Comparison between ion activity method and suspension Wien effect method in determining binding energy between soils and monovalent cations
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Samples of montmorillonite and clay fractions (<2 μm) of black soil, yellow-brown soil, red soil, and latosol were used in the test to determine mean free binding energies (ΔGbi) between monovalent cations Na+, and K+ and various clay particles with the ion activity method and the suspension Wien effect method. Results show that the values ofΔGbi determined of Na+ to black soil, yellow-brown soil and montmorillonite with the two different methods were quite similar, and the relative errors ofΔGbi determined with the ion activity method in relation to those determined with the Wien effect method varied in the range from 24% to 10%; the values ofΔGbi determined of K+ to black soil, and yellow-brown soil with the two different methods were almost the same, with relative errors lingering below 2%. But the relative errors ofΔGbi determination of red soil were about 11.5%. The results also indicated that the sodium glass electrode is applicable to this experiment only when the difference in pH between the standard solution and the suspension to be tested is less than 0.5; and the liquid-membrane potassium electrode can be used to determine K+ activity in the soil suspensions in this experiment, but can not in the suspensions of montmorillonite. However, it is still impossible to directly apply the Wien effect method to determination of binding energy of monovalent cations to the variable-charge soils, positive in charge, such as latosol.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

Zhou Jun, Li Chengbao. Comparison between ion activity method and suspension Wien effect method in determining binding energy between soils and monovalent cations[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2010,47(6):1151-1158.

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:February 10,2009
  • Revised:June 02,2009
  • Adopted:April 30,2009
  • Online: August 31,2010
  • Published: