西苕溪流域主要经济林土壤磷素流失风险研究
作者:
基金项目:

国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2014ZX07101-012)资助


Potential Risk of Phosphorus Loss from Main Non-Wood Forest Soils in Xitiaoxi Watershed
Author:
Fund Project:

Supported by the Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment(No.2014ZX07101-012)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [34]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    经济林土壤磷素积累与潜在流失风险的研究对流域内磷素管理和面源污染控制十分必要。通过采样调查和室内分析研究了西苕溪流域主要经济林土壤测试磷的状况及磷素流失的潜在风险,调查采集了西苕溪流域安吉段主要经济林(毛竹、白茶、板栗)土壤样品105个,探讨了土壤理化性质对土壤磷素流失的影响以及土壤有效磷的控制阈值。结果表明,土壤水溶性磷(WEP)与土壤有机碳(SOC)、全磷(TP)呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),模拟酸雨浸提磷(SARP)也与土壤SOC、TP呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),土壤WEP、SARP与pH呈极显著负相关(P<0.01),但决定系数R2分别仅有0.187~0.280,影响相对较小。土壤WEP、SARP与有效磷(Bray 1-P)的关系可用分段线性回归方程描述(P<0.01),R2分别可达0.992、0.991,估算得出,与WEP、SARP相对应的土壤Bray 1-P的阈值分别为93.63、87.68 mg·kg-1,后者较前者降低了5.95 mg·kg-1。此外,土壤Bray 1-P含量超过40 mg·kg-1、低于5 mg·kg-1的样品占比分别可达17.14%、38.01%,缺磷与磷过度积累现象并存。土壤磷素的流失风险主要受土壤Bray 1-P、TP、SOC、pH等因素的影响,其中Bray 1-P是最重要的影响因子。酸雨会加大土壤磷素流失的潜在风险,作为酸雨频发区域的西苕溪流域,土壤有效磷水平的限制应更为严格。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] Studies on accumulation and potential loss risk of soil phosphorus in non-wood forest soils are essential to management of soil phosphorus and control of non-point source P pollution in watersheds. So a research project was carried out in the Xitiaoxi watershed.[Method] In the project, a total of 105 soil samples were collected in the main non-wood forests, such as moso bamboo (Phyllostachys heterocycla (Carr.) Mitford cv. Pubescens Mazel ex H.de leh.), white tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Ktze.), chestnut (Castanea mollissima Bl.) in the watershed for lab analysis of concentrations of water-extractable phosphorus (WEP) and simulated-acid-rain-extractable phosphorus (SARP) and some main soil physico-chemical properties such as total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), total potassium (TK), alkalyzable nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (Bray 1-P), readily available potassium (AK), pH, soil organic carbon (SOC). Acid rain set at 4.75 in pH was simulated and prepared with sulphate acid and nitrate acid. Correlation analysis and regression analysis was performed of the obtained data to determine influences of soil physico-chemical properties on the risk of phosphorus runoff loss and threshold of soil available phosphorus.[Result] In the survey area, soil TP content varied in the range of 0.22-0.73 g·kg-1 (0.42 g·kg-1 on average) and Bray 1-P content in the range of 0.93-313.2 mg·kg-1 (30.87 mg·kg-1 on average) with coefficient of variation reaching up to 204.7% and the soil samples over 40 mg·kg-1 and below 5 mg·kg-1 in Bray-P content accounted for 17.14% and 38.01% of all the analyzed ones, respectively; soil WEP content varied in the range of 0.03-38.15 mg·kg-1 (2.64 mg·kg-1 on average) with coefficient of variation reaching up to 267.5%; and soil SARP content varied in the range of 0.03-42.91 mg·kg-1 (2.86 mg·kg-1 on average) with coefficient of variation reaching up to 268.6%. It was found that soil WEP and SARP were significantly and positively related to soil organic carbon (SOC) and TP (P<0.01), and negatively to soil pH, with determination coefficient (R2), however, being only 0.266, 0.251, 0.280, 0.262, 0.187 and 0.190, respectively, which indicates that they are relatively not much affected by these soil properties. The relationship between WEP, SARP and Bray 1-P could be described by the piecewise linear regression equation, which was y=0.148 3x-8.601, x>93.63;0.056 9x-0.043, x<93.63. for WEP with R2 being 0.992(r=0.996), and y=0.057 1x-0.021 6, x<87.68;0.160-4x 9.079, x>87.68. for SARP with R2 being 0.991 (r=0.995). Hence, the thresholds of soil Bray 1-P was reckoned to be 93.63 and 87.68 mg·kg-1, respectively, based on WEP and SARP and the latter was 5.95 mg·kg-1 lower than the former.[Conclusion] All the findings in the study demonstrate that both the phenomena of phosphorus deficiency and excessive accumulation exist in the non-wood forest soils of Xitiaoxi watershed. Soil Bray 1-P, TP, organic matter and pH are the main factors affecting the potential risk of phosphorus runoff loss and Bray 1-P is the most significant one. Acid rain enhances the potential risk of phosphorus runoff loss. As the studied region is one that suffers from frequent acid rain, the content of soil available phosphorus should be more strictly controlled.

    参考文献
    [1] Zhang Y,Xu Y P,Yu Z H,et al. Environmental flow assessment in Xitiaoxi catchment of the Taihu Basin[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2014,45(10):1193-1198.[张媛,许有鹏,于志慧,等. 太湖西苕溪流域环境流量评价分析[J]. 水利学报,2014,45(10):1193-1198.]
    [2] Jin L M,Zhang Q,Li H P,et al. Characteristics of non-point source N pollution in Xitiaoxi catchment,China[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2011,30(7):1385-1390.[金黎明,张奇,李恒鹏,等. 西苕溪流域非点源氮污染特征[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2011,30(7):1385-1390.]
    [3] Dong D Y,Zhang B,Zhang C Q,et al. Assessment on soil nutrients loss of forestland in Anji County of the Taihu basin[J]. Resources Science,2011,33(8):1608-1612.[董敦义,张彪,张灿强,等. 太湖流域安吉县林地养分流失评估[J]. 资源科学,2011,33(8):1608-1612.]
    [4] Ying J Y,Ruan Y F,Wu Q F,et al. Accumulation and runoff loss potential risk of soil phosphorus in agricultural land near Qiantang River[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment,2019,36(1):26-32.[应金耀,阮弋飞,邬奇峰,等. 钱塘江附近农田土壤磷的积累及其流失的潜在风险[J]. 农业资源与环境学报,2019,36(1):26-32.]
    [5] Heckrath G,Brookes P C,Poulton P R,et al. Phosphorus leaching from soils containing different phosphorus concentrations in the broadbalk experiment[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality,1995,24(5):904-910.
    [6] Hesketh N,Brookes P C. Development of an indicator for risk of phosphorus leaching[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality,2000,29(1):105-110.
    [7] Zhao X R,Zhong X Y,Bao H J,et al. Relating soil P concentrations at which P movement occurs to soil properties in Chinese agricultural soils[J]. Geoderma,2007,142(3/4):237-244.
    [8] Jalali M,Jalali M. Assessment risk of phosphorus leaching from calcareous soils using soil test phosphorus[J]. Chemosphere,2017,171:106-117.
    [9] Xi B,Zhai L M,Liu J,et al. Long-term phosphorus accumulation and agronomic and environmental critical phosphorus levels in Haplic Luvisol soil,Northern China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2016,15(1):200-208.
    [10] Khan A,Lu G Y,Ayaz M,et al. Phosphorus efficiency,soil phosphorus dynamics and critical phosphorus level under long-term fertilization for single and double cropping systems[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment,2018,256:1-11.
    [11] Shen Y,Duan Y H,Huang S M,et al. Response of CaCl2-P to phosphorus fertilization and leaching risk in fluvo-aquic soils[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers,2018,24(6):1689-1696.[申艳,段英华,黄绍敏,等. 潮土CaCl2-P含量对磷肥施用的响应及其淋失风险分析[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2018,24(6):1689-1696.]
    [12] Zhang H L. Study on the present situation,causes and control measures of acid rain in Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Green Science and Technology,2015(5):191-192.[张慧玲. 浙江省酸雨现状、成因及防治对策研究[J]. 绿色科技,2015(5):191-192.]
    [13] Liu X Y,An W L,Jin Q,et al. Effects of simulated acid rain on soil carbon,nitrogen,and phosphorus contents and ecological stoichiometry characteristics of paddy field in Fuzhou plain[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,33(3):199-206.[刘旭阳,安婉丽,金强,等. 模拟酸雨对福州平原水稻田土壤碳、氮、磷含量及其生态化学计量学特征影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2019,33(3):199-206.]
    [14] Jalali M,Naderi E. The impact of acid rain on phosphorus leaching from a sandy loam calcareous soil of western Iran[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences,2012,66(1):311-317.
    [15] Liang X Q,Liu J,Chen Y X,et al. Effect of pH on the release of soil colloidal phosphorus[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments,2010,10(8):1548-1556.
    [16] Liao X L,Nair V D,Canion A,et al. Subsurface transport and potential risk of phosphorus to groundwater across different land uses in a Karst springs basin,Florida,USA[J]. Geoderma,2019,338:97-106.
    [17] LU R K. Analytical methods for soil and agro-chemistry. Beijing:China Agricultural Science and Technology Press,2000.[鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2000.]
    [18] Cui H B,Zhang S W,Li R Y,et al. Leaching of Cu,Cd,Pb,and phosphorus and their availability in the phosphate-amended contaminated soils under simulated acid rain[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2017,24(26):21128-21137.
    [19] Wang J W,Wang Y L,Yao Y,et al. Effects of long-term fertilization on phosphorus retention and release of soil aggregates in upland red soils[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2017,54(5):1240-1250.[王经纬,王艳玲,姚怡,等. 长期施肥对旱地红壤团聚体磷素固持与释放能力的影响[J]. 土壤学报,2017,54(5):1240-1250.]
    [20] Lou H Z,Yang S T,Zhao C S,et al. Detecting and analyzing soil phosphorus loss associated with critical source areas using a remote sensing approach[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2016,573:397-408.
    [21] Gong J,Ma Y H,Hu H X,et al. Research advances on environmental indicator of soil phosphorus in farmland[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2016,32(2):112-117.[龚娟,马友华,胡宏祥,等. 农田土壤磷的环境指标研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报,2016,32(2):112-117.]
    [22] Huang M,Liang R X,Yin W W,et al. Effects of typical greenhouse factors on labile phosphorus in soil[J]. China Environmental Science,2018,38(5):1818-1825.[黄敏,梁荣祥,尹维文,等. 典型设施环境条件对土壤活性磷变化的影响[J]. 中国环境科学,2018,38(5):1818-1825.]
    [23] Huang L D,Wang H Y,Li Y X,et al. Spatial distribution and risk assessment of phosphorus loss potential in urban–suburban soil of Lishui,China[J]. Catena,2013,100:42-49.
    [24] Heredia O S,Fernández Cirelli A. Environmental risks of increasing phosphorus addition in relation to soil sorption capacity[J]. Geoderma,2007,137(3/4):426-431.
    [25] Meng C,Liu H Y,Wang Y,et al. Response of regional agricultural soil phosphorus status to net anthropogenic phosphorus input(NAPI)determined by soil pH value and organic matter content in subtropical China[J]. Chemosphere,2018,200:487-494.
    [26] Xia W J,Ji J H,Liu J,et al. Effect of long-term fertilization on soil phosphorus characteristics and loss risk of red soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2018,26(12):1876-1886.[夏文建,冀建华,刘佳,等. 长期不同施肥红壤磷素特征和流失风险研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2018,26(12):1876-1886.]
    [27] Yan Z J,Chen S,Dari B,et al. Phosphorus transformation response to soil properties changes induced by manure application in a calcareous soil[J]. Geoderma,2018,322:163-171.
    [28] Fortune S,Lu J,Addiscott T M,et al. Assessment of phosphorus leaching losses from arable land[J]. Plant and Soil,2005,269(1/2):99-108.
    [29] Chu B J,Yu G H,Liu F F,et al. Characterization of mineral-organic complex in soil microaggregates with synchrotron radiation infrared micro-imaging method[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2017,54(6):1451-1458.[褚冰杰,余光辉,刘飞飞,等. 土壤微团聚体中矿物-有机复合体特征[J]. 土壤学报,2017,54(6):1451-1458.]
    [30] Wu X B. The variation characteristics and cause analysis of acid rain in Xianning city[J]. Environmental Science and Technology,2014,37(S1):82-86.[吴新碧. 咸宁市酸雨变化特征及其成因分析[J]. 环境科学与技术,2014,37(S1):82-86.]
    [31] Yuan Y Z,Guo Y,Zhang Y C,et al. Impacts of landscape patterns on farmland soil acidification in typical subtropical small watersheds of China[J]. Soils,2019,51(1):90-99.[袁宇志,郭颖,张育灿,等. 亚热带典型小流域景观格局对耕地土壤酸化的影响[J]. 土壤,2019,51(1):90-99.]
    [32] Dayton E A,Whitacre S D,Holloman C H. Demonstrating the relationship between soil phosphorus measures and phosphorus solubility:Implications for Ohio phosphorus risk assessment tools[J]. Journal of Great Lakes Research,2014,40(3):473-478.
    [33] Xu H Q,Zhang J E,Yu J Y,et al. Effects of simulated acid rain on leaching of phosphorus,Ca2+,Al3+ and Fe2+ from lateritic red soils[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science,2011,17(5):1172-1178.[徐华勤,章家恩,余家瑜,等. 模拟酸雨对赤红壤磷素及Ca2+、Al3+、Fe2+淋失特征的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2011,17(5):1172-1178.]
    [34] Li Z,Wang H,Xu H Q,et al. Effect of simulated acid rain on the dynamics of phosphorus in paddy soil[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization,2015,36(3):477-481.[李泽,王华,徐华勤,等. 模拟酸雨对水稻土磷素动态变化的影响[J]. 农业现代化研究,2015,36(3):477-481.]
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王肖君,王季丰,侯 琼,冷明珠,倪吾钟.西苕溪流域主要经济林土壤磷素流失风险研究[J].土壤学报,2021,58(2):487-494. DOI:10.11766/trxb201908220433 WANG Xiaojun, WANG Jifeng, HOU Qiong, LENG Mingzhu, NI Wuzhong. Potential Risk of Phosphorus Loss from Main Non-Wood Forest Soils in Xitiaoxi Watershed[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2021,58(2):487-494.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-22
  • 最后修改日期:2019-12-19
  • 录用日期:2020-05-08
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-12-10
  • 出版日期: 2021-03-11
文章二维码