Accumulation of amino sugar carbon affected by tillage in black soil in Northeast China
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Soil tillage practices have been shown to have significant influence on microbial activity and community structure through changing soil chemical and physical properties, and as a further consequence on sequestration of soil organic carbon (C). Analysis of soil amino sugar C helps us further understand the underlying microbial processes mediating soil organic carbon stabilization and turnover in soils under different tillage practices. Effects of no-tillage (NT) vs. conventional tillage (CT) over 7 years on the accumulation of amino sugar C in the plow layer (0~20 cm) in black soil of a 7–year-long experiment in Northeast China were analyzed. It was found that NT significantly increased the content of total amino sugar C in the whole plow layer ( p <0.05), especially in the top soil (0~5 cm) by 94.7% as compared with CT. The finding indicates that NT favors sequestration of microbial derived organic C in the black soils under study. The amounts of amino sugar C’s of different sources all increased in NT over CT in a varying degree. At all the three soil depths, the ratios of glucosamine to muramic acid were significantly higher in NT soils (6.9~7.3) than in their respective CT soils (4.7~5.4) mainly because of more pronounced enrichment of gulcosamine. The enrichment of fungal-derived glucosamine suggests that fungi have gradually grown into dominance in the NT agroecosystems, thus leading to higher soil organic C storage in the soils.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

DingXueli, Zhang Xudong, Yang Xueming, Zhang Xiaoping. Accumulation of amino sugar carbon affected by tillage in black soil in Northeast China[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2012,49(3):535-543.

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:December 21,2010
  • Revised:April 24,2011
  • Adopted:July 01,2011
  • Online: February 27,2012
  • Published: