氮肥减施对红壤旱坡花生地氮素径流和渗漏损失及表观平衡的影响
作者:
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(4176106,42067020)、江西省重点研发计划项目(20192BBF60058)和江西省水利科技计划项目(201821ZDKT20)资助


Effect of Reduced Nitrogen Fertilization on Nitrogen Runoff Loss and Apparent Balance on Red-soil Dry Slope Peanut Land
Author:
Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41761060 and 42067020), the Provincial Key Research and Development Program of Jiangxi (No.20192BBF60058) and the Science Foundation of Jiangxi Provincial Water Conservancy Department (No. 201821ZDKT20)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [24]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对红壤旱坡地土壤侵蚀严重和渗漏淋溶强烈并存的现状,为探讨减量施氮对作物产量、氮素径流和渗漏损失特征及氮素表观平衡的影响,选择赣北红壤旱坡花生地开展田间随机区组试验,设置5个处理:100%施氮量(N100%,纯施氮180 kg·hm–2)、减1/6施氮量(N1/6)、减1/3施氮量(N1/3)、减1/2施氮量(N1/2)和不施氮(N0),每个处理重复3次。结果表明:(1)与N100%处理相比,N1/6和N1/2处理的花生产量和植株吸氮量略低,但差异不显著(P > 0.05);与N100%处理相比,N1/6和N1/2处理在主茎长、株高、冠幅、饱果数和原始分枝数等农艺性状上无显著性差异(P > 0.05)。(2)与N100%处理相比,N1/6、N1/3、N1/2、N0处理显著(P < 0.05)降低了地表径流TN平均浓度,降幅分别为14.36%、26.35%、14.01%、21.34%;与N100%处理相比,N1/3、N1/2和N0处理降低了渗漏TN平均浓度,而N1/6处理提高了渗漏TN平均浓度。(3)有34.95~93.98 kg·hm–2氮素流出该花生种植体系,其中径流流失和渗漏淋失的氮量占38.31%~70.50%,高于气体等其他表观损失的氮量(29.50%~60.63%)。这表明径流流失和渗漏淋失是红壤旱坡花生地氮素损失的重要途径。在新开垦土地上不施氮处理降低了土壤无机氮量而减氮施肥处理增加了土壤无机氮量,增加幅度达18.66%~31.44%,减氮施肥可以提高土壤肥力。综合生产目标、环境影响及土壤肥力来看,红壤旱坡花生地推荐施氮水平为90 kg·hm–2

    Abstract:

    Objective Severe soil erosion and water leakage on dry slopes of red soils are a common phenomenon that results in significant nitrogen loss. These occurrences cause nitrogen imbalance and subsequent yield losses. This study aimed to explore the effects of different levels of reduced nitrogen fertilization on crop yield and nitrogen loss characteristics.Method Randomized field trials comprising of five nitrogen treatments in three replicates were set up in peanut fields located in the dry slopes of northern Jiangxi characterized by red soils. The five treatments were 100% nitrogen application rate (N100%, pure nitrogen application of 180 kg·hm–2), 1/6(N1/6), 1/3(N1/3), 1/2(N1/2), and zero (N0) nitrogen application rates.Result The peanut yield and plant nitrogen uptake of N1/2 and N1/6 treatments were insignificantly lower than those of the N100% treatment (P > 0.05). Besides, N1/6 and N1/2 treatments had no significant differences in agronomic characteristics such as the main stem length, plant height, crown width, number of full fruits, and the number of original branches (P > 0.05). N1/6, N1/3, N1/2, and N0 treatments significantly reduced the average total nitrogen (TN) concentration in the surface runoff by 14.36%, 26.35%, 14.01%, and 21.34%, respectively, compared to the N100% treatment (P < 0.05). Also, N1/3, N1/2, and N0 treatments reduced the average TN concentration in the leakage compared to the N100% treatment. However, the average increase in TN leakage concentration in the N1/6 treatment was not significantly different from that of the N100% treatment (P > 0.05). The nitrogen output from the peanut planting system ranged between 34.95 and 93.98 kg·hm–2. Nitrogen losses from runoff and leakage ranged between 38.31% and 70.50%, while other apparent nitrogen losses such as gaseous losses ranged between 29.50% and 60.63%.Conclusion This finding affirmed the significance of nitrogen loss through runoff and leakage. Non-nitrogen treatment on newly reclaimed land reduced the soil inorganic nitrogen while reduced-nitrogen fertilization increased the soil inorganic nitrogen by up to 18.66%-31.44%. Thus, reduced nitrogen fertilization could maintain a constant soil fertility level. Based on the comprehensive production goals, environmental impacts, and soil fertility, 90 kg·hm–2 is the recommended nitrogen application rate for peanuts planted in dry slope land with red soils.

    参考文献
    [1] Huang G Q, Zhao Q G. Initial exploration of red soil ecology[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(18):5173-5181.黄国勤,赵其国.红壤生态学[J].生态学报, 2014, 34(18):5173-5181.
    [2] Wu Q H, Wang Y, Zhao Y N, et al. Effects of NPK ratio on yield, nutrient absorption and economic benefit of high-yielding summer peanut in a fluvo-aquic soil[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2019(2):98-104.武庆慧,汪洋,赵亚南,等.氮磷钾配比对潮土区高产夏播花生产量、养分吸收和经济效益的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料, 2019(2):98-104.
    [3] Zhu B, Zhou M H, Kuang F H, et al. Measurement and simulation of nitrogen leaching loss in hillslope cropland of purple soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2013, 21(1):102-109.朱波,周明华,况福虹,等.紫色土坡耕地氮素淋失通量的实测与模拟[J].中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(1):102-109.
    [4] Li H C, Zhao N, Sha N, et al. Effects of reduced fertilization on yield and fertilizer use efficiency of maize under drip irrigation[J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2017, 45(6):39-43.李焕春,赵娜,莎娜,等.滴灌条件下减量施肥对玉米产量及肥料利用率的影响[J].北方农业学报, 2017, 45(6):39-43.
    [5] Zhao Y N, Su M M, Lü Y, et al. Wheat yield, nutrient use efficiencies and soil nutrient balance under reduced fertilizer rate[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2017, 23(4):864-873.赵亚南,宿敏敏,吕阳,等.减量施肥下小麦产量、肥料利用率和土壤养分平衡[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(4):864-873.
    [6] Yuan G, Zhang G C, Ding H, et al. Effect of reducing nitrogen fertilizer application on agronomic traits and yield of peanut in dry land[J]. Journal of Peanut Science, 2019, 48(3):30-35.袁光,张冠初,丁红,等.减施氮肥对旱地花生农艺性状及产量的影响[J].花生学报, 2019, 48(3):30-35.
    [7] Zhao X F, Fang Z G. Research progress on the relationship between nitrogen fixationand nitrogen application in soybean and peanut[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2005, 11(3):48-49.赵秀芬,房增国.大豆、花生固氮与施氮关系的研究进展[J].安徽农学通报, 2005, 11(3):48-49.
    [8] Wan S B, Feng H S, Zuo X Q, et al. Nitrogen use efficiency of peanuts with different nitrogen supply levels[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2000, 32(1):31-33.万书波,封海胜,左学青,等.不同供氮水平花生的氮素利用效率[J].山东农业科学, 2000, 32(1):31-33.
    [9] Lin X B, Zhou L J, Huang S S, et al. Changes of agronomic traits, yield and soil nutrient of red soil in Southern China under different nitrogen application rates[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(6):1076-1083.林小兵,周利军,黄尚书,等.不同施氮量下南方红壤花生农艺性状、产量及土壤养分的变化[J].热带作物学报, 2020, 41(6):1076-1083.
    [10] Si X Z, Zhang X, Mao J W, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate on peanut yield and quality and nitrogen utilization efficiency[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(29):91-96.司贤宗,张翔,毛家伟,等.施氮量对花生产质量及氮肥利用率的影响[J].中国农学通报, 2016, 32(29):91-96.
    [11] Sun H, Li S X, Wang Y F, et al. Effects of nitrogen application on source of nitrogen accumulation and yields of different peanut cultivars[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2010, 16(1):153-157.孙虎,李尚霞,王月福,等.施氮量对不同花生品种积累氮素来源和产量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(1):153-157.
    [12] Ju X T, Zhang C. The principles and indicators of rational N fertilization[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2021, 58(1):1-13.巨晓棠,张翀.论合理施氮的原则和指标[J].土壤学报, 2021, 58(1):1-13.
    [13] Liang H R, Li J T, Li Y L, et al. Deep leakage characteristics and water balance of irrigated farmland in ulan buh desert[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(4):187-194.梁海荣,李佳陶,李艳丽,等.乌兰布和沙漠灌溉农田深层渗漏特征与水量平衡[J].中国沙漠, 2019, 39(4):187-194.
    [14] Guo Z, Liu H J, Zhang Y F, et al. Effects of different fertilization modes on nitrogen loss by surface runoff and the apparent nitrogen balance in the vegetable fields of Taihu Lake region, China[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 32(4):37-42, 50.郭智,刘红江,张岳芳,等.不同施肥模式对菜地氮素径流损失与表观平衡的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2018, 32(4):37-42, 50.
    [15] Zhang H X, Zhou H P, Yang Z X, et al. Effect of long-term fertilization to distribution and accumulation of NO3--N in dryland soil[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 42(5):465-469.张慧霞,周怀平,杨振兴,等.长期施肥对旱地土壤剖面硝态氮分布和累积的影响[J].山西农业科学, 2014, 42(5):465-469.
    [16] Liu X J, Ju X T, Pan J R. et al. Nitrogen balance and nitrogen loss pathways in winter wheat-summer maize rotation[C]. Symposium on Nitrogen Cycle and Agriculture and Environment. 2001:10.刘学军,巨晓棠,潘家荣,等.冬小麦—夏玉米轮作中的氮素平衡与损失途径[C].氮素循环与农业和环境学术讨论会论文集. 2001:10.
    [17] Liang J Z. Characteristics of soil and water erosion on the slopes with different vegetation patterns in red soil region of Southern China[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 22(4):95-99.梁娟珠.南方红壤区不同植被措施坡面的水土流失特征[J].水土保持研究, 2015, 22(4):95-99.
    [18] Raun W R, Johnson G V. Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1999, 91(3):357-363.
    [19] Ju X T, Christie P. Calculation of theoretical nitrogen rate for simple nitrogen recommendations in intensive cropping systems:A case study on the North China Plain[J]. Field Crops Research, 2011, 124(3):450-458.
    [20] Zhang G L, Zhao R, Liu Y T, et al. Effect of different amount of nitrogen on the yield and the quality of high quality rice and its nitrogen utilization efficiency[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2019, 45(3):231-236.张桂莲,赵瑞,刘逸童,等.施氮量对优质稻产量和稻米品质及氮素利用效率的影响[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 45(3):231-236.
    [21] Song H X, Wang P, Shen S L. et al. Study on the relations between commensally nitrogen fixation and the total nitrogen content of leaves in soybean[J]. Jilin Agricultural Sciences, 2000, 25(6):9-11.宋海星,王萍,申斯乐,等.大豆共生固氮与叶片全氮含量之间关系的研究[J].吉林农业科学, 2000, 25(6):9-11.
    [22] Luo Z P, Xie F. Mechanism of nitrate regulating symbiotic nitrogen fixation between legumes and Rhizobium[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2019, 35(10):34-39.罗振鹏,谢芳.硝酸盐调控豆科植物与根瘤菌共生固氮的机制研究[J].生物技术通报, 2019, 35(10):34-39.
    [23] Liu H J, Kang Y H. Effects of droplets kinetic energy on soil infiltration rate and surface runoff under sprinkler irrigation[J]. Irrigation and Drainage, 2002, 21(2):71-74, 79.刘海军,康跃虎.喷灌动能对土壤入渗和地表径流影响的研究进展[J].灌溉排水, 2002, 21(2):71-74, 79.
    [24] He Y Q, Wang X X, Hu F, et al. Dynamic of soil nutrient and water loss in artificial forest in low hilly red soil region[J]. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 2002, 16(4):91-93, 97.何园球,王兴祥,胡锋,等.红壤丘岗区人工林土壤水分、养分流失动态研究[J].水土保持学报, 2002, 16(4):91-93, 97.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

郑文琦,谭文峰,刘昭,王凌云,郑海金.氮肥减施对红壤旱坡花生地氮素径流和渗漏损失及表观平衡的影响[J].土壤学报,2022,59(6):1540-1550. DOI:10.11766/trxb202104070019 ZHENG Wenqi, TAN Wenfeng, LIU Zhao, WANG Lingyun, ZHENG Haijin. Effect of Reduced Nitrogen Fertilization on Nitrogen Runoff Loss and Apparent Balance on Red-soil Dry Slope Peanut Land[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2022,59(6):1540-1550.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:447
  • 下载次数: 1561
  • HTML阅读次数: 1235
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-07
  • 最后修改日期:2021-10-19
  • 录用日期:2021-12-22
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-01-07
文章二维码