Microplastic Pollution Characteristics and Ecological Risk Assessment in Soils of a Historical Non-Sanitary Landfill and Adjacent Farmland
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

1.State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Risk Assessment and Control for Chemical Processes,School of Resources and Environmental Engineering,East China University of Science and Technology;2.Shanghai Environment Sanitation Engineering Design Institute

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(No.2023YFC3711600)

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    【Objective】Historically non-sanitary landfills continuously release microplastics(MPs) into adjacent soils due to the absence of impermeable lining systems, thereby exacerbating ecological risks at the site and in surrounding environments. This study aims to investigate the distribution characteristics and ecological risks of MPs in a historically non-sanitary landfill and adjacent farmland soils in Jiashan County, Zhejiang Province, East China. The research aims to identify key pollution sources and evaluate the efficacy of multi-method risk assessment frameworks for informing targeted pollution control strategies.【Method】For landfill sites and surrounding farmland topsoil, the distribution characteristics and ecological risks of microplastic pollution were revealed through the combined application of micro-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (µ-FTIR), the Pollution Load Index (PLI), Risk Characterization Ratio (RCR), the Multi-characteristics Potential Ecological Risk Index (MPERI), and Monte Carlo simulation.【Result】(1) Landfill soils exhibited significantly higher MPs abundance (7,425.5–21,306.5 items/kg) than farmland soils (199.5–2,868.5 items/kg). Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polyethylene (PE) were the main MP types in both sites (>70% of total MPs). Small-sized MPs (<1 mm) accounted for 70.9% in landfill soil and 66.3% in farmland soil, while transparent MPs comprised 71.8% and 53.1% in landfill and farmland soil, respectively. The landfill was identified as a potential source of farmland MPs. (2) Multi-model risk assessment revealed that PLI classified the landfill as medium-to-high risk and farmland as low-to-medium risk, whereas RCR and MPERI indicated low-to-medium risk for both. Risk escalated significantly at sites containing acrylonitrile resin (PAN). (3) Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that farmland had a higher probability of low PLI risk than the landfill. Nevertheless, both RCR and MPERI might underestimate ecological risks in the landfill. Sensitivity analysis identified MPs polymer type as the paramount parameter influencing risk outcomes.【Conclusion】The landfill acts as a critical source of MPs contamination in adjacent agricultural soils. Discrepancies in risk outcomes across models highlight the necessity of integrating multi-method assessments with probabilistic approaches (e.g., Monte Carlo) to quantify uncertainties. Polymer type is a decisive factor in ecological risk, necessitating prioritized controls for PAN-containing MPs. This empirical-modeling framework provides a scientific basis for hierarchical management of MPs pollution in non-sanitary landfills and surrounding environments, promoting the application of probabilistic risk models in contaminated sites.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation
Related Videos

Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:July 04,2025
  • Revised:August 27,2025
  • Adopted:September 03,2025
  • Online: September 04,2025
  • Published:
Article QR Code