秸秆均匀还田对东北地区黑钙土土壤理化性质及玉米产量的影响
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD0201801)和吉林省科技厅重大科技招标专项(20150203004NY)共同资助


Effects of Straw Return on Soil Physico-chemical Properties of Chernozem in Northeast China and Maize Yield Therein
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFD0201801) and the Research Foundation of the Science & Technology Agency of Jilin Province, China (No. 20150203004NY)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为明确秸秆均匀还田在农业生产中推广应用的可行性,以吉林省农安县正邦农场黑钙土为研究对象,设置CK(未施用秸秆)、EIS(秸秆均匀还田)、SM(秸秆覆盖还田)、SP(秸秆翻压还田)共四种处理,通过环刀法及土壤紧实度仪测量土壤容重及土壤紧实度,湿筛法及干筛法测定土壤团聚体组成,腐殖质组成修改法提取土壤胡敏酸及富里酸,红外光谱法测定土壤胡敏酸结构特征,并对玉米产量进行计算。结果表明:秸秆还田有效降低了土壤容重及土壤紧实度,增加了土壤有机碳含量,有效促进了土壤腐殖质积累,显著提高了玉米产量,其效果在秸秆均匀还田处理中最为明显。与CK相比,EIS处理显著降低了土壤容重及土壤紧实度,降低幅度分别为33.11%、24.3%;EIS处理增加了土壤平均当量直径(MWD)、水稳系数(K)及大于0.25 mm 团聚体组分含量,增加幅度分别为56.86%、33.69%及16.21%;EIS处理的土壤有机碳、腐殖质碳、胡敏酸碳和富里酸碳含量明显增加,增加幅度分别为27.8%、44.2%、63.3%及33.8%。EIS处理同时促进了秸秆的腐解与转化,促使土壤胡敏酸结构氧化度和缩合度呈下降趋势,脂族链烃和芳香碳含量增加,土壤胡敏酸结构简单化、年轻化。该结果对于指导东北地区秸秆还田实践具有重要意义。

    Abstract:

    【Objective】With developing agriculture, the amount of crop residues increases, too, posing a serious environmental concern of how to rationally utilize the by-product. Incorporation of crop residue into the field is one of the optimal ways to recycle crop residue. In Northeast China, straw is returned into the field normally in two ways. One is to plow the returned straw into soil, and the other leave the straw over on the surface of the field as mulch. However, the traditional ways do have some shortcomings, for instance, the returned straw is hard to decompose in the soil; it affects seedling emergence; it makes tillage difficult, and so on. Consequently a now straw returning method is, hereby, invented, that is, even incorporation of straw (EIS), which is implemented in two steps, 1) straw is crashed into pieces, 1~2 cm in length and spread over the field by the combine harvesting the crop; and 2) the straw is plowed evenly into the 0~70 cm soil layer, using the crashing-ridging technology. When the new method is applied, the soil pan is tilled loose, thus reducing the soil bulk density, and improving the soil structure. However, so far little has been done on effects of this new straw incorporation method on soil physico-chemical properties and maize yields. Therefore, in this study, a field experiment was carried out to evaluate effects of EIS on soil physico-chemical properties and maize yields by comparing EIS with other straw returning modes or methods.【Method】The field experiment, laid out in a mono-cropping maize field of chernozem soil in the Zhengbang Farm of Nong'an County, Jilin Province, was designed to have four treatments, i.e. Treatment CK (no straw returned), Treatment SM (straw returned as mulch), Treatment EIS (straw incorporated evenly into the soil using the crashing-ridging technique) and Treatment SP (straw plowed into the soil). Soil bulk density was determined plot by plot using the cutting ring method, and soil compactness, too, with a soil compactness meter; soil aggregates composition analyzed with the dry-sieving and wet-sieving methods; and fulvic acid (FA) and humic acid (HA) extracted with the modified humus component extraction method for analysis of structure with the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Besides, maize yields of the treatments were calculated.【Result】Compared with CK, Treatment EIS and Treatment SP significantly reduced soil bulk density by 33.11% and 28.38%, respectively, and Treatment SM did only by 12.16%, and similar trends were found in terms of effects on soil compactness. As for content of >0.25 mm water-stable soil aggregates, Treatment EIS was 16.71%, 13.18% and 24.29% higher than Treatment CK, SP and SM, respectively. However, all the straw returning treatments increased mean weight diameter (MWD) and water stability coefficient (K), as compared with CK. Treatment EIS, SP and SM was 80.28%, 61.69% and 47.04% higher than Treatment CK in MWD, and 33.69%, 23.71% and 11.40% higher in K. Moreover, Treatment EIS, SP and SM increased soil organic carbon content in the surface soil layer by 27.8%, 15.9% and 7.5%, respectively. Meanwhile, Treatment EIS significantly increased the content of soil humus substances (HEC), soil humic acid carbon (HAC) and fulvic acid (FAC) by 47.6%, 63.3% and 33.8%, respectively, as compared with CK. Among all the straw returning treatments, Treatment EIS was the most significant in effect of increasing the content of HEC, HAC and FAC, being, 28.2%, 26.3% and 30.4%, respectively, higher than Treatment SP and 8.2%, 12.1% and 4.3%, respectively, higher than Treatment SM. Treatments EIS and SP increased soil HAC/FAC, too, being 25% and 21.6% than CK. Moreover, Treatment EIS altered the composition of humus more significantly than all the other treatments, by increasing the proportion of alkyl C and the ratio of aliphatic C/aromatic C, but Treatment SP was relatively higher than Treatment EIS in effect of raising the content of aromatic C.【Conclusion】All the findings in this experiment demonstrate that straw returning decreased soil bulk density and soil compactness, accelerated the accumulation of soil organic C and various components of humus, significantly changed the content of >0.25 mm soil water-stable aggregates and the values of mean weight diameter (MWD) and K, improved the structure of soil HA and increased maize yield, with the practice of EIS (even incorporation of straw) in particular, which suggests that the practice of EIS might be an ideal straw returning method to improve physico-chemical properties of the soil and maize yield.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

范 围,吴景贵,李建明,何瑞成,姚颜莹,王笃超,孙 玲,王彩云.秸秆均匀还田对东北地区黑钙土土壤理化性质及玉米产量的影响[J].土壤学报,2018,55(4):835-846. DOI:10.11766/trxb201709260363 FAN Wei, WU Jinggui, LI Jianming, HE Ruicheng, YAO Yanying, WANG Duchao, SUN Ling, WANG Caiyun. Effects of Straw Return on Soil Physico-chemical Properties of Chernozem in Northeast China and Maize Yield Therein[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2018,55(4):835-846.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-15
  • 最后修改日期:2017-11-14
  • 录用日期:2017-12-05
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-04-24
  • 出版日期: