladus orientalis, Robinia pseudoacacia) and natural forests (Quercus mongolica secondary forest) in the Loess Plateau remnant gully area as the subject focus. Based on a long-term sequence (2006—2025) of 0~200 cm soil volumetric water dynamics, combined with multi-phase soil physicochemical properties and vegetation growth attribute data, this study used one-way analysis of variance, principal component analysis, and Mantel test to explore the effects of soil physicochemical properties and vegetation growth parameters on the soil hydrological dynamics in long-term vegetation restoration. [Result]The results show that: (1) Significant soil moisture differences exist between vegetation restoration types: compared to artificial forests, the natural forest has a higher overall soil volumetric water content, with an average of 16.8% and a peak of 30.4%, and greater moisture stability, with an average coefficient of variation of 12.89%; (2) Significant differences exist in soil physicochemical properties and vegetation attributes among different vegetation restoration types. The natural forest has higher nitrogen (236.428 mg·kg-1), phosphorus (488.575 mg·kg-1), and organic carbon content (14.903 g·kg-1) than the three artificial forests. The biomass and height of the tree and shrub layers are lower in the natural forest than in the artificial forests; (3) Principal component analysis and Mantel test analysis show that soil moisture differences are mainly influenced by both tree and understory vegetation attributes, while soil moisture variability is predominantly influenced by understory vegetation attributes. [Conclusion]This study can provide a theoretical basis for the conservation of natural forests in the region, the optimization of understory vegetation in plantations, the enhancement of water conservation capacity through the cultivation of understory vegetation, and the management of soil and water conservation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

闫亚茹,冯天骄,刘亚博,吴天宇,王 平.黄土残塬沟壑区典型植被恢复类型的长期土壤水分动态及其驱动因素[J].土壤学报,2026,63(4). DOI:10.11766/trxb202510090489 YAN Yaru, FENGTianjiao, LIU Yabo, WU Tianyu, WANG Ping. Long-term Soil Volumetric Water Dynamics and Driving Factors of Typical Vegetation Restoration Types in the Loess Hilly-Gully Region[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2026,63(4).

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-09
  • 最后修改日期:2026-01-29
  • 录用日期:2026-03-10
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-04-15
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码