基于电阻率层析成像的河套灌区土壤剖面浸提液电导率反演
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.华南农业大学资源环境学院;2.中国科学院南京土壤研究所

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Inversion of Electrical Conductivity of Soil Profile Extracts Using Electrical Resistivity Tomography in the Hetao Irrigation District
Author:
Affiliation:

1.The College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University;2.Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    构建西北盐渍化区土壤剖面浸提液电导率(EC1:5)反演模型,以期为盐渍化土壤快速监测和分区分类改造利用提供科学依据。以河套灌区典型盐碱耕地为研究对象,运用电阻率层析成像(ERT)技术获取35.5~71 m长、0~6 m深的土壤剖面电阻率,同步采集9个钻孔点3~5 m深度的土壤分层样品,测定土壤EC1:5、含水量和容重。基于土壤发生学理论,选取土壤电阻率、深度、含水量和容重作为输入变量,采用随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)、极端梯度提升树(XGBoost)和线性回归(LM)算法,构建田块尺度剖面土壤EC1:5反演模型。结果表明,土壤电阻率和深度为土壤EC1:5反演的关键变量,含水量和容重贡献相对较低;不同模型中,RF模型表现最优,独立验证精度的R²为0.65,均方根误差(RMSE)为56.51 μS·cm?¹,且较好地匹配了9个钻孔实测土壤EC1:5的垂直变化特征。反演的土壤EC1:5在二维剖面上呈现显著的空间异质性,介于170.58~441.01 μS·cm-1之间,均值为275.48±58.81 μS·cm-1,与土壤电阻率变化特征相反。基于ERT的土壤剖面EC1:5反演模型具有良好的适用性,可弥补电磁感应(EMI)技术在垂向分辨率上的不足,为土壤剖面高分辨盐分信息的快速获取提供了可靠技术。

    Abstract:

    【Objective】This study aimed to provide a scientific basis for rapid monitoring and regionalized classification-based reclamation of salinized soils by constructing an inversion model for electrical conductivity (EC1:5) of soil profile extracts in salinized areas of Northwest China.【Method】Typical saline-alkali farmland in the Hetao Irrigation District was selected as the study area. Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) was used to obtain soil resistivity profiles with lengths of 35.5~71 m and depths of 0–6 m. Meanwhile, nine boreholes (3~5 m deep) were sampled by layers to measure soil EC1:5, water content, and bulk density. Based on pedogenetic theory, soil resistivity, depth, water content, and bulk density were selected as input variables. Random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and linear regression (LM) algorithms were applied to perform EC1:5 inversion at a field scale.【Result】The results indicate that soil resistivity and depth were the dominant variables controlling EC1:5 inversion, while water content and bulk density had relatively minor contributions. Among the models, the RF model achieved the best performance, with an independent validation R² of 0.65 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 56.51 μS·cm?¹, effectively matching the vertical variation characteristics of electrical conductivity measured in the nine boreholes. The inverted soil EC1:5 exhibited significant spatial heterogeneity on the two-dimensional profile, ranging from 170.58 to 441.01 μS·cm?¹, with a mean value of 275.48 ± 58.81 μS·cm?¹, which is opposite to the variation characteristics of soil resistivity.【Conclusion】The ERT-based inversion method for soil profile EC1:5 demonstrated good applicability and can effectively compensate for the limited vertical resolution of electromagnetic induction (EMI) techniques. It provides reliable technology for the rapid acquisition of high-resolution salinity information in soil profiles.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘雪莲,吴华勇,王慧慧,卢瑛,杨飞,赵玉国,张甘霖.基于电阻率层析成像的河套灌区土壤剖面浸提液电导率反演[J].土壤学报,,[待发表]
LIU xuelian, WU Huayong, Wang Huihui, Lu Ying, Yang Fei, Zhao Yuguo, Zhang Ganlin. Inversion of Electrical Conductivity of Soil Profile Extracts Using Electrical Resistivity Tomography in the Hetao Irrigation District[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,,[In Press]

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-02
  • 最后修改日期:2026-05-28
  • 录用日期:2026-07-02
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码