三种重采样方法对冲沟坡度坡长因子的影响
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(41101348,41101360);西华师范大学基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(15C002);绵阳师范学院四川省生态安全与保护重点实验室(ESP1606)


Difference Analysis of Three Resampling Methods for Calculating LS of Gullies Different in Development Stage
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos. 41101348, 41101360);Basic Research Projects Financed from the Special Fund of China West Normal University(No. 15C002); Ecological Security and Protection Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province,Mianyang Normal University (No.ESP1606)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为探索不同重采样方法对形态差异明显的冲沟坡度坡长(Slope length and slope steepness,LS)因子的影响,以元谋县干热河谷1:5000比例尺的等高线矢量数据为基础,在ArcGIS平台下构建六条典型冲沟2m分辨率的数字高程模型(Digital elevation model, DEM),采用最邻近(Nearest,Near)、双线性(Bilinear,Bil)、三次卷积(Cubic,Cub)重采样的DEM计算LS,通过相对差系数、LS因子分级面积比例、XY散点图对比分析三种重采样方法计算冲沟LS的差异性。结果表明:Near重采样计算的LS值与Bil、Cub重采样计算的LS值差异较大,相关程度低,Bil与Cub重采样计算的LS值差异较小,相关程度高;冲沟刚发育时,Cub重采样要优于Near和Bil,冲沟侵蚀强烈时,Near重采样要优于Bil和Cub,冲沟形态稳定时,Bil重采样要优于Cub和Near。

    Abstract:

    【Objective】Multi-resolution DEM (digital elevation model)resample plays the important role in multi-scale DEM conversion, this paper was aiming to investigate influences of the use of difference resampling methods to calculate LS of gullies different in development stage. 【Method】Based on the vector data in the 1:5000 scale contour map of the Ganre River Valley inYuanmou County, DEMs, 2m in resolution, of six typical gullies were established on the ArcGIS platform, using three different resampling methods, known as Near (Nearest neighbor), Bil (Bilinear interpolation) and Cubic(Cubic convolution), and LS(Slope Length and Slope Steepness, LS) calculated for comparison quantitatively. Differences between the three methods in LS calculation were analyzed by comparison of the methods in relative difference coefficient, area percentage of LS factor grades, and XY scatter plot.【Result】Results of the paper are summarized as follows: (1) Near is significantly different from Bil and Cub in LS value, while Bil and Cub methods have no significant difference between each other;(2)Bil, rather than Near and Cub, is the most appropriate choice for gullies at their young stage; Near is better than Bil and Cub for gullies at their erosion stage; Cub is more suitable than Near and Bil for gullies at their stable stage.【Conclusion】In conclusion, the research described in this paper has shown that the choice of resampling methods has potentially important consequences for the calculation of LS value of gullies different in development stage.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

梁倍瑜,徐亚莉,罗明良,白雷超,慕 凯,岳彦利.三种重采样方法对冲沟坡度坡长因子的影响[J].土壤学报,2018,55(1):64-74. DOI:10.11766/trxb201706140087 LIANG Beiyu, XU Yali, LUO Mingliang, BAI Leichao, MU Kai, YUE Yanli. Difference Analysis of Three Resampling Methods for Calculating LS of Gullies Different in Development Stage[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2018,55(1):64-74.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-06
  • 最后修改日期:2017-09-25
  • 录用日期:2017-09-26
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-10-30
  • 出版日期: