首页 > 过刊浏览>2022年第59卷第1期 >38-53. DOI:10.11766/trxb202010120569
PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒
国内外污染场地风险管控技术体系与模式研究进展
作者:
中图分类号:

X53

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目（2020YFC1807500）资助


Advancement in Researches on Technical Systems and Modes for Risk Management and Control of Contaminated Sites at Home and Aborad
Author:
Fund Project:

the National Key R&D Program of China（2020YFC1807500）

  • 摘要
    • | |
  • 访问统计
    • |
  • 参考文献 [79]
    • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
    • |
  • 引证文献
    • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以风险管理为基本原则的污染场地可持续治理修复及安全利用已成为全球范围内一个紧迫的环境和发展问题。为促进快速、经济、有效的风险管控技术在我国土壤污染防治初期阶段的广阔应用，本文在明确污染场地风险管控广义和狭义内涵属性的基础上，系统阐述了工程控制、制度控制和监测自然衰减等狭义风险管控技术的技术原理、工程应用和适用条件，剖析英美等发达国家风险管控体系并结合我国土壤环境管理实际建立技术体系和政策体系支撑下的风险管控模式，最后针对我国污染场地风险管理基础薄弱、风险管控体系不健全和风险管控技术支撑不足等问题，提出基于绿色可持续理念和全生命周期管理理论的“防、控、治、管”四位一体的污染场地风险管控总体布局，对于推动我国风险管控技术应用和提高场地风险管理水平具有重要的现实意义。

    Abstract:

    With risk management as basic principle, sustainable remediation and safe utilization of contaminated sites has become an urgent environmental and developmental issue worldwide. To promote the application of rapid, economical and effective risk management and control technologies at the early stage of the soil pollution prevention and control drive in China, while specifying attributes of the broad and narrow connotations of risk management and control of contaminated sites, the paper elaborated systematically the technical theory, engineering implementation and applicable conditions of the risk management technologies in narrow connotation, including engineering control, institutional control and monitored natural attenuation, analyzed the risk management and control systems in developed countries, with reference to the risk management and control mode supported by the technical system and policy system established on the reality of the soil environmental management in China. In the end, aiming at the problems of weak foundation, unsound system and insufficient technical support of the risk management and control system in China, the authors put forth an overall layout of "prevention-control-remediation-management" for risk management and control of contaminated sites in consistence with the idea of green sustainability and the theory of life cycle management, which is expected to be of great practical significance to promotion of application of the technology and improvement of the risk management level.

    参考文献
    [1] Xie Y F, Cao Y Z, Zhang D D, et al. Engineering control technologies and its application in the risk management for contaminated sites[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2012, 2(1):51-59.[谢云峰, 曹云者, 张大定, 等. 污染场地环境风险的工程控制技术及其应用[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2012, 2(1):51-59.]
    [2] Pizzol L, Zabeo A, Critto A, et al. Risk-based prioritization methodology for the classification of groundwater pollution sources[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 506/507:505-517.
    [3] UK EA. Dealing with contaminated land in England:progress from April 2000 to December 2013 with Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990[R]. Bristol:The Environment Agency in England and Wales, 2016.
    [4] US EPA. Superfund remedy report[R]. 15th ed. Washington D C:Office of Land and Emergency Management, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2017.
    [5] Yuan K S. Brownfield redevelopment risk control legal regulation research in China[D]. Chongqing:Southwest University of Political Science and Law, 2016.[苑克帅. 我国污染场地再开发风险管控法律规制研究[D]. 重庆:西南政法大学, 2016.]
    [6] Chang C Y, Dong M G, Deng Y R, et al. Thoughts on and construction of a risk management and control system for contaminated sites in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area[J]. Environmental Science, 2019, 40(12):5570-5580.[常春英, 董敏刚, 邓一荣, 等. 粤港澳大湾区污染场地土壤风险管控制度体系建设与思考[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(12):5570-5580.]
    [7] Lu W T. Research on remediation of contaminated sites based on risk management and control[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 22(16):65-67.[陆文婷. 基于风险管控思路的污染场地修复研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2016, 22(16):65-67.]
    [8] Chen X H, Shen G X, Guo C X, et al. International experience of risk management of reclaimed farmland from low-efficiency industrial land and its enlightenment[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 2019, 41(9):1120-1124.[陈小华, 沈根祥, 郭春霞, 等. 城市低效工业用地复垦农用风险管控的国际经验及启示[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2019, 41(9):1120-1124.]
    [9] Zhang Z Y. Normative analysis and change path of soil risk control system[J]. Journal of North China Electric Power University:Social Sciences, 2019(5):1-8.[张真源. 土壤污染风险管控制度的规范分析与完善路径[J]. 华北电力大学学报:社会科学版, 2019(5):1-8.]
    [10] Wang X H. Intelligent identification and precise risk control of site pollution driven by big data[J]. Environmental Protection, 2019, 47(13):14-16.[王夏晖. 大数据:场地污染智能识别与风险精准管控驱动力[J]. 环境保护, 2019, 47(13):14-16.]
    [11] Bardos R P, Bone B D, Boyle R, et al. The rationale for simple approaches for sustainability assessment and management in contaminated land practice[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 563/564:755-768.
    [12] Wang H. Method of urban brownfield regulatory planning based on environmental risk management[D]. Guangzhou:Guangdong University of Technology, 2018.[王慧. 基于环境风险管控的城市棕地控规编制方法研究[D]. 广州:广东工业大学, 2018.]
    [13] ASTM International. Standard guide for greener cleanups (ASTM E2893-16e1). West Conshohocken:American Society for Testing Materials, 2016.
    [14] Deeb R, Hawley E, Kell L, et al. Assessing alternative endpoints for groundwater remediation at contaminated sites[R]. Italy:Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2011.
    [15] UK EA. Dealing with contaminated land in England and Wales:A review of progress from 2000-2007 with Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act[R]. Bristol:The Environment Agency in England and Wales, 2009.
    [16] Tang F, Hu H Q, Liu Y H, et al. Types of contaminated sites and risk control techniques[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 36(S2):195-202.[汤帆, 胡红青, 刘永红, 等. 污染场地类型及其风险控制技术[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2013, 36(S2):195-202.]
    [17] Li Z T, Wang X H, Gao Y X, et al. Countermeasure study of environmental management and control of contaminated sites[J]. Environmental Protection Science, 2016, 42(4):40-42.[李志涛, 王夏晖, 高彦鑫, 等. 污染地块环境风险管控对策研究[J]. 环境保护科学, 2016, 42(4):40-42.]
    [18] Li Y Z, Dong J, Liu S Y, et al. Prospect and research of soil pollution control based on risk management[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2017, 26(6):1075-1084.[李云祯, 董荐, 刘姝媛, 等. 基于风险管控思路的土壤污染防治研究与展望[J]. 生态环境学报, 2017, 26(6):1075-1084.]
    [19] US EPA. Institutional controls:A site manager's guide to identifying, evaluating and selecting institutional controls at Superfund and RCRA Corrective Action Cleanups[R]. Washington D C:Office of Land and Emergency Management, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2000.
    [20] US EPA. Monitored natural attenuation:USEPA research program-an EPA science advisory board review[R]. Washington D C:Office of the Administrator Science Advisory Board, 2001.
    [21] US EPA. Institutional controls:A guide to planning, implementing, maintaining, and enforcing Institutional Controls at contaminated sites[R]. Washington D C:Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2012.
    [22] US EPA. Superfund remedy report[R]. 14th ed. Washington D C:Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2013.
    [23] US EPA. Strategy to ensure Institutional Control implementation at Superfund Sites[EB/OL]. 2004[2020-09-10]. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/icstrategy.pdf.
    [24] US EPA. Technical guidance for RCRA/CERCLA final covers (Draft)[R]. Washington D C:Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2004.
    [25] Chien C C, Inyang H I, Everett L G. Barrier systems for environmental contaminant containment and treatment[M]. Florida:CRC Press, 2005.
    [26] US EPA. Permeable reactive barrier technologies for contaminant remediation[R]. Washington D C:Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1998.
    [27] Chen J. Risk assessment and remediation program discussion of a typical fluoride contaminated site[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University, 2016.[陈静. 某氟化物污染场地再利用风险评估及修复方案探讨[D]. 南京:南京大学, 2016.]
    [28] Chen S Y, Wang F, Wang W F, et al. Research and application of engineering control in contaminated sites[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2014, 32(5):146-149, 137.[陈素云, 王峰, 王文峰, 等. 污染场地工程控制技术应用研究[J]. 环境工程, 2014, 32(5):146-149, 137.]
    [29] Zheng Y, Yu Z, Hu J C, et al. Restoration and risk control of a retired industrial site in Zhejiang Province[J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2019, 46(10):115-117, 135.[郑阳, 余湛, 胡佳晨, 等. 浙江省某退役工业场地修复治理及风险管控工程实例[J]. 广东化工, 2019, 46(10):115-117, 135.]
    [30] Ma Y, Dong B B, Xie Y F, et al. Experience of institutional controls in American contaminated sites and its enlightenment to China[J]. Environmental Protection, 2016, 44(Z1):98-101.[马妍, 董彬彬, 谢云峰, 等. 美国污染场地制度控制经验及实践应用[J]. 环境保护, 2016, 44(Z1):98-101.]
    [31] Shen K, Song Y, Zhao K H. Contaminated site remediation technology and risk management[J]. Environment and Sustainable Development, 2011, 36(2):1-5.[申坤, 宋云, 赵可卉. 污染场地修复技术及风险管理[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2011, 36(2):1-5.]
    [32] Zhang H, Jiang P, Teng J Q, et al. Analysis on institutional control of polluted sites in America and its revelation of China[J]. Environmental Protection Science, 2012, 38(4):49-52.[张华, 蒋鹏, 滕加泉, 等. 美国污染场地的制度控制分析及对我国的启示[J]. 环境保护科学, 2012, 38(4):49-52.]
    [33] Li Y J, Wang S J, Zhang M, et al. Research progress of monitored natural attenuation remediation technology for soil and groundwater pollution[J]. China Environmental Science, 2018, 38(3):1185-1193.[李元杰, 王森杰, 张敏, 等. 土壤和地下水污染的监控自然衰减修复技术研究进展[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018, 38(3):1185-1193.]
    [34] Chen R R. Application investigation of Monitored Natural Attenuation technology on chlorinated organic compounds contaminated sites[D]. Nanjing:Southeast University, 2016.[陈然然. 监控自然衰减技术在氯代有机物污染场地的应用探究[D]. 南京:东南大学, 2016.]
    [35] Jiao X. Comment on monitored natural attenuation of organic contaminants in soil and groundwater[J]. Shanghai Land and Resources, 2011, 32(2):30-35.[焦珣. 地下水土有机污染MNA修复研究综述[J]. 上海国土资源, 2011, 32(2):30-35.]
    [36] NRC (National Research Council). Natural attenuation for groundwater remediation[M]. Washington D C:National Academies Press, 2000.
    [37]
    [37] US EPA. Monitored Natural Attenuation of MTBE as a risk management option at leaking underground storage tank sites[R]. Washington D C:Office of Research and Development, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2005.
    [38] Zhu R L. Natural Attenuation of 1, 1, 1-trichloroethane in shallow groundwater at a contaminated site in Shanghai, China[D]. Shanghai:East China University of Science and Technology, 2014.[朱瑞利. 上海某污染场地地下水中三氯乙烷的自然衰减机制研究[D]. 上海:华东理工大学, 2014.]
    [39] Yin Y, Dai Z H, Jiang P, et al. Research on the feasibility assessment programs of Monitored Natural Attenuation in Contaminated Aquifers of Volatile Organic Contaminants contaminated sites[J]. Jiangxi Chemical Industry, 2013(3):28-31.[尹勇, 戴中华, 蒋鹏, 等. VOCs污染场地地下水监测式自然衰减法可行性评估程序研究[J]. 江西化工, 2013(3):28-31.]
    [40] Jia H, Wu X F, Hu L M, et al. Research of the natural attenuation capacity of oil pollutants based on in-situ experiment[J]. Environmental Science, 2011, 32(12):3699-3703.[贾慧, 武晓峰, 胡黎明, 等. 基于现场试验的石油类污染物自然衰减能力研究[J]. 环境科学, 2011, 32(12):3699-3703.]
    [41] Yan K, Lou J, Wang H Z, et al. Research of contaminated sites based on knowledge graph analysis and its development trend[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2021,[严康, 楼骏, 汪海珍, 等. 基于知识图谱分析的污染场地研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 土壤学报, 2021.]
    [42] Luo Y M. Current research and development in soil remediation technologies[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2009, 21(2/3):558-565.[骆永明. 污染土壤修复技术研究现状与趋势[J]. 化学进展, 2009, 21(Z1):558-565.]
    [43] Harclerode M A, MacBeth T W, Miller M E, et al. Early decision framework for integrating sustainable risk management for complex remediation sites:Drivers, barriers, and performance metrics[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 184:57-66.
    [44] NAS (National Academy of Sciences). Risk assessment in the federal government:Managing the process[M]. Washington D C:National Academies Press, 1983.
    [45] US EPA. Guidelines for mutagenicity risk assessment[R]. Washington D C:Risk Assessment Forum, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1986.
    [46] US EPA. Guidelines for exposure assessment[R]. Washington D C:Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1992.
    [47] US EPA. Exposure factors handbook[R]. Washington D C:Risk Assessment Forum, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1997.
    [48] US EPA. Guidelines for neurotoxicity risk assessment[R]. Washington D C:Risk Assessment Forum, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1998.
    [49] US EPA. Risk assessment guidance for superfund:Volume I:Human health evaluation manual (Part E, Supplemental guidance for dermal risk assessment)[R]. Washington D C:Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2004.
    [50] US EPA. Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment[R]. Washington D C:Risk Assessment Forum, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2005.
    [51] UK EA. Compilation of data for priority organic pollutants for derivation of soil guideline values[R]. Bristol:The Environment Agency in England and Wales, 2008.
    [52] UK EA. Human health toxicological assessment of contaminants in soil[R]. Bristol:The Environment Agency in England and Wales, 2009.
    [53] UK EA. Updated technical background to the CLEA model[R]. Bristol:The Environment Agency in England and Wales, 2009.
    [54] Chen M F, Han L, Luo F. Soil and groundwater risk assessment methodologies for contaminated sites[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2017.[陈梦舫, 韩璐, 罗飞. 污染场地土壤与地下水风险评估方法学[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2017.]
    [55] Zhou Y Y, Jiang L, Zhang C Y, et al. Development of risk assessment of contaminated sites in China[J]. Environmental Protection, 2019, 47(8):34-38.[周友亚, 姜林, 张超艳, 等. 我国污染场地风险评估发展历程概述[J]. 环境保护, 2019, 47(8):34-38.]
    [56] Luo H K, Yan Q Y, Zhang S W, et al. Determination of remediation goal in an arsenic contaminated site in Pearl River Delta[J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2017, 44(14):185-187.[罗海鲲, 严青云, 章生卫, 等. 珠三角典型砷污染场地修复目标值的确定[J]. 广东化工, 2017, 44(14):185-187.]
    [57] Luo Y M, Teng Y. Research progresses and prospects on soil pollution and remediation in China[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2020, 57(5):1137-1142.[骆永明, 滕应. 中国土壤污染与修复科技研究进展和展望[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(5):1137-1142.]
    [58] Sheng C. Environmental risk assessment and repair system for contaminated sites[J]. Environment and Development, 2019, 31(5):35, 229.[盛璀. 污染场地环境风险评价与修复体系研究[J]. 环境与发展, 2019, 31(5):35, 229.]
    [59] Wang J M, Wen Q Q, Chen G D. Health risk evaluation and remediation strategies for an abandoned pesticide factory site contaminated by atrazine[J]. Journal of Environmental Management College of China, 2019, 29(3):85-88.[王金梅, 温其谦, 陈国栋. 典型农药场地阿特拉津污染风险评价与修复[J]. 中国环境管理干部学院学报, 2019, 29(3):85-88.]
    [60] Wang J, Feng C H, Zeng Q J, et al. Risk assessment of environmental pollution and human health in hong'ao construction and demolition waste landfill in Shenzhen[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2019, 42(7):213-218.[王婧, 冯春华, 曾庆军, 等. 深圳红坳渣土受纳场污染及人体健康风险评价[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2019, 42(7):213-218.]
    [61] Ye J L, Tian L P, Wu W W, et al. Characteristics and health risk assessment of heavy metal pollution in typical mining area in zhehai, Huize County, Yunnan Province[J]. The Administration and Technique of Environmental Monitoring, 2019, 31(3):36-40.[叶金利, 田路萍, 吴文卫, 等. 云南会泽者海镇典型矿区场地重金属污染特征及健康风险评价[J]. 环境监测管理与技术, 2019, 31(3):36-40.]
    [62] Zhang C, Qin R L. The application of screening values and standards for soil and groundwater in contaminated site[J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2018, 45(6):147-148, 119.[张驰, 秦榕璘. 污染场地土壤与地下水筛选值及标准应用[J]. 广东化工, 2018, 45(6):147-148, 119.]
    [63] Cao P Q, Fujimori T, Juhasz A, et al. Bioaccessibility and human health risk assessment of metal(loid) s in soil from an e-waste open burning site in Agbogbloshie, Accra, Ghana[J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 240:124909.
    [64] Hou D Y, Qi S Q, Zhao B, et al. Incorporating life cycle assessment with health risk assessment to select the ‘greenest' cleanup level for Pb contaminated soil[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 162:1157-1168.
    [65] Xiao X, Zhang J X, Wang H, et al. Distribution and health risk assessment of potentially toxic elements in soils around coal industrial areas:A global meta-analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 713:135292.
    [66] Zhang R H, Han D, Jiang L, et al. Derivation of site-specific remediation goals by incorporating the bioaccessibility of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with the probabilistic analysis method[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 384:121239.
    [67] Wang L Q. Health risk assessment of contaminated sites[D]. Bejing:North China Electric Power University, 2019.[王利群. 污染场地健康风险评价[D]. 北京:华北电力大学, 2019.]
    [68] Huysegoms L, Rousseau S, Cappuyns V. Friends or foes? Monetized Life Cycle Assessment and Cost-Benefit Analysis of the site remediation of a former gas plant[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 619/620:258-271.
    [69] Reddy K R, Chetri J K, Kiser K. Quantitative Sustainability Assessment of Various Remediation Alternatives for Contaminated Lake Sediments:Case Study[J]. Sustainability:The Journal of Record, 2018, 11(6):307-321.
    [70] Søndergaard G L, Binning P J, Bondgaard M, et al. Multi-criteria assessment tool for sustainability appraisal of remediation alternatives for a contaminated site[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2018, 18(11):3334-3348.
    [71] Song Y N, Hou D, Zhang J L, et al. Environmental and socio-economic sustainability appraisal of contaminated land remediation strategies:A case study at a mega-site in China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 610/611:391-401.
    [72] Tao H, Liao X Y, Yan X L, et al. Application of multiple attributes decision analysis to selection of soil remediation technologies for contaminated sites[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(8):4850-4860.[陶欢, 廖晓勇, 阎秀兰, 等. 应用多属性决策分析法筛选污染场地土壤修复技术[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(8):4850-4860.]
    [73] Wu M. Remediation technique screening on industrial soil-polluted site-A case study of industrial soil-polluted site in Quanzhou City of Fujian Province[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 38(6):195-199.[吴敏. 工业污染场地修复技术的筛选——以福建省泉州市某工业污染场地为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018, 38(6):195-199.]
    [74] Zhang Q, Jiang D, Gu Q B, et al. Selection of remediation techniques for contaminated sites using AHP and TOPSIS[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2012, 49(6):1088-1094.[张倩, 蒋栋, 谷庆宝, 等. 基于AHP和TOPSIS的污染场地修复技术筛选方法研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2012, 49(6):1088-1094.]
    [75] Huysegoms L, Cappuyns V. Critical review of decision support tools for sustainability assessment of site remediation options[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 196:278-296.
    [76] Onwubuya K, Cundy A, Puschenreiter M, et al. Developing decision support tools for the selection of "gentle" remediation approaches[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2009, 407(24):6132-6142.
    [77] Rosén L, Back P E, Söderqvist T, et al. SCORE:A novel multi-criteria decision analysis approach to assessing the sustainability of contaminated land remediation[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 511:621-638.
    [78] Zhang H B, Zhang L B, Li D Q, et al. Research of decision for contaminated site remediation based on DESYRE model[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2012, 2(4):339-348.[张海博, 张林波, 李岱青, 等. 基于DESYRE模型的污染场地修复决策研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2012, 2(4):339-348.]
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

李笑诺,陈卫平,吕斯丹.国内外污染场地风险管控技术体系与模式研究进展[J].土壤学报,2022,59(1):38-53. DOI:10.11766/trxb202010120569 LI Xiaonuo, CHEN Weiping, Lü Sidan. Advancement in Researches on Technical Systems and Modes for Risk Management and Control of Contaminated Sites at Home and Aborad[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2022,59(1):38-53.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1179
  • 下载次数: 3354
  • HTML阅读次数: 5774
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-12
  • 最后修改日期:2020-12-08
  • 录用日期:2021-01-27
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-01-28
  • 出版日期: 2022-01-11
文章二维码
今日访问量：11387 您是第8203771 位访问者
通讯地址：江苏省南京市江宁区麒麟街道创优路298号 邮政编码：211135 电话：025-86881237
网址：http://pedologica.issas.ac.cn/ E-mail：actapedo@issas.ac.cn
版权所有：《土壤学报》编辑部 技术支持：北京勤云科技发展有限公司 ICP:05004320号-1