SIGNIFICANCE OF SOIL ORGANIC MATTER, TOTAL N AND MINERALI ZABLE NITROGEN IN REFLECTING SOIL N SUPPLYING CAPACITY
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Twenty five surface soil samples taken from different sites and 36 soil samples from 6 soils, each consisting of 6 layers, were used to study the relations of the mineralizable N to the organic matter and total N. The mineralizable N was estimated by an aerobic incubation. The results showed that the mineralized N was very well correlated with the organic matter and total N for all the soils. However, the ratios of mineralized N to the organic matter or to the total N were remarkably different, and the mineralized N was more correlated with the ratios. These results strongly demonstrated that the amounts of the mineralized N were dependant on both the contents and the potentially mineralizable proport ions of the total N and organic matter, and that the contents of the total N or organic matter were unable to provide the information on the proportion made available to plants. Field experiments were conducted using 15 soils containing low accumulated nitrate N in soil profile, and the results revealed that the mineralizable N had good correlation with either wheat yield or N uptake. However, the organic matter or total N was not so as the mineralizable N, though the total N had a high correlation coefficient with wheat yield in case without P addition. The result further confirmed that determination of mineralizable N had its significance, and could not be replaced by determination of organic matter or total N.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

Li Ju-mei, Wang Zhao-hui, Li Sheng-xiu. SIGNIFICANCE OF SOIL ORGANIC MATTER, TOTAL N AND MINERALI ZABLE NITROGEN IN REFLECTING SOIL N SUPPLYING CAPACITY[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2003,40(2):232-238.

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:May 21,2001
  • Revised:July 29,2002
  • Adopted:
  • Online: February 25,2013
  • Published: