关中地区塿土系统分类归属及代表土系建立
作者:
中图分类号:

S155.3

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(41877007)资助


Attribution of Lou Soil in Chinese Soil Taxonomy and Establishment of Representative Soil Series in Guanzhong Area
Author:
Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41877007)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [43]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    塿土是关中地区受人为长期土粪堆垫而在原土壤表层形成明显堆垫层的重要农业土壤,其分类一直备受关注。为了解塿土的成土特点及系统分类归属,选取关中地区18个典型塿土剖面,通过野外成土因素、剖面形态调查与土样分析测定,依据中国土壤系统分类方案,确定其在高级和基层分类单元归属。结果表明,供试剖面包含堆垫表层、黏化层、钙积层等9个诊断层和诊断特性,隶属5个亚类,其中3个剖面为钙积土垫旱耕人为土,2个剖面为斑纹土垫旱耕人为土,8个剖面为普通土垫旱耕人为土,4个剖面为堆垫简育干润淋溶土,1个剖面为普通简育干润雏形土;按土族划分标准,可分为9个土族,其中13个剖面颗粒大小级别为黏壤质,5个为壤质;16个剖面矿物学类型为硅质混合型,2个剖面为混合型,土壤温度状况均为温性,14个剖面为石灰性,4个剖面为非酸性;按土系划分标准,18个剖面可划分为18个不同的土系。相关文献的71个塿土剖面的统计结果表明,堆垫层厚度介于17~97 cm,平均厚度为50.07 cm,因此堆垫表层以50 cm厚度为检索标准是适宜于划分典型塿土的高级分类归属的。为进一步完善中国土壤系统分类,强化对具有堆垫现象的雏形土有更强的区分能力和分类的准确性,建议在简育干润雏形土土类下增设堆垫简育干润雏形土亚类。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] Lou soil is an important agricultural soil that has an apparent cumulic epipedon formed on the top as a result of long-term dung stacking therein in the Guanzhong Region of Shaanxi Province, and its classification has received much attention. In order to explore its pedogenic characteristics and attribution in the soil taxonomy and to establish a perfect representative soil system, a total of 18 typical Lou soil profiles were selected in the region.[Method] Of the 18 soil profiles, natural soil forming factors and morphologies were studied and in reference to the Manual of Field Soil Description and Sampling, soil samples collected for analysis of physicochemical properties in reference to the Soil Survey Laboratory Methods. On such a basis, diagnostic horizons and diagnostic characteristics of the selected soil profiles were determined, and their attributions in the Chinese Soil Taxonomy (CST) at the higher and basic category levels defined.[Result] The selected Lou soil profiles were found to have 2 diagnostic surface horizons (cumulic epipedon, ochric epipedon), 3 diagnostic subsurface horizons (argic horizon, calcic horizon and cambic horizon) and 6 diagnostic characteristics (calcaric property, redox features, mesic soil temperature regimes, ustic soil moisture regimes, cumulic evidence and calcic evidence). Thickness of the cumulic epipedon was the key indicator for determining attribution of the Lou soil at the order level. Of the 18 profiles, 13 were sorted into orthic anthrosols with a corresponding cumulic epipedon diagnostic horizon, 4 into ustic argosols, and 1 into ustic cambosols with a corresponding 20~50cm thick cumulic epipedon. They were attributed to 3 subgroups (Calcic Earth-cumuli-Orthic Anthrosols, Mottlic Earth-cumuli-Orthic Anthrosols and typic Earth-cumuli-Orthic Anthrosols) under Group Orthic Anthrosols, one to Subgroup Cumulic Hapli-Ustic Argosols under Group Ustic Argosols and one to Subgroup Typic Hapli-Ustic Cambosols under Group Ustic Cambosols. According to the criteria for sorting at the soil family and soil series levels in CST, they could be sorting into nine soil families (clay loamy mixed type mesic temperature-Calcic Earth-cumuli-Orthic Anthrosols, etc.) and 18 soil series (Yangling series, etc.). Attributes of the Lou soil profiles in the CST and the Chinese Soil Genetic Classification (CSGC), did not always match, for example, three different soil series (Yangling series, Zhenyuan Series and Linping Series) in the CST corresponding to the same soil species (Red oil soil) in the CSGC. The statistics of 71 Lou soil profiles in relevant literatures shows that the cumulic epipedons in the Lou soils varied in range of 17-97 cm in thickness, and averaged to be 50.07 cm.[Conclusion] Compared with the Chinese Soil Genetic Classification, the Chinese Soil Taxonomy reflects and characterizes more accurately differences between the soils in soil development process and degree. The criterion of 50 cm thick cumulic epipedon is appropriate for classification of Lou at high levels soil. In order to improve the ability and accuracy of classification of prototype soils with cumulic phenomenon, it is suggested that the subgroup of Cumulic-Hapli-Ustic Cambosols under Group Hapli-Ustic Cambosols should be added in the CST.

    参考文献
    [1] Chinese Soil Taxonomy Research Group,Institute of Soil Science,Academy Sciences,Cooperative Research Group on Chinese Soil Taxonomy. Keys to Chinese Soil Taxonomic Classification. 3rd ed. Hefei:University of Science and Technology of China Press,2001.[中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤系统分类课题组,中国土壤系统分类课题研究协作组.中国土壤系统分类检索. 第3版. 合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社,2001.]
    [2] Hseung Y. Soil in China.2nd ed. Beijing:Science Press,1987.[熊毅. 中国土壤(第二版). 北京:科学出版社,1987.]
    [3] Gong Z T,Chen Z C,Zhang G L. World reference base for soil resources(WRB):Establishment and development[J]. Soils,2003,35(4):271-278.[龚子同,陈志诚,张甘霖. 世界土壤资源参比基础(WRB):建立和发展[J].土壤,2003,35(4):271-278.]
    [4] Soil Survey Staff. Keys to soil taxonomy. 12th ed. United States Department of Agriculture,Natural Resources Conservation Service. Washington,DC:United States Government Printing Office,2014.
    [5] Wu K N,Gao X C,Zha L S,et al. Soil taxonomy of artificial soils containing artifacts typical of Henan Province[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2017,54(5):1091-1101.[吴克宁,高晓晨,查理思,等. 河南省典型含有人工制品土壤的系统分类研究[J]. 土壤学报,2017,54(5):1091-1101.]
    [6] Peng T,Zhang L,Sheng H,et al. Soil taxonomy of paddy soils developed from Quaternary laterite in eastern Hunan Province in China[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2018,46(20):324-328.[彭涛,张亮,盛浩,等. 湘东第四纪红土发育水稻土在中国土壤系统分类中的归属[J]. 江苏农业科学,2018,46(20):324-328.]
    [7] Qu X L,Long H Y,Xie P,et al. Pedogenesis and taxonomy of anthropogenic-alluvial soil in the Ningxia Yellow River irrigation zone[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2017,54(5):1102-1114.[曲潇琳,龙怀玉,谢平,等. 宁夏引黄灌区灌淤土的成土特点及系统分类研究[J]. 土壤学报,2017,54(5):1102-1114.]
    [8] Meuser H,Blume H P. Characteristics and classification of anthropogenic soils in the Osnabrück area,Germany[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science,2001,164(4):351-358.
    [9] Du G H,Zhang G L,Gong Z T. Placement of paddy soils of the Yangtze Delta in the Chinese Soil Taxonomy[J]. Soils,2007,39(5):684-691.[杜国华,张甘霖,龚子同. 长江三角洲水稻土主要土种在中国土壤系统分类中的归属[J]. 土壤,2007,39(5):684-691.]
    [10] Jia H Y. Preliminary study on the formation of ancient man-made soil in China-Formation of irrigated silt,Lou Soil and thick mature soil[J]. Agricultural Archaeology,1997(3):196-201.[贾恒义. 中国古代人为土形成初探-灌淤土、塿土和厚熟土之形成[J]. 农业考古,1997(3):196-201.]
    [11] Du J. Chinese anthrosols research and its agricultural cultural properties[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University(Social Science Edition),2017,16(5):124-131.[杜鹃. 中国人为土的文化属性及其研究进展[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,16(5):124-131.]
    [12] Du J. Study on the formation of tillage horizon in Guanzhong Plain[D]. Xi'an:Shaanxi Normal University,2014.[杜娟. 关中平原土壤耕作层形成过程研究[D]. 西安:陕西师范大学,2014.]
    [13] Pan J X. Formation and maturation of Lou Soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science,1961,5(2):20-25.[潘季香. 塿土的形成和熟化[J]. 土壤通报,1961,5(2):20-25.]
    [14] Liu P S. Soil structure and fertility of Guanzhong Lou Soil[J]. Journal of Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forest,1980,44(1):17-29.[刘鹏生. 关中塿土的土体构造及其肥力[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报,1980,44(1):17-29.]
    [15] Pang J L,Huang C C,Zha X C,et al. Forming process of diagnostic horizon of Loutu soil and its significance in Guanzhong areas[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2008,41(4):1064-1072.[庞奖励,黄春长,查小春,等. 关中地区塿土诊断层的形成过程及意义探讨[J]. 中国农业科学,2008,41(4):1064-1072.]
    [16] Zhu X M. Lou soil[M]. Beijing:Agriculture Press,1964.[朱显谟. 塿土[M]. 北京:农业出版社,1964.]
    [17] Gong Z T,et al. Chinese Soil Taxonomy:Theory,method and practice[M]. Beijing:Science Press,1999.[龚子同,等. 中国土壤系统分类:理论·方法·实践[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1999.]
    [18] Liu D S. Loess and environment[M]. Beijing:Science Press,1985.[刘东生. 黄土与环境[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1985.]
    [19] Huang C C. The deterioration of land resources and the change in human-earth relationships in the Weihe River Basin at 3100 a B.P.[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2001,14(1):30-35.[黄春长. 渭河流域3100年前资源退化与人地关系演变[J]. 地理科学,2001,14(1):30-35.]
    [20] Pan J H. Evolution of Pedogenetic Characteristics of the Earth-Cumuli-Orthic Anthrosols[D]. Nanjing:Institute of Soil Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences,2008.[潘继花. 土垫旱耕人为土发生特性的演变[D]. 南京:中国科学院南京土壤研究所,2008.]
    [21] Pan J H,Zhang G L. Migration and enrichment of some trace elements in earth-cumuli-orthic anthrosols[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2009,46(6):982-990.[潘继花,张甘霖. 土垫旱耕人为土中某些痕量元素的迁移富集特征及其成因[J]. 土壤学报,2009,46(6):982-990.]
    [22] Chang Q R,Yan X,Lei M,et al. Discussion on Lou Soil position in soil classification[J]. Journal of Northwest Sci-tech University of Agriculture and Forest(Natural Science),2001,29(3):48-52.[常庆瑞,阎湘,雷梅,等. 关于塿土分类地位的讨论[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2001,29(3):48-52.]
    [23] Shaanxi Agricultural Survey and Design Institute. Agricultural soil in Shaanxi Province[M]. Xi'an:Shaanxi Science and Technology Press,1982.[陕西省农业勘察设计院. 陕西农业土壤[M]. 西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1982.]
    [24] Soil Survey Office of Shaanxi Province. Shaanxi soil[M]. Beijing:Science Press,1992.[陕西省土壤普查办公室. 陕西土壤[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1992.]
    [25] Qi Y B,Chang Q R,Huang Y,et al. Review on genetic characteristics and classification of Lou Soil in Guanzhong area[J]. Soils,2019,51(2):211-216.[齐雁冰,常庆瑞,黄洋,等. 关中塿土发生特性与分类研究进展[J]. 土壤,2019,51(2):211-216.]
    [26] Jia H Y,Yong S P,Tian J Y,et al. Preliminary study on diagnostic characteristics of Lou Soils[M]//Editor Board of Serious Research Book on Chinese Soil Taxonomy. Progress in Chinese Soil Taxonomy. Beijing:Science Press,1993:311-316.[贾恒义,雍绍萍,田积莹,等. 塿土的诊断特性刍议[M]//《中国土壤系统分类研究丛书》编委会.中国土壤系统分类进展. 北京:科学出版社,1993:311-316.]
    [27] Tian J Y,Yong S P,Jia H Y. Approaching on profile pattern and diagnostic horizons of Lou Soil[M]//Editor Board of Serious Research Book on Chinese Soil Taxonomy. Discussion on Chinese Soil Taxonomy. Beijing:Science Press,1994:153-157.[田积莹,雍绍萍,贾恒义. 塿土土体构型及其诊断特性的探讨[M]//《中国土壤系统分类研究丛书》编委会. 中国土壤系统分类新论. 北京:科学出版社,1994:153-157.]
    [28] Shi C H,Gong Z T. Diagnostic horizon and diagnostic characteristic of Lou Soil[M]//Editor Board of Serious Research Book on Chinese Soil Taxonomy. Discussion on Chinese Soil Taxonomy. Beijing:Science Press,1994:158-162.[史成华,龚子同. 塿土的诊断层和诊断特性[M]//《中国土壤系统分类研究丛书》编委会//中国土壤系统分类新论. 北京:科学出版社,1994:158-162.]
    [29] Chinese Soil Taxonomy Research Group,Institute of Soil Science,Academy Sciences,Cooperative Research Group on Chinese Soil Taxonomy. Chinese Soil Taxonomy[M](1st proposal). Beijing:Science Press,1991.[中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤系统分类课题,中国土壤系统分类课题研究协作组. 中国土壤系统分类(首次方案)[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1991.]
    [30] Chinese Soil Taxonomy Research Group,Institute of Soil Science,Academia Sinica. Chinese Soil Taxonomy(1st draft)[J]. Soils,1985,17(6):290-318.[中国科学院南京土壤研究所分类课题组.中国土壤系统分类初拟[J]. 土壤,1985,17(6):290-318.]
    [31] Chinese Soil Taxonomy Research Group,Institute of Soil Science,Academia Sinica. Chinese Soil Taxonomy(2nd draft)[J]. Progress in Soil Science(Special issue of Soil Taxonomy),1987,23(4):69-104.[中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤分类课题组. 中国土壤系统分类(二稿)[J]. 土壤学进展(土壤系统分类研讨会特刊),1987,23(4):69-104.]
    [32] Yan X,Chang Q R,Pan J P. Classification of Lou soil in Chinese soil taxonomy in Guanzhong region[J]. Soils,2004,36(3):318-322,330.[闫湘,常庆瑞,潘靖平. 陕西关中地区塿土在系统分类中的归属[J]. 土壤,2004,36(3):318-322,330.]
    [33] Yan X,Chang Q R,Wang X Q,et al. Basic soil categories of Earth-Cumulic Orthic Anthrosols area in Guanzhong,Shaanxi Province[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2005,42(4):537-544.[闫湘,常庆瑞,王晓强,等. 陕西关中土垫旱耕人为土样区的基层分类研究[J]. 土壤学报,2005,42(4):537-544.]
    [34] Li D C,Zhang G L. On difficulties and countermeasures in describing soil series in Chinese Soil Taxonomy[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2016,53(6):1563-1567.[李德成,张甘霖. 中国土壤系统分类土系描述的难点与对策[J]. 土壤学报,2016,53(6):1563-1567.]
    [35] Zhang G L,Li D C. Manual of field soil description and sampling[M]. Beijing:Science Press,2017.[张甘霖,李德成. 野外土壤描述与采样手册[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2017.]
    [36] Zhang G L,Gong Z T. Soil survey and laboratory methods[M]. Beijing:Science Press,2012.[张甘霖,龚子同. 土壤调查实验室分析方法[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2012.]
    [37] Liu J J,Qi Y B,Chen Y,et al. Assessment of soil moisture and temperature regime classes in Shaanxi Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2017,48(2):335-342.[刘姣姣,齐雁冰,陈洋,等. 陕西省土壤温度和水分状况估算[J].土壤通报,2017,48(2):335-342.]
    [38] Zhang G L,Wang Q B,Zhang F R,et al. Criteria for establishment of soil family and soil series in Chinese Soil Taxonomy[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2013,50(4):826-834.[张甘霖,王秋兵,张凤荣,等. 中国土壤系统分类土族和土系划分标准[J]. 土壤学报,2013,50(4):826-834.]
    [39] Du G H,Zhang G L,Luo G B. Soil series division in Huaibei plain sample area. Soils,1999,31(2):70-76.[杜国华,张甘霖,骆国保. 淮北平原样区的土系划分.土壤,1999,31(2):70-76.]
    [40] Zhang X L,Yu J B. Soil species in Shaanxi. Xi'an:Shaanxi Science and Technology Press,1993.[张相麟,喻建波. 陕西土种志. 西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1993.]
    [41] Shaanxi Agricultural Zoning Office,Northwest Institute of Soil and Water Conservation,Chinese Academy of Sciences. Wugong soil[M]. Xian:Shaanxi Science and Technology Press,1987.[陕西省农业区划办公室,中国科学院西北水土保持研究所. 武功土壤[M]. 西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1987.]
    [42] Soil Survey Office of Baoji City,Shaanxi Province. Baoji soil[M]. Xian:Shaanxi Science and Technology Press,1989.[陕西省宝鸡市土壤普查办公室. 宝鸡土壤[M]. 西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1989.]
    [43] Mei C H,et al. Weinan soil[M]. Yangling,Shaanxi:Tianze Press,1990.[梅畅和,等. 渭南土壤[M]. 陕西杨陵:天则出版社,1990.]
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

吴娟,齐雁冰,常庆瑞,刘梦云,白丽敏.关中地区塿土系统分类归属及代表土系建立[J].土壤学报,2021,58(2):357-371. DOI:10.11766/trxb201906240325 WU Juan, QI Yanbing, CHANG Qingrui, LIU Mengyun, BAI Limin. Attribution of Lou Soil in Chinese Soil Taxonomy and Establishment of Representative Soil Series in Guanzhong Area[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2021,58(2):357-371.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1530
  • 下载次数: 3992
  • HTML阅读次数: 3956
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-24
  • 最后修改日期:2019-09-07
  • 录用日期:2019-12-13
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-10-30
  • 出版日期: 2021-03-11
文章二维码