棉隆熏蒸和强还原处理对农田土壤抗生素抗性基因的影响研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.南京师范大学地理科学学院;2.江苏省农业农村污染防治技术与装备工程研究中心

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(42090065, 42077031)、江苏省农业农村污染防治技术与装备工程研究中心开放资金(GCZXZD2301)和江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(KYCX23_1720,KYCX22_1568)


Effects of Dazomet Fumigation and Reductive Soil Disinfestation on Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Farmland Soil
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Geography,Nanjing Normal University;2.Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Agricultural and Rural Pollution Prevention Technology and Equipment,Nantong

Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China Program (42090065,42077031), Opening Project of Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Agricultural and Rural Pollution Prevention Technology and Equipment (GCZXZD2301), and Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX23_1720, KYCX22_1568)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    化学熏蒸和强还原处理(Reductive soil disinfestation, RSD)是农业生产上广泛应用的土壤灭菌措施,但它们是否同样能够消减土壤中富集的抗生素抗性基因(Antibiotics resistance genes, ARGs),目前还不得而知。本研究以长期鸡粪施用导致ARGs富集的农田土壤为研究对象,分别设置0.02%的棉隆熏蒸(DZ)和以1%的乙醇(ET,总有机碳:521.7 g·kg-1)、苜蓿粉(AL,总有机碳:454.9 g·kg-1,碳氮比:21.2)、糖蜜(MO,总有机碳:270.1 g·kg-1,碳氮比:12.6)以及苜蓿粉和糖蜜复合物(AM,m/m=1:1)为有机物料的RSD处理,同时设置最大持水量(FCK)和不处理对照(CK),利用荧光定量PCR技术研究土壤中主要ARGs和可移动遗传元件(Mobile genetic elements, MGEs)在绝对丰度和相对丰度上的变化,并通过消减率来评估不同处理对土壤ARGs和MGEs的消减效果。研究发现,RSD处理能够消减aadA21、msrE、tetG、tetM、ErmF等基因的相对丰度,其中AL、MO和AM处理对aadA21基因相对丰度的消减率达到50.5%~58.3%,而ET处理对msrE、tetG和tetM基因相对丰度的消减效果显著,其消减率分别高达80.9%、78.3%和66.9%。同时,RSD处理能够显著降低土壤中MGEs(IS6100和IS26)的相对丰度,消减率分别为67.7%~74.3%和38.1%~42.6%。此外,DZ处理对土壤中ARGs和MGEs的相对丰度具有一定的增加作用,其中ARGs和IS26的相对丰度分别提高了21.9%和42.6%。综上,RSD处理能够通过降低ARGs和MGEs的相对丰度,限制ARGs的水平转移能力,实现对土壤ARGs的消减,且其消减效果与所使用的有机物料类型有关。此外,相较于棉隆熏蒸,RSD处理对ARGs和MGEs的消减效果更好,具备快速修复ARGs污染土壤的潜力。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The prevalence and dissemination of antibiotics resistance genes (ARGs) in farmland soils have become a major threat to food security and human health. However, there is still no effective method to remediate ARGs-contaminated farmland soil. Chemical fumigation and reductive soil disinfestation (RSD) are widely used to kill soil-borne pathogens in agricultural production, but it is still unknown whether they are capable of reducing the abundance of ARGs in ARGs-enriched soil. [Method] In this study, an ARGs-enriched farmland soil due to long-term application of chicken manure was selected, and soil incubation experiment with seven treatments: CK (control without soil treatment), FCK (maximum water holding capacity treatment), DZ (chemical fumigation with 0.02% dazomet), and RSD with 1% ethanol (ET, TOC: 521.7 g·kg-1), alfalfa (AL, TOC: 454.9 g·kg-1, C/N: 21.2), molasses (MO, TOC: 270.1 g·kg-1, C/N: 12.6) and the mixture of alfalfa and molasses (AM, m/m=1:1), were conducted to investigate the shifts in absolute abundance and relative abundance of ARGs and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) via real-time PCR. The effects of different treatments on soil ARGs and MGEs were evaluated by reduction rate. [Result] Results showed that RSD treatment could decrease the relative abundance of aadA21, msrE, tetG, tetM, and ErmF genes, with the reduction of the aadA21 gene in relative abundance being 50.5%~58.3% in AL-, MO-, and AM-treated soils, while the relative abundances of msrE, tetG and tetM genes were significantly lowered by ET treatment, with the reduction rate being as high as 80.9%, 78.3%, and 66.9%, respectively. Meanwhile, RSD treatment could significantly decrease the relative abundance of MGEs (IS6100 and IS26 gene), with the reduction rate being 67.7%~74.3% and 38.1%~42.6%, respectively. In addition, the relative abundances of ARGs and MGEs were slightly increased in DZ treatment, with the increasing rate of ARGs and IS26 gene being 21.9% and 42.6%, respectively. [Conclusion] Collectively, RSD treatment can decrease soil ARGs contamination by reducing the relative abundance of ARGs and MGEs, limiting the horizontal transfer ability of ARGs, and the reduction effect is related to the type of organic materials used. Moreover, RSD treatment is more effective in reducing the relative abundance of ARGs and MGEs than dazomet fumigation and has the potential for rapid remediation of ARGs-contaminated soil.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

于文豪,李舒,林于蓝,张晶清,徐晨伟,刘亮亮,张金波,蔡祖聪,赵军.棉隆熏蒸和强还原处理对农田土壤抗生素抗性基因的影响研究[J].土壤学报,,[待发表]
YU Wenhao, LI Shu, LIN Yulan, ZHANG Jingqing, XU Chenwei, LIU Liangliang, ZHANG Jinbo, CAI Zucong, ZHAO Jun. Effects of Dazomet Fumigation and Reductive Soil Disinfestation on Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Farmland Soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,,[In Press]

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-10
  • 最后修改日期:2024-01-19
  • 录用日期:2024-03-25
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: