Soil Methane Production and Oxidation Potential and Its Response to Temperature under Rice-aquaculture Co-culture Systems
CSTR:
Author:
Clc Number:

S154.2

Fund Project:

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42077080) and the Agriculture Science and Technology Innovation Fund of Jiangsu Province, China (Nos. JASTIF, CX [21] 3007)

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [37]
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    【Objective】 Paddy fields are important anthropogenic sources of atmospheric methane. This study is to investigate the methane production and oxidation potentials and their responses to temperature under different rice-based land use types. 【Method】 Soil samples from four typical land use types in Jurong City, Jiangsu Province, including conventional rice area(CR), rice-crayfish rice area(R-CR), rice-crayfish crayfish area(R-CC) and conventional crayfish area(CC) were collected. Laboratory culture experiments were conducted at 5℃, 15℃, 25℃ and 35℃ for 30 days. 【Result】 The results showed that land use transformation had significant effects on methane production potential and methane oxidation potential. The methane production potential was 1.14 μg·g-1·d-1 in the R-CC area, 0.33 μg·g-1·d-1 in the CC area, 0.25 μg·g-1·d-1 in the R-CR area and 0.17 μg·g-1·d-1 in CR area. Also, the values of methane oxidation potential were 1.38 μg·g-1·d-1 in the CR area, 1.01 μg·g-1·d-1 in the CC area, 1.00 μg·g-1·d-1 in the R-CR area and 0.71 μg·g-1·d-1 R-CC area. The methane production potential increased exponentially with the increase in temperature. The average values of methane production potential at 5℃, 15℃, 25℃ and 35℃ were 0.13, 0.26, 0.55 and 0.95 μg·g-1·d-1, respectively. However, the methane oxidation potential was sensitive only at low temperatures. Specifically, the methane oxidation potential at 15℃, 25℃ and 35℃ were significantly different from the methane oxidation potential at 5℃, while there was no significant difference between the three culture temperatures. The average values of methane oxidation potential at 5℃, 15℃, 25℃ and 35℃ are 0.71, 1.14, 1.14 and 1.11 μg·g-1·d-1, respectively.【Conclusion】 Due to differences in water management, feed and nitrogen fertilizer input, substrate and environmental factors led to differences in the activities of methanogenic bacteria and methane-oxidizing bacteria. Therefore, soils with different land use types presented different characteristics of methane production and oxidation potentials. Generally, the methane production potential was more sensitive to temperature than the methane oxidation potential. The soil methane production potential and oxidation potential were significantly affected by temperature or land use type(P < 0.01), but the interaction between the two factors only had a significant impact on soil methane production potential but not on methane oxidation potential.

    Reference
    [1] Swart N C, Gille S T, Fyfe J C, et al. Recent Southern Ocean warming and freshening driven by greenhouse gas emissions and ozone depletion[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2018, 11(11):836-841.
    [2] IPCC. Climate change 2021:The physical science basis[R]. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2391.
    [3] He J, Naik V, Horowitz L W, et al. Investigation of the global methane budget over 1980-2017 using GFDL-AM4.1[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2020, 20(2):805-827.
    [4] Saunois M, Bousquet P, Poulter B, et al. The global methane budget 2000-2012[J]. Earth System Science Data Discussions, 2016, 8(2):697-751.
    [5] Tian H Q, Lu C Q, Ciais P, et al. The terrestrial biosphere as a net source of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere[J]. Nature, 2016, 531(7593):225-228.
    [6] FAO. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2020[R]. Sustainablity in action. Rome, 2020.
    [7] Bashir M A, Liu J, Geng Y C, et al. Co-culture of rice and aquatic animals:An integrated system to achieve production and environmental sustainability[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 249:119310.
    [8] Yuan J J, Xiang J, Liu D Y, et al. Rapid growth in greenhouse gas emissions from the adoption of industrial-scale aquaculture[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2019, 9:318-322.
    [9] Liu S W, Hu Z Q, Wu S, et al. Methane and nitrous oxide emissions reduced following conversion of rice paddies to inland crab-fish aquaculture in southeast China[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(2):633-642.
    [10] van Hulzen J, Segers R, van Bodegom P, et al. Temperature effects on soil methane production:An explanation for observed variability[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1999, 31(14):1919-1929.
    [11] Zhang H, Tuittila E S, Korrensalo A, et al. Methane production and oxidation potentials along a Fen-bog gradient from southern boreal to subarctic peatlands in Finland[J]. Global Change Biology, 2021, 27(18):4449-4464.
    [12] Bhattarai S, Cassarini C, Lens P N L. Physiology and distribution of archaeal methanotrophs that couple anaerobic oxidation of methane with sulfate reduction[J]. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 2019, 83(3):e00074-e00018.
    [13] Fan L C, Dippold M A, Thiel V, et al. Temperature sensitivity of anaerobic methane oxidation versus methanogenesis in paddy soil:Implications for the CH4 balance under global warming[J]. Global Change Biology, 2022, 28(2):654-664.
    [14] Liu P F, Klose M, Conrad R. Temperature effects on structure and function of the methanogenic microbial communities in two paddy soils and one desert soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 124:236-244.
    [15] Liu T Q, Li C F, Tan W F, et al. Rice-crayfish co-culture reduces ammonia volatilization and increases rice nitrogen uptake in central China[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2022, 330:107869.
    [16] Bao S D. Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing:China Agriculture Press, 2000. [鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2000.]
    [17] Singh A, Singh R S, Upadhyay S N, et al. Community structure of methanogenic archaea and methane production associated with compost-treated tropical rice-field soil[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2012, 82(1):118-134.
    [18] Kim G W, Ho A, Kim P J, et al. Stimulation of methane oxidation potential and effects on vegetation growth by bottom ash addition in a landfill final evapotranspiration cover[J]. Waste Management, 2016, 55:306-312.
    [19] Xu H, Cai Z C, Yagi K. Methane production potentials of rice paddy soils and its affecting factors[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2008, 45(1):98-104. [徐华, 蔡祖聪, 八木一行. 水稻土CH4产生潜力及其影响因素[J]. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(1):98-104.]
    [20] Wang Q S. Regulation and mechanism of greenhouse gas emissions of circular agriculture ecosystem of planting and breeding in paddy[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2018, 26(5):633-642. [王强盛. 稻田种养结合循环农业温室气体排放的调控与机制[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(5):633-642.]
    [21] Tang Q, Xue X F, Wang H, et al. New knowledge of methanogens and methanotrophs in lake ecosystems[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2018, 30(3):597-610. [唐千, 薛校风, 王惠, 等. 湖泊生态系统产甲烷与甲烷氧化微生物研究进展[J]. 湖泊科学, 2018, 30(3):597-610.]
    [22] Yuan Y, Bingner R L, Theurer F D, et al. Water quality simulation of rice/crawfish field ponds within annualized AGNPS[J]. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2007, 23(5):585-595
    [23] Fang X T, Zhao J T, Wu S, et al. A two-year measurement of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from freshwater aquaculture ponds:Affected by aquaculture species, stocking and water management[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 813:151863.
    [24] Liu D Y, Ding W X, Yuan J J, et al. Substrate and/or substrate-driven changes in the abundance of methanogenic archaea cause seasonal variation of methane production potential in species-specific freshwater wetlands[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2014, 98(10):4711-4721.
    [25] Zeleke J, Sheng Q, Wang J G, et al. Effects of Spartina alterniflora invasion on the communities of methanogens and sulfate-reducing bacteria in estuarine marsh sediments[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2013, 4:243.
    [26] Wang W Q, Zeng C S, Tong C. Methane production and oxidation capacities of soil from the reed marsh of the Minjiang River Estuary[J]. Wetland Science, 2008, 6(1):60-68. [王维奇, 曾从盛, 仝川. 闽江口芦苇湿地土壤甲烷产生与氧化能力研究[J]. 湿地科学, 2008, 6(1):60-68.]
    [27] Wassmann R, Neue H, Bueno C, et al. Methane production capacities of different rice soils derived from inherent and exogenous substrates[J]. Plant and Soil, 1998, 203(2):227-237.
    [28] Yang P, He Q H, Tong C. Responses of methane production to temperature in tidal marshes soil of the Min River Estuary[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2015, 35(9):2957-2963. [杨平, 何清华, 仝川. 闽江口潮汐沼泽湿地土壤甲烷产生对温度变化的响应[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015, 35(9):2957-2963.]
    [29] Conrad R. The global methane cycle:Recent advances in understanding the microbial processes involved[J]. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 2009, 1(5):285-292.
    [30] Jiang N, Chen Z J, Cao Y, et al. Methanogenic archaea and their mediated methanogenic pathways in cold wetland[J]. Microbiology China, 2013, 40(1):137-145. [蒋娜, 陈紫娟, 曹轶, 等. 低温湿地甲烷古菌及其介导的甲烷产生途径[J]. 微生物学通报, 2013, 40(1):137-145.]
    [31] Høj L, Olsen R A, Torsvik V L. Effects of temperature on the diversity and community structure of known methanogenic groups and other archaea in high Arctic peat[J]. The ISME Journal, 2008, 2(1):37-48.
    [32] Zhang J C, Xu Y Q, Lu Y H. Microbial mechanisms of methane production and oxidation in terrestrial ecosystems[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(20):6592-6603. [张坚超, 徐镱钦, 陆雅海. 陆地生态系统甲烷产生和氧化过程的微生物机理[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(20):6592-6603.]
    [33] Grosskopf R, Janssen P H, Liesack W. Diversity and structure of the methanogenic community in anoxic rice paddy soil microcosms as examined by cultivation and direct 16S rRNA gene sequence retrieval[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1998, 64(3):960-969.
    [34] Rui J P, Qiu Q F, Lu Y H. Syntrophic acetate oxidation under thermophilic methanogenic condition in Chinese paddy field soil[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2011, 77(2):264-273.
    [35] Knoblauch C, Zimmermann U, Blumenberg M, et al. Methane turnover and temperature response of methane-oxidizing bacteria in permafrost-affected soils of northeast Siberia[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008, 40(12):3004-3013.
    [36] Ding W X, Cai Z C. Effect of temperature on methane production and oxidation in soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003, 14(4):604-608. [丁维新, 蔡祖聪. 温度对甲烷产生和氧化的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14(4):604-608.]
    [37] Xu X, Chen C, Xiong Z Q. Effects of biochar and nitrogen fertilizer amendment on abundance and potential activity of methanotrophs and methanogens in paddy field[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2016, 53(6):1517-1527. [许欣, 陈晨, 熊正琴. 生物炭与氮肥对稻田甲烷产生与氧化菌数量和潜在活性的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2016, 53(6):1517-1527.]
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

ZHAO Jianting, FANG Xiantao, ZOU Jianwen, LIU Shuwei. Soil Methane Production and Oxidation Potential and Its Response to Temperature under Rice-aquaculture Co-culture Systems[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2024,61(2):539-548.

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:July 07,2022
  • Revised:March 15,2023
  • Adopted:May 24,2023
  • Online: May 26,2023
  • Published: March 15,2024
Article QR Code